14,952
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: − + Line 28:
Line 28: +
→Multistakeholder Model Evolution
===Plenaries===
===Plenaries===
====Multistakeholder Model Evolution====
====Multistakeholder Model Evolution====
The discussions mainly focused on:
The discussion mainly focused on:
* The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/>
* The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/>
::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard: Full Consensus, to the next level: General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates."
::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard: Full Consensus, to the next level: General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates."
* How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/>
* How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/>
:: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners.
:: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners.
====Impact of Regulatory Developments====
====Impact of Regulatory Developments====