Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (view source)

Revision as of 20:50, 24 January 2022

10,561 bytes added ,  2 years ago
no edit summary
Line 448: Line 448:  
| 2, 3, 8, & 12
 
| 2, 3, 8, & 12
 
| The request also asked for GAC deliberations & records on the issue, which ICANN noted was not something they would normally be in possession of.
 
| The request also asked for GAC deliberations & records on the issue, which ICANN noted was not something they would normally be in possession of.
 +
|-
 +
| 4 August 2014
 +
| Donuts, Inc.; FairWinds Partners, LLC; Fegistry LLC; Famous Four Media Limited; Minds + Machines; and Radix FZC
 +
| All communications related to the successful [[Community Priority Evaluation]] (“CPE”)  of HOTEL Top-Level-Domain S.a.r.l.'s community application for [[.hotel]]; all communications related to the appointment of the CPE Panel that produced the Report. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/request-donuts-et-al-04aug14-en.pdf Full request]
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/about/transparency/20140804-01/response-donuts-et-al-03sep14-en.pdf Partial response & some context]
 +
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
 +
| The request made efforts to overcome possible conditions of nondisclosure. However, from the ICANN response: "Although your analysis in the Request concluded that no Conditions for Nondisclosure should apply, ICANN must independently undertake the analysis of each Condition as it applies to the documentation at issue, and make the final determination as to whether any Nondisclosure Conditions apply. Here, for example, ICANN cannot violate contractual conditions that require ICANN to maintain items as confidential solely because the Request proffers that no such conditions apply. Similarly, ICANN does not release draft documentation – particularly if draft documentation was shared for the purpose of facilitating deliberations or decision making – because drafts are not reliable sources of information regarding what actually occurred or standards that were actually applied."
 +
|-
 +
| 4 September 2014
 +
| Dot Registry LLC
 +
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/request-craven-weil-gotshal-manges-04sep14-en.pdf request] for a copy of the contract between [[Community Priority Evaluation]] provider Economist Intelligent Unit (EIU) and ICANN.
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/response-craven-weil-gotshal-manges-03oct14-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 2, 5, & 6
 +
| Another request that attempted to preempt the Defined Conditions of Disclosure
 +
|-
 +
| 17 September 2014
 +
| fTLD Registry Servies LLC
 +
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/request-craven-weil-gotshal-manges-17sep14-en.pdf request] for copies of any written agreements between ICANN and [[Donuts, Inc.]] regarding agreements to toll or extend deadlines for Donuts to file either a [[CEP]] or [[IRP]] request regarding the [[.insurance]] TLD
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/response-craven-weil-gotshal-manges-16oct14-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 2 & 6
 +
| The response notes that, in addition to the defined conditions of nondisclosure, the [[ICANN Bylaws]] expressly state that materials submitted as part of an IRP or CEP shall remain confidential
 +
|-
 +
| 26 September 2014
 +
| [[Afilias Limited]], BRS Media Inc., & Tin Dale, LLC
 +
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/lieben-request-26sep14-en.pdf request] for documents relating to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] Process generally, as well documents pertaining to the criteria, information reviewed, and other deliberative process related to the CPE for [[.radio]]
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/lieben-response-24oct14-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| 30 September 2014
 +
| [[Michael Palage]]
 +
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-request-30sep14-en.pdf request] for accounting and financial information regarding applications for [[Internationalized Domain Name|internationalized]] ccTLD strings, as well as information regarding ICANN's reporting processes, details of non-payment, and ICANN's treatment of non-payment.
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-response-30oct14-en.pdf Provided template email and accompanying invoice] that is sent to IDN ccTLD applicants; otherwise, declined to provide additional documents
 +
| 5, 6, & 11
 +
| ICANN noted that the differences in reporting of IDN application revenue was "a matter of formatting and not the result of an affirmative documented decision."
 +
|-
 +
| 21 October 2014
 +
| [[Kevin Murphy]]
 +
| Letter from Rod Beckstrom to Maria Del Rosario Guerra dated December 1, 2009, the response to which was listed on ICANN's correspondence page.
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/murphy-response-20nov14-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 1, 3, 5, 6, & 10
 +
| "Any other information [beyond what was already publicly available] regarding the redelegation process of the .CO ccTLD, including the 1 December Letter, is not appropriate for public disclosure"
 +
|-
 +
| 22 October 2014
 +
| [[Reg Levy]]
 +
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/levy-request-22oct14-en.pdf request] for documents relating to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] Process generally, as well documents pertaining to the criteria, information reviewed, and other deliberative process related to the CPE for [[.eco]]
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/levy-response-31oct14-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
 +
| Cites the prior DIDP regarding the [[.radio]] [[CPE]] in explaining its reasons for not disclosing information.
 +
|-
 +
| 22 October 2014
 +
| dotgay LLC
 +
