Changes

* whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/>

* whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/>

::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.”

::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.”

* the backlog of unimplemented policies, some of which are now out-of-date or conflict with current work <br/>

* The backlog of unimplemented policies, some of which are now out-of-date or conflict with current work <br/>

::[[Mason Cole]] worried "How big a danger to the model is unfinished work? The community has expectations regarding completing work...the [[SSR1]] recommendations are nearly a decade old...This is like dragging weight around unnecessarily." Likewise, [[James Bladel]] said, "There is too much emphasis on process and not enough on relevance."  

::[[Mason Cole]] worried "How big a danger to the model is unfinished work? The community has expectations regarding completing work...the [[SSR1]] recommendations are nearly a decade old...This is like dragging weight around unnecessarily." Likewise, [[James Bladel]] said, "There is too much emphasis on process and not enough on relevance."  

* How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/>

* How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/>

:: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners.  

:: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners.

====Impact of Regulatory Developments====

====Impact of Regulatory Developments====