Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  3 years ago
Line 22: Line 22:  
* The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/>
 
* The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/>
 
::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard: Full Consensus, to the next level: General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates."  
 
::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard: Full Consensus, to the next level: General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates."  
* whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/>
+
* Whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/>
 
::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.”
 
::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.”
 
* The backlog of unimplemented policies, some of which are now out-of-date or conflict with current work <br/>
 
* The backlog of unimplemented policies, some of which are now out-of-date or conflict with current work <br/>
Line 28: Line 28:  
* How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/>
 
* How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/>
 
:: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners.
 
:: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners.
 +
====Impact of Regulatory Developments====
   −
====Impact of Regulatory Developments====
   
====Reputation Block Lists====
 
====Reputation Block Lists====
  
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
14,952

edits

Navigation menu