Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
394 bytes removed ,  7 years ago
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
{{TLD||logo  =
 
{{TLD||logo  =
|status = Pre-Delegation Testing (PDT)
+
|status = Pending Approval
 
|manager  =  
 
|manager  =  
 
|country  =  
 
|country  =  
Line 18: Line 18:     
==Applicant==
 
==Applicant==
[[AC Webconnecting Holding B.V.]]- The contact person in the application is [[Mike Rodenbaugh]]. The company filed for a European trademark for .cam on December 12, 2012.<ref>[http://www.trademarkia.com/ctm/cam-893706.htm Legal Force TRADEMARKIA- .cam]</ref>. The contact for Registrars is [[Nicolas Caumette]]
+
[http://www.acwebconnecting.com AC Webconnecting Holding B.V.] - The contact person in the application is [[Mike Rodenbaugh]]. The contact for Registrars is [[Nicolas Caumette]]
 
  −
==String Confusion Objection==
  −
Initially, they were 3 applicants : [[Demand Media]] (United TLD|United TLD Holdco Ltd.), [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Agency Limited) and [[AC Webconnecting Holding B.V.]].[[Verisign]] submitted a separate [[String Confusion Objection]] to the [[ICDR]] against each of the applicants for .cam, on the basis that Internet users would confuse the string with the popular [[.com]] string. In two of the three objections submitted, the panelist assigned to the case ruled in favor of the applicant, meaning the objection was dismissed. However, [[Verisign]] prevailed in the objection against [[Demand Media]]'s application. This created a controversial scenario, one that [[ICANN]] did not appear to have a premeditated solution for. [[Demand Media]] called for [[ICANN]] to review its objections policy in order to resolve the issue.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/14239-string-confusion-in-disarray-as-demands-cam-loses-against-verisigns-com String Confusion in Disarray, Domain Incite] Retrieved 25 Sept 2013</ref>
  −
 
  −
==References==
  −
{{reflist}}
  −
 
      +
== History ==
 +
Initially, they were 3 applicants : [[Demand Media]] (United TLD|United TLD Holdco Ltd.), [[Famous Four Media]] (dot Agency Limited) and [[AC Webconnecting Holding B.V.]].[[Verisign]] submitted a separate [[String Confusion Objection]] to the [[ICDR]] against each of the applicants for .cam, on the basis that Internet users would confuse the string with the popular [[.com]] string. In two of the three objections submitted, the panelist assigned to the case ruled in favor of the applicant, meaning the objection was dismissed. However, [[Verisign]] prevailed in the objection against [[Demand Media]]'s application. [[Demand Media]] appealed the decision and finally won. After an auction process, [http://www.acwebconnecting.com AC Webconnecting Holding B.V.]remained the sole applicant for the new gTLD.
    
[[Category:TLD]]
 
[[Category:TLD]]
 
[[Category:Technology New gTLDs|cam]]
 
[[Category:Technology New gTLDs|cam]]

Navigation menu