.law: Difference between revisions
Simoncousins (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m Reverted edits by GovernanceBot (talk) to last revision by Dustin Loup Tag: Rollback |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|community = | |community = | ||
| website = [http://mmx.co mmx.co] | | website = [http://mmx.co mmx.co] | ||
|priority = | |priority = | ||
|keypeople = | |keypeople = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''.law''' is a generic top level domain name ([[gTLD]]) for the legal industry proposed to the [[New gTLD Program]] of [[ICANN]]. After a private auction in September 2014, [[Minds + Machines Group Limited|MMX]], also known as [[Minds and Machines, LLC|Minds + Machines]], won the rights to the string over the other applicants. | |||
'''.law''' is a | ==Intended Use== | ||
'''.law''' is a restricted top-level domain open only to qualified lawyers and law firms world-wide. Application for a '''.law''' domain independent third party verification. | |||
== | ==Delegation Status== | ||
. | .'''law''' was delegated to the [[Root Zone]] of the [[DNS]] on the 18 June 2015, completing the successful application for the string | ||
== | ==Notable Users== | ||
The '''.law''' top-level domain gives legal professionals the ability to increase their online presence and rebrand their practices and the legal services industry on the Internet using an industry focussed domain as a distinct, official, and trusted domain for the legal profession. | |||
===Previous Applicants | ==Current Applicant== | ||
[[Minds + Machines Group Limited|MMX]], also known as [[Minds and Machines, LLC|Minds + Machines]], applied for '''.law''' whcih was one of 68 TLDs that the company applied for on its own behalf.<ref>[http://www.tldh.org/2012/06/gtld-application-update-92-applications-submitted/ gTLD application update: 92 applications submitted]</ref> This applicant submitted a [[PIC|Public Interest Commitment]], which can be downloaded [https://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/applicationdetails/1720 here]. | |||
==Previous Applicants== | |||
# [[Radix]]- a subsidiary company of the [[Directi]] Group, which has applied for 31 new TLDs. The company partnered with [[ARI Registry Services]] to serve as back-end registry solutions provider.<ref> | # [[Radix]]- a subsidiary company of the [[Directi]] Group, which has applied for 31 new TLDs. The company partnered with [[ARI Registry Services]] to serve as back-end registry solutions provider.<ref> | ||
[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/05/31/directi-invest-over-30-million-applies-for-31-new-gtlds-including-law-web-bank-shop/ http://www.thedomains.com/2012/05/31/directi-invest-over-30-million-applies-for-31-new-gtlds-including-law-web-bank-shop/]</ref> | [http://www.thedomains.com/2012/05/31/directi-invest-over-30-million-applies-for-31-new-gtlds-including-law-web-bank-shop/ http://www.thedomains.com/2012/05/31/directi-invest-over-30-million-applies-for-31-new-gtlds-including-law-web-bank-shop/]</ref> | ||
Line 36: | Line 41: | ||
# [[Merchant Law Group LLP]] | # [[Merchant Law Group LLP]] | ||
==Radix== | |||
Radix received a [[GAC]] Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref> | Radix received a [[GAC]] Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/RadixReg-US-31.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353452704000 RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Nov 2012</ref> | ||
== | ==MMX & $15mm Auction Funding== | ||
On February 26 2013, [[ | On February 26 2013, [[Minds + Machines Group Limited|MMX]] announced that it had entered into a funding agreement worth $15 million to be used in the case of auction for a specific unnamed TLD. The investor will not receive ownership of the TLD but a share of future revenues. TLDH did not name the TLD that the funds are directed for, and it is in 11 head to head contentions and 12 featuring more than one contender.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/02/26/tldh-gets-up-to-15-million-for-a-single-top-level-domain-name-auction/ TLDh Gets 15 Million for A Single Top Level Domain Name Auction, DomainNameWire.com] Published and Retrieved 26 Feb 2013</ref> | ||
==Private Auction== | |||
In a [[private auction]] that occurred in September 2014, | In a [[private auction]] that occurred in September 2014, [[Minds + Machines Group Limited|MMX]] (Minds + Machines) announced that it had won the rights to the string over the other applicants. In the same month, [[Minds + Machines Group Limited|MMX]] announced they had also won an auction for [[.vip]] and lost auctions for [[.design]], [[.flowers]], [[.group]], [[.realestate]] and [[.video]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/17418-afilias-loses-chinese-info-as-seven-more-new-gtld-auctions-conclude Seven More New gTLD Auctions Conclude] ''DomainIncite'' by Kevin Murphy; Retrieved 24 September 2014</ref> | ||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:TLD]] | [[Category:TLD]] | ||
[[Category:Professional New gTLDs|law]] | [[Category:Professional New gTLDs|law]] |
Latest revision as of 18:47, 7 May 2024
Status: | Proposed |
country: | International |
Type: | Generic TLD |
Category: | Professional |
Website: | mmx.co |
More information: |
.law is a generic top level domain name (gTLD) for the legal industry proposed to the New gTLD Program of ICANN. After a private auction in September 2014, MMX, also known as Minds + Machines, won the rights to the string over the other applicants.