| A [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/lieben-request-22oct14-en.pdf request] for documents relating to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] Process generally, as well documents pertaining to the criteria, information reviewed, and other deliberative process related to the CPE for [[.gay]]
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/lieben-response-31oct14-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
 +
| Again, cites the DIDP request for the [[.radio]] CPE to partially explain its rationales
 +
|-
 +
| 18 December 2014
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Detailed & categorized reports of expenses relating to travel and meetings for the years 1999-2014. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-request-18dec14-en.pdf Full request]
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-17jan15-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 12
 +
| Despite declining to produce additional documents, ICANN's response takes pains to identify public information that is responsive to the request
 +
|-
 +
| 22 December 2014
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Details of ICANN's income from domain names between 1999-2014. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-request-22dec14-en.pdf Full request]
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-21jan15-en.pdf Provided documentation from 2012 forward]
 +
| 12
 +
| ICANN adopted a new method of finacial reporting based on this DIDP request; however, earlier financial data was stored in a different system, and conversion of that data into a the new form of reporting would be overly burdensome (condition 12)
 +
|-
 +
| 24 December 2014
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Details of cyber attacks suffered by ICANN since 1999
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-23jan15-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, & 12
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| 26 December 2014
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Details of the cases that have been decided by the ICANN Ombudsman, as well as information related to the lack of reporting on the Ombudsman's page, the absence of case reporting since 2010, and other operational details.
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-ombudsman-response-27jan15-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 2, 8, 9, & 12
 +
| Staff provided links to public information, including the Ombudsman's annual report to the board.
 +
|-
 +
| 27 December 2014
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Information pertaining to the implementation of the [[NETMundial]] Principles
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-netmundial-response-27jan15-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, & 12
 +
| ICANN staff provided some context on the NETMundial principles, and provided links to public information regarding ICANN's participation in the Internet governance ecosystem. However, the response went on to state instead that it was not responsible for implementing the NETMundial Principles, and that the request was outside of ICANN's operational mandate.
 +
|-
 +
| 12 January 2015
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Information pertaining to the formation and operation of ICANN's Globalization Advisory Groups
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-globalization-advisory-response-11feb15-en.pdf Provided answers] regarding the dissolution of the groups
 +
| No
 +
| The [[IANA Functions Stewardship Transition]] spurred new community initiatives that were largely duplicative of the Globalization Advisory Groups. As a result, the groups were dissolved a month after they were created.
 +
|-
 +
| 12 January 2015
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Information relating to ICANN's [[Auctions of Last Resort|auctions]], including proceeds from auctions, complete bid histories (including losing bidders), and other operational information
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-09feb15-en.pdf All information already publicly available]
 +
| No
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| 13 January 2015
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Requesting an organizational chart for ICANN's leadership and management, as well as staffing information, internal team composition, and other details
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-organogram-response-11feb15-en.pdf Responded] that most of the requested information, if it existed, was already posted on the ICANN website.
 +
| No
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| 13 January 2015
 +
| Centre for Internet and Society
 +
| Expenses incurred and staffing resources allocated to the [[NETMundial]] conference, its resulting initiatives and its statement of principles; costs associated with travel, lodging, and other expenses specific to the conference; and ICANN staff hours committed to operations related to the NETMundial initiative
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-12feb15-en.pdf Declined]
 +
| 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, & 12
 +
| The response pointed to publicly available information, but declined to "create or compile" new reports or documents; also noted that NETMundial's website had posted or would soon post most of the information relevant to the CIS queries
 +
|-
 +
| 20 January 2015
 +
| Guru Acharya
 +
| Documents related to the “Continuity and Contingency Plan" (plan for transfer to a successor contractor) described in Section C.7.3 of ICANN's IANA Functions Contract with NTIA.
 +
| After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/acharya-response-19feb15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150120-1-2015-02-24-en document was published in March]
 +
| Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, & 9
 +
|
 
|}
 
|}
    
==References==
 
==References==
JP
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits

Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/Special:MobileDiff/1342193"

Navigation menu