Jump to content

.doctor: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Marie Cabural (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
# [[Radix]] (DotMedico TLD Inc.), .doctor is one of 31 applications submitted by the company, which has chosen [[ARI Registry Services]] as its backend technical provider.<ref>[http://www.radixregistry.com/tlds/social-healthcare.php Social Healthcare, RadixRegistry.com]</ref>
# [[Radix]] (DotMedico TLD Inc.), .doctor is one of 31 applications submitted by the company, which has chosen [[ARI Registry Services]] as its backend technical provider.<ref>[http://www.radixregistry.com/tlds/social-healthcare.php Social Healthcare, RadixRegistry.com]</ref>
# [[Donuts]] (Brice Trail, LLC)- This is one of the companies created by Donuts, which applied for 307 new gTLDs under different company names. The company invested $56 million in application fees alone. [[Daniel Schindler]], co-founder and EVP for Marketing and Sales, is the primary contact person in the application. <ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/donuts-inc-eye-popping-list-of-307-new-top-level-domains/11730 Donuts Inc eye popping list of 307 new top-level domains]</ref>
# [[Donuts]] (Brice Trail, LLC)- This is one of the companies created by Donuts, which applied for 307 new gTLDs under different company names. The company invested $56 million in application fees alone. [[Daniel Schindler]], co-founder and EVP for Marketing and Sales, is the primary contact person in the application. <ref>[http://www.domainnamenews.com/new-gtlds/donuts-inc-eye-popping-list-of-307-new-top-level-domains/11730 Donuts Inc eye popping list of 307 new top-level domains]</ref>
# [[The Medical Registry Limited]] -he contact person in the application is Mr. [[Sloan Daniel Gaon]].
# [[The Medical Registry Limited]] -the contact person in the application is Mr. [[Sloan Daniel Gaon]].
 
 
===Donuts===
The application for [[.doctor]] from Donuts was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 24 Nov 2012</ref> The warning notes that the TLD refers to a regulated market though Donuts did not include sufficient mechanisms to prevent consumer harm in its application.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Doctor-AU-52453.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353387521000 Doctor AU, GACweb.ICANN.org]</ref> None of the other two applicants received a GAC Early Warning.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 02:28, 25 November 2012

Status: Proposed
Type: Generic
Category: Health

More information:

.doctor is a proposed new TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. Radix (DotMedico TLD Inc.), .doctor is one of 31 applications submitted by the company, which has chosen ARI Registry Services as its backend technical provider.[1]
  2. Donuts (Brice Trail, LLC)- This is one of the companies created by Donuts, which applied for 307 new gTLDs under different company names. The company invested $56 million in application fees alone. Daniel Schindler, co-founder and EVP for Marketing and Sales, is the primary contact person in the application. [2]
  3. The Medical Registry Limited -the contact person in the application is Mr. Sloan Daniel Gaon.


Donuts[edit | edit source]

The application for .doctor from Donuts was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[3] The warning notes that the TLD refers to a regulated market though Donuts did not include sufficient mechanisms to prevent consumer harm in its application.[4] None of the other two applicants received a GAC Early Warning.

References[edit | edit source]