Changes

In September, 2011, Mr. Cahn updated his claims of breach of contract and fraud after a judge tossed out his original claim. The new claim now contains specific language on how Oversee.net allegedly affected Moniker's revenue. He now states that the original acquisition was in violation of an agreement between [[Google]] and Oversee, and that Oversee improperly deflated Moniker's revenue and performance numbers.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/09/08/monte-cahn-updates-lawsuit-against-oversee-net-with-new-details/ Monte Cahn Updates Lawsuit, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

In September, 2011, Mr. Cahn updated his claims of breach of contract and fraud after a judge tossed out his original claim. The new claim now contains specific language on how Oversee.net allegedly affected Moniker's revenue. He now states that the original acquisition was in violation of an agreement between [[Google]] and Oversee, and that Oversee improperly deflated Moniker's revenue and performance numbers.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/09/08/monte-cahn-updates-lawsuit-against-oversee-net-with-new-details/ Monte Cahn Updates Lawsuit, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

In November, 2011, Oversee requested summary judgement on matters pertaining to Monte Cahn's allegations over his Management Incentive Plan. This action does not affect all parts of their standing legal battle, specifically Mr. Cahn's potential breach of contract for selling restaurants.com. Oversee does claim that no targets were met in Monte's Management Incentive Plan, and thus that they owe him none of the $13 million guaranteed as a bonus under the MIP.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/17/oversee-net-we-dont-owe-monte-cahn-anything-for-13m-management-incentive-plan/ Oversee.net We Dont Owe Monte Cahn Anything, DomainNameWire.com]</ref> Mr. Cahn expectedly countered this claim.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/23/monte-cahn-files-third-ammended-complaint-against-oversee-net/ Monte Cahn Files Third Ammended Complain Against Oversee, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

In November, 2011, Oversee requested summary judgement on matters pertaining to Monte Cahn's allegations over his Management Incentive Plan. This action does not affect all parts of their standing legal battle, specifically Mr. Cahn's potential breach of contract for selling restaurants.com. However, Oversee claimed that no targets were met in Monte's Management Incentive Plan, and thus that they owe him none of the $13 million guaranteed as a bonus under the MIP.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/17/oversee-net-we-dont-owe-monte-cahn-anything-for-13m-management-incentive-plan/ Oversee.net We Dont Owe Monte Cahn Anything, DomainNameWire.com]</ref> Mr. Cahn expectedly countered this claim.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2011/11/23/monte-cahn-files-third-ammended-complaint-against-oversee-net/ Monte Cahn Files Third Ammended Complain Against Oversee, DomainNameWire.com]</ref>

==References==

==References==