.shopping: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
# [[Donuts]] (Sea Tigers, LLC) This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/587 here]. | # [[Donuts]] (Sea Tigers, LLC) This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/587 here]. | ||
# [[Uniregistry]], Corp.<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Shopping Status, ICANN.org]</ref> | # [[Uniregistry]], Corp.<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Shopping Status, ICANN.org]</ref> | ||
==String Confusion Objection== | |||
[[.shop]] applicant [[Commercial Connect]] submitted an objection to [[Donuts]]' application for .shopping on the grounds that the two strings are confusingly similar and that Internet users might mistake the strings for one another. An [[ICDR]] panelist, Robert Nau, ruled in favor of [[Commercial Connect]], which may force [[Donuts]' application into a contention set along with all of the applicants for [[.shop]]. However, no objection was filed against [[Uniregistry]] for their application of .shopping.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14738-shopping-ruled-confusingly-similar-to-shop .shopping Ruled Confusingly Similar to .shop, Domain Incite] Retrieved 18 Oct 2013</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 17:59, 18 October 2013
| Status: | Proposed |
| country: | International |
| Type: | Generic |
| Category: | Commerce |
| Priority #: | 1306 - Uniregistry, Corp. 1451 - Donuts (Sea Tigers, LLC) |
More information: 
| |
.shopping is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.
Applicants
- Donuts (Sea Tigers, LLC) This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
- Uniregistry, Corp.[1]
String Confusion Objection
.shop applicant Commercial Connect submitted an objection to Donuts' application for .shopping on the grounds that the two strings are confusingly similar and that Internet users might mistake the strings for one another. An ICDR panelist, Robert Nau, ruled in favor of Commercial Connect, which may force [[Donuts]' application into a contention set along with all of the applicants for .shop. However, no objection was filed against Uniregistry for their application of .shopping.[2]
References
- ↑ Shopping Status, ICANN.org
- ↑ .shopping Ruled Confusingly Similar to .shop, Domain Incite Retrieved 18 Oct 2013