Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- |Charter=https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/filefield_48755/rpm-charter-15mar16-en.pdf ...ace.<ref name="gnsohub">[https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/rpm GNSO's PDP Hub - Review of all RPMs]</ref>.29 KB (4,083 words) - 19:42, 20 May 2022
- ...evenue per 1000 impressions).<ref>[http://www.techterms.com/definition/rpm RPM Definition]</ref>2 KB (321 words) - 04:11, 9 May 2024
- ...e of [[ICANN]] to limit [[PDDRP]]’s scope is a big task for this sort of [[RPM]]. The [[PDDRP]] provides a means to owners of the trademark so that they a ...CANN]] is thinking of expanding the [[DNS]] framework and there are some [[RPM]]s, which are in their testing phase; the time is wrong to modify the [[UDR19 KB (2,848 words) - 21:20, 16 June 2016
- ...DRP''') is a [[Rights Protection Mechanisms|rights protection mechanism]] (RPM) designed to provide trademark holders (whether their marks are registered ...rg/en/issues/council-recommendations-rpm-pdp-phase-1-report-10feb21-en.pdf RPM PDP Phase 1 Report], February 10, 2021 (PDF)</ref> The GNSO recommended tha6 KB (969 words) - 23:08, 3 January 2022
- ...intellectual property;<ref name="wipo">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/rpm/ World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)</ref> additional RPMs buil *'''Perpetual Block''': a perpetual block is an RPM that allows a registered trademark holder to block any attempts to register10 KB (1,373 words) - 19:14, 13 March 2021
- ...en de-prioritized as soon as it is passed by the Council; primary example: RPM Phase 1. Deadlines need to be applied to the [[ICANN Board]] and the [[ICAN ** RPM Phase 1 was a disaster, as the WG spent too much time on chartering; the gr25 KB (3,595 words) - 21:48, 11 April 2024
- ...f the [[PDP Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs]] (PDP-RPM). The review of rights protection mechanisms included a recommendation that ...and builds on the original charter addendum for an IGO work track from PDP-RPM.<ref name="charter">[https://community.icann.org/display/GNSOIWT/2.+Charter10 KB (1,514 words) - 17:26, 18 May 2023
- ...er of the [[Rights Protection Mechanisms]] [[Implementation Review Team]] (RPM IRT). ...Within ICANN, his main areas of interest are related to [[UDRP]] and other RPM policies.2 KB (276 words) - 19:43, 6 March 2024
- ...cific community questions, and 24 proposals. The working group deliberated RPM-related recommendations of the Temporary4 KB (513 words) - 21:45, 11 April 2024
- ...lo is a GNSO Councilor and a member of the Rights Protection Mechanisms ([[RPM]]) working group.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Marie+Pa2 KB (248 words) - 19:40, 10 November 2023
- ...irectory Service (RDS PDP) and Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPM PDP) in all gTLDs.2 KB (262 words) - 19:06, 8 February 2022
- ...on digital security. As part of the ICANN community, she is part of the [[RPM]] review working group. Orembo is also part of the [[ISOC]] Kenya chapter.1 KB (190 words) - 18:35, 1 July 2021
- ...s on digital security. As part of the ICANN community, she is part of the RPM review working group.419 bytes (64 words) - 08:29, 26 May 2016
- ...in the [[DNS]].<ref name="icannrpm">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rpm-drp-2017-10-04-en ICANN.org - Rights Protection Mechanisms and Dispute Reso ...[gTLDs]].<ref>[https://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/rpm-charter-15mar16-en.pdf RPM Working Group Charter], March 15, 2016 (PDF)</ref>18 KB (2,838 words) - 23:26, 19 March 2021
- ...Are you going to use draft-tan-epp-launchphase in order to comply with the RPM requirements of new gTLDs (Y/N)?:16 KB (2,513 words) - 18:13, 6 August 2024
- The second policy will be an RPM that will allow trademark owners to challenge domain names initially reserv3 KB (436 words) - 23:27, 2 June 2014
- CUNA LLC is also proposing an enhanced Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) that will allow trademark owners to challenge domain names initially reser10 KB (1,442 words) - 17:40, 25 January 2021
- ...y|registries]] and [[Registrar|registrars]], for the purpose of supporting RPM procedures, unless otherwise authorized by trademark owners. Intel believed19 KB (2,624 words) - 16:54, 15 March 2021
- ...ovide a fast procedure to deal with clear cases of infringement. It is a [[RPM|required rights protection mechanism]] that must be in place before any new8 KB (1,231 words) - 23:09, 3 January 2022
- ...m Rapid Suspension]] (URS) and [[Trademark Clearinghouse]] provisions as [[RPM|Rights Protection Mechanisms]] (RPMs), or submit a contract renegotiation w16 KB (2,300 words) - 16:10, 19 August 2021