Interim Policy Oversight Committee: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Christiane (talk | contribs) m Christiane moved page IPOC to Interim Policy Oversight Committee: Standardize |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''iPOC''' is the abbreviation for '''gTLD-MoU Interim Policy Oversight Committee''', which was formed under the provisions of the [[gTLD-MoU]].<ref>[http://www.corenic.org/articles_of_association.htm corenic.org]</ref> The gTLD-MoU is the international framework with which policies for the enhancement and administration of the Internet’s generic Domain Name System ([[DNS]]) are developed.<ref>[http://www.gtld-mou.org/ gtld-mou.org]</ref> The iPOC was established to oversee the Council of Registrars ([[CORE]]) and CORE-[[gTLD]]s, and to set policies for CORE and its Registrars in accordance with the gTLD-MoU. <ref>[http://www.itu.int/net-itu/gtld-mou/gTLD-MoU.htm itu.int]</ref> | |||
'''iPOC''' is the abbreviation for '''gTLD-MoU Interim Policy Oversight Committee''', which was formed under the provisions of the gTLD-MoU <ref>[http://www.corenic.org/articles_of_association.htm corenic.org]</ref> | |||
The iPOC was | |||
== Members == | == Members == | ||
The task of appointing members for this interim committee was handed over to the Internet Society (ISOC). | The task of appointing members for this interim committee was handed over to the Internet Society ([[ISOC]]). ISOC was requested to appoint two people, one for one year and the other for a period of three years. The members selected by the ISOC were those who had fair amount of experience in Internet Technology and shared a global outlook.<ref name="link4">[http://www.isoc.org/isoc/media/releases/gTLD-MoU-POC.shtml isoc.org]</ref> | ||
== Term of members of iPOC == | == Term of members of iPOC == | ||
The regular tenure of the members of | The regular tenure of the members of iPOC lasts for three years. However, initially the term of the members of iPOC was kept as follows: | ||
* One year- for one representative from each - CORE, IANA, ISOC, IAB | * One year- for one representative from each - [[CORE]], [[IANA]], [[ISOC]], [[IAB]] | ||
* Two years- for | * Two years- for representatives of the MoU Depository, [[WIPO]], [[INTA]], [[ITU]] | ||
* Three years- for one representative from each – CORE, IANA, ISOC, IAB <ref name="link4">[http://www.isoc.org/isoc/media/releases/gTLD-MoU-POC.shtml isoc.org]</ref> | * Three years- for one representative from each – [[CORE]], [[IANA]], [[ISOC]], [[IAB]]<ref name="link4">[http://www.isoc.org/isoc/media/releases/gTLD-MoU-POC.shtml isoc.org]</ref> | ||
== Objective == | == Objective == | ||
The main objective of iPOC was to | The main objective of iPOC was to coordinate with the Executive Committee of the Council of Registrars (CORE) to see to it that all registrars operated in conjunction with the requirements set forth by the MoU and CORE-MoU.<ref name="link4">[http://www.isoc.org/isoc/media/releases/gTLD-MoU-POC.shtml isoc.org]</ref> | ||
== Power == | == Power == | ||
The Policy Oversight Committee has been assigned with the following powers: | |||
* | * Approve the names of new gTLDs as well as change the number of gTLDs. | ||
* Change the number of | * Change the number of registrars, but only after assuring that the global geographic distribution of registrars is not hampered. | ||
* | * Set new terms and conditions for applications by entities who desire to become registrars, which also includes provisions for CORE to set up and collect fees for registration or any other service that it may perform when required. | ||
* Recommend to the PAB | * Recommend to the PAB amendments to MoU, which might include, but is not restricted to, changes in the composition of iPOC. | ||
* It can | * It can remove registrars who don’t operate consistently as per the requirements of the MoU and the CORE-MoU. However, iPOC can do this only after consulting the CORE and PAB. | ||
== Working == | == Working == | ||
iPOC carries out all its responsibilities under the consultation of the gTLD-MoU Policy Advisory Body (PAB) and CORE. The iPOC follows only those norms and practices that serve a public trust function. It requires a minimum of 67% of votes to come to any decision and none of its decisions are taken unless it has a representation of a minimum of 67% of members.<ref name="link4">[http://www.isoc.org/isoc/media/releases/gTLD-MoU-POC.shtml isoc.org]</ref> | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
| Line 37: | Line 34: | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[ | |||
[[Category: Glossary]] | |||
[[Category: Organizations]] | |||
[[Category: Acronym]] | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Latest revision as of 01:05, 19 June 2024
iPOC is the abbreviation for gTLD-MoU Interim Policy Oversight Committee, which was formed under the provisions of the gTLD-MoU.[1] The gTLD-MoU is the international framework with which policies for the enhancement and administration of the Internet’s generic Domain Name System (DNS) are developed.[2] The iPOC was established to oversee the Council of Registrars (CORE) and CORE-gTLDs, and to set policies for CORE and its Registrars in accordance with the gTLD-MoU. [3]
Members[edit | edit source]
The task of appointing members for this interim committee was handed over to the Internet Society (ISOC). ISOC was requested to appoint two people, one for one year and the other for a period of three years. The members selected by the ISOC were those who had fair amount of experience in Internet Technology and shared a global outlook.[4]
Term of members of iPOC[edit | edit source]
The regular tenure of the members of iPOC lasts for three years. However, initially the term of the members of iPOC was kept as follows:
- One year- for one representative from each - CORE, IANA, ISOC, IAB
- Two years- for representatives of the MoU Depository, WIPO, INTA, ITU
- Three years- for one representative from each – CORE, IANA, ISOC, IAB[4]
Objective[edit | edit source]
The main objective of iPOC was to coordinate with the Executive Committee of the Council of Registrars (CORE) to see to it that all registrars operated in conjunction with the requirements set forth by the MoU and CORE-MoU.[4]
Power[edit | edit source]
The Policy Oversight Committee has been assigned with the following powers:
- Approve the names of new gTLDs as well as change the number of gTLDs.
- Change the number of registrars, but only after assuring that the global geographic distribution of registrars is not hampered.
- Set new terms and conditions for applications by entities who desire to become registrars, which also includes provisions for CORE to set up and collect fees for registration or any other service that it may perform when required.
- Recommend to the PAB amendments to MoU, which might include, but is not restricted to, changes in the composition of iPOC.
- It can remove registrars who don’t operate consistently as per the requirements of the MoU and the CORE-MoU. However, iPOC can do this only after consulting the CORE and PAB.
Working[edit | edit source]
iPOC carries out all its responsibilities under the consultation of the gTLD-MoU Policy Advisory Body (PAB) and CORE. The iPOC follows only those norms and practices that serve a public trust function. It requires a minimum of 67% of votes to come to any decision and none of its decisions are taken unless it has a representation of a minimum of 67% of members.[4]
References[edit | edit source]