Intended Use[edit | edit source]
.law is a restricted top-level domain open only to qualified lawyers and law firms world-wide. Application for a .law domain independent third party verification.
Delegation Status[edit | edit source]
.law was delegated to the Root Zone of the DNS on the 18 June 2015, completing the successful application for the string
Notable Users[edit | edit source]
The .law top-level domain gives legal professionals the ability to increase their online presence and rebrand their practices and the legal services industry on the Internet using an industry focussed domain as a distinct, official, and trusted domain for the legal profession.
Current Applicant[edit | edit source]
MMX, also known as Minds + Machines, applied for .law whcih was one of 68 TLDs that the company applied for on its own behalf.[1] This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
Previous Applicants[edit | edit source]
- Radix- a subsidiary company of the Directi Group, which has applied for 31 new TLDs. The company partnered with ARI Registry Services to serve as back-end registry solutions provider.[2]
- STRAAT Investments, a holding company founded & chaired by Juan Diego Calle and the parent company of .co Internet is also interested to become the registry operator of .law. The domain name string is part of the 13 new gTLDs applied for by the company with ICANN. Neustar will provide the back-end registry solutions for the TLD.[3]
- Donuts (Corn Dynamite, LLC), one of 307 TLDs applied for by the company. This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
- Famous Four Media (Silver Registry Limited) - This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
- Merchant Law Group LLP
Radix[edit | edit source]
Radix received a GAC Early Warning as an entire applicant, where each one of the applicants was flagged by the U.S. Government. This seems to be the only time a portfolio applicant had all of their applications warned. The issue does not deal with the technical capabilities or thematic content of their applications, but rather the inclusion of an email address associated with the US' Federal Bureau of Investigation. It seems that Radix included correspondence with this address as a recommendation with each of their applications.[4]
MMX & $15mm Auction Funding[edit | edit source]
On February 26 2013, MMX announced that it had entered into a funding agreement worth $15 million to be used in the case of auction for a specific unnamed TLD. The investor will not receive ownership of the TLD but a share of future revenues. TLDH did not name the TLD that the funds are directed for, and it is in 11 head to head contentions and 12 featuring more than one contender.[5]
Private Auction[edit | edit source]
In a private auction that occurred in September 2014, MMX (Minds + Machines) announced that it had won the rights to the string over the other applicants. In the same month, MMX announced they had also won an auction for .vip and lost auctions for .design, .flowers, .group, .realestate and .video.[6]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ gTLD application update: 92 applications submitted
- ↑ http://www.thedomains.com/2012/05/31/directi-invest-over-30-million-applies-for-31-new-gtlds-including-law-web-bank-shop/
- ↑ Parent company of .Co Internet applies for 13 top level domains (here’s the list)
- ↑ RadixReg. GACweb.ICANN.org Retrieved 27 Nov 2012
- ↑ TLDh Gets 15 Million for A Single Top Level Domain Name Auction, DomainNameWire.com Published and Retrieved 26 Feb 2013
- ↑ Seven More New gTLD Auctions Conclude DomainIncite by Kevin Murphy; Retrieved 24 September 2014