Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sarah Langstone"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start fro...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say. | -In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Yeah, I do like the current position at the top and consistency with Title, Company, Timeframe ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Old Caricatures== | ||
| + | [[Image:SarahLangstoneCaricature.jpg|300px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:SarahlangstonePortrait.jpg|300px]] [[Image:SarahlangstoneCaricature.jpg|300px]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:22, 2 January 2014
-In the career history section it seems that the title followed by the company and the time frame make for a more accessible format. I also think it makes more sense to start from the present and work backward, though I'd be interested to hear what others have to say.
- Yeah, I do like the current position at the top and consistency with Title, Company, Timeframe ...
Old Caricatures
