Changes

<blockquote>[T]he Corporation shall, except as limited by Article 5 hereof, pursue the charitable and public purposes of lessening the burdens of government and promoting the global public interest in the operational stability of the Internet by (i) coordinating the assignment of Internet technical parameters as needed to maintain universal connectivity on the Internet; (ii) performing and overseeing functions related to the coordination of the Internet Protocol ("IP") address space; (iii) performing and overseeing functions related to the coordination of the Internet domain name system ("DNS"), including the development of policies for determining the circumstances under which new top-level domains are added to the DNS root system; (iv) overseeing operation of the authoritative Internet DNS root server system; and (v) engaging in any other related lawful activity in furtherance of items (i) through (iv).<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/articles-2012-02-25-en ICANN.org - Articles of Incorporation], effective as of November 1998</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>[T]he Corporation shall, except as limited by Article 5 hereof, pursue the charitable and public purposes of lessening the burdens of government and promoting the global public interest in the operational stability of the Internet by (i) coordinating the assignment of Internet technical parameters as needed to maintain universal connectivity on the Internet; (ii) performing and overseeing functions related to the coordination of the Internet Protocol ("IP") address space; (iii) performing and overseeing functions related to the coordination of the Internet domain name system ("DNS"), including the development of policies for determining the circumstances under which new top-level domains are added to the DNS root system; (iv) overseeing operation of the authoritative Internet DNS root server system; and (v) engaging in any other related lawful activity in furtherance of items (i) through (iv).<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/articles-2012-02-25-en ICANN.org - Articles of Incorporation], effective as of November 1998</ref></blockquote>

During the [[2002 Evolution and Reform Process]], the Evo & Reform Committee recommended the establishment of a mission statement and enumerated core values within the [[ICANN Bylaws]]. The bylaws as amended in December 2002 reflected the value of "[s]eeking and supporting broad, informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and cultural diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and decision-making."<ref name="02bylaws">[https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/bylaws-2002-12-15-en#I ICANN Bylaws, Article I], as amended December 2002</ref> The call to engage all corners of the globe is one aspect of service to a global public interest. However, the adopted core values name the "public interest" in another context: "Introducing and promoting competition in the registration of domain names where practicable and beneficial in the public interest."<ref name="02bylaws" /> These two values - [[Global Inclusion Initiatives|global inclusion]] and [[First Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review|competition & consumer choice]] - form a pair of values that could be seen to comprise the "global public interest." The values can be in competition, as one presumes participation by all who wish to engage, and the other defines its constituency as "consumers" - individuals who are entering the commercial sphere of domain ownership, management, or administration. As enshrined in ICANN's Articles of Incorporation, ICANN's technical obligations - to maintain a [[ICANN Initiatives|secure, stable, and resilient DNS]] - is also considered a protection of a global commons.

During the [[2002 Evolution and Reform Process]], the Evo & Reform Committee recommended the establishment of a mission statement and enumerated core values within the [[ICANN Bylaws]]. The bylaws as amended in December 2002 reflected the value of "[s]eeking and supporting broad, informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and cultural diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and decision-making."<ref name="02bylaws">[https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/bylaws-2002-12-15-en#I ICANN Bylaws, Article I], as amended December 2002</ref> The call to engage all corners of the globe is one aspect of service to a global public interest. However, the adopted core values name the "public interest" in another context: "Introducing and promoting competition in the registration of domain names where practicable and beneficial in the public interest."<ref name="02bylaws" /> These two values - [[Global Inclusion Initiatives|global inclusion]] and [[First Competition and Consumer Choice Review|competition & consumer choice]] - form a pair of values that could be seen to comprise the "global public interest." The values can be in competition, as one presumes participation by all who wish to engage, and the other defines its constituency as "consumers" - individuals who are entering the commercial sphere of domain ownership, management, or administration. As enshrined in ICANN's Articles of Incorporation, ICANN's technical obligations - to maintain a [[ICANN Initiatives|secure, stable, and resilient DNS]] - is also considered a protection of a global commons.

