Talk:Ajit Sharma: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 01:50, 10 January 2011

What to do in these instances when it seems all we have is information copied rather driectly over from LinkdIn? Do we benefit by regurgitating all the info over from LinkdIn, even though their format seems better suited to it?

yeah good question, I think the key for us is consistency in format, interlinking with other articles and how the person is involved with ICANN. So as we have articles for more companies and constituencies, career summaries from LinkedIn should be considerably more valuable here.

Revision as of 22:05, 9 January 2011 view source Apm (talk \| contribs) 264