Difference between revisions of ".movie"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
 
# [[Amazon]]
 
# [[Amazon]]
 
===Previous Applicants===
 
===Previous Applicants===
# [[Radix]] (Webdeus Inc.), a subisdiary of [[Directi]], which has submitted 31 TLD applications. '''WITHDRAWN'''.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13042-afilias-dumps-mail-bid-and-three-other-new-gtld-withdrawals Afilias Dumps Mail bid and Three Other New gTLD Withdrawals, DomainIncite.com] Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref>
+
# [[Radix]] (Webdeus Inc.), a subisdiary of [[Directi]], which has submitted 31 TLD applications. '''WITHDRAWN'''.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/13042-afilias-dumps-mail-bid-and-three-other-new-gtld-withdrawals Afilias Dumps Mail bid and Three Other New gTLD Withdrawals, DomainIncite.com] Retrieved 15 May 2013</ref> First applicant to drop out of contention set, May 2013.
 
===GAC Early Warnings===
 
===GAC Early Warnings===
 
The applications from [[Amazon]] and [[Dish DBS Corporation]] were both issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>
 
The applications from [[Amazon]] and [[Dish DBS Corporation]] were both issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>
Line 40: Line 40:
 
[[Category:TLD]]
 
[[Category:TLD]]
 
[[Category:Media New gTLDs|movie]]
 
[[Category:Media New gTLDs|movie]]
 +
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 20:57, 15 May 2013

Status: Proposed
country: International
Type: Generic
Category: Media
Priority #: 623 - Motion Picture Domain Registry Pty Ltd
895 - Amazon
944 - STRAAT Investments (NU DOT CO LLC)
967 - Donuts (New Frostbite, LLC)
1112 - Dish DBS Corporation
1859 - Famous Four Media (dot Movie Limited)
1908 - Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)

More information: NTLDStatsLogo.png

.movie is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Current Applicants

  1. STRAAT Investments, the parent company of .co Internet submitted an application with the internet governing body to become the registry operator of the TLD. .Movie is one of the 13 new gTLDs applied for by the company. [1]
  2. Motion Picture Domain Registry Pty Ltd
  3. Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
  4. Famous Four Media (dot Movie Limited), has applied for 61 TLDs.[2] This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
  5. Donuts (New Frostbite, LLC), applied for 307 TLDs. This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
  6. Dish DBS Corporation
  7. Amazon

Previous Applicants

  1. Radix (Webdeus Inc.), a subisdiary of Directi, which has submitted 31 TLD applications. WITHDRAWN.[3] First applicant to drop out of contention set, May 2013.

GAC Early Warnings

The applications from Amazon and Dish DBS Corporation were both issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[4]

The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[5]

References