The 2009 [[Affirmation of Commitments]] further cemented these values. Section 9 lists the three commitments described above:

The 2009 [[Affirmation of Commitments]] further cemented these values. Section 9 lists the three commitments described above:

* Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of global Internet users;

* Ensuring accountability, transparency and the interests of global Internet users;

* Preserving security, stability and resiliency;

* Preserving security, stability and resiliency;

* Promoting competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/affirmation-of-commitments-2009-09-30-en Affirmation of Commitments], September 30, 2009</ref>

* Promoting competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/affirmation-of-commitments-2009-09-30-en Affirmation of Commitments], September 30, 2009.</ref>

In 2010, in the wake of the Affirmation of Commitments, legal scholar Emily Wilsdon characterized the architecture of ICANN as a "hybrid public-private regulator:"

In 2010, in the wake of the Affirmation of Commitments, legal scholar Emily Wilsdon characterized the architecture of ICANN as a "hybrid public-private regulator:"

<blockquote>In the end, ICANN displays features characteristic of a hybrid public-private regulator. Authority is formally delegated by the US, but importance is placed on the acceptance of ICANN as legitimate by the wider community (including technical experts). It is formed as a corporation, and regulates on a contractual basis. However, it is charged (legally) with pursuing the global public interest due to the way in which it was set up as a non-profit organization, and is essentially a monopoly. Institutional design has been approached from the start, and through successive reforms, with democratic norms in mind.<ref name="regroot">[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1632885 SSRN.com] - Regulating the Root: The Role of ICANN as Regulator, and Accountability; 2010</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>In the end, ICANN displays features characteristic of a hybrid public-private regulator. Authority is formally delegated by the US, but importance is placed on the acceptance of ICANN as legitimate by the wider community (including technical experts). It is formed as a corporation, and regulates on a contractual basis. However, it is charged (legally) with pursuing the global public interest due to the way in which it was set up as a non-profit organization, and is essentially a monopoly. Institutional design has been approached from the start, and through successive reforms, with democratic norms in mind.<ref name="regroot">[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1632885 SSRN.com] - Regulating the Root: The Role of ICANN as Regulator, and Accountability; 2010</ref></blockquote>

The revised bylaws added "global public interest" to the core value describing global outreach and participation:

The revised bylaws added "global public interest" to the core value describing global outreach and participation:

<blockquote>Seeking and supporting broad, informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and cultural diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and decision-making to ensure that the bottom-up, multistakeholder policy development process is used to ascertain the global public interest and that those processes are accountable and transparent;<ref name="16bylaws">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/bylaws-2016-09-30-en ICANN Bylaws], as amended October 1, 2016</ref></blockquote>

<blockquote>Seeking and supporting broad, informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and cultural diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and decision-making to ensure that the bottom-up, multistakeholder policy development process is used to ascertain the global public interest and that those processes are accountable and transparent;<ref name="16bylaws">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/bylaws-2016-09-30-en ICANN Bylaws], as amended October 1, 2016</ref></blockquote>

The "global public interest" also became a subject of the ICANN Board's deliberations on decisions, as well as a basis for the [[ICANN Empowered Community|Empowered Community]] to object to board actions.<ref name="16bylaws" /> The board is now expected to articulate its rationale for its decisions as they impact the global public interest. For its part, the Empowered Community can call out decisions that failed to take such considerations into account.

The "global public interest" also became a subject of the ICANN Board's deliberations on decisions, as well as a basis for the [[ICANN Empowered Community]] to object to board actions.<ref name="16bylaws" />

In 2018, the [[ICANN Board]] identified the GPI as one of its 2019 operational priorities and carried it over to 2021.  

In 2018, the [[ICANN Board]] identified the GPI as one of its 2019 operational priorities and carried it over to 2021.  

==GPI Toolkit==

==GPI Toolkit==

[[File:GPI Framework Process.jpg|655px|thumbnail|right|GPI Framework (from GPI Toolkit, ICANN.org)]]The GPI Toolkit, which is shepherded by [[Avri Doria]] in its pilot version application for the [[SSAD]] and [[SUBPRO]] [[ODP]]s, is meant to systematically assess the determination of GPI when considering new actions.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit GPI Toolkit, ICANN Community]</ref>

[[File:GPI Framework Process.jpg|655px|thumbnail|right|GPI Framework (from GPI Toolkit, ICANN.org)]]The GPI Toolkit, which is shepherded by [[Avri Doria]] in its pilot version application for the [[SSAD]] and [[SUBPRO]] [[ODP]]s, is meant to systematically assess the determination of GPI when considering new actions.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit GPI Toolkit, ICANN Community]</ref>

==References==

==References==

{{reflist}}

{{reflist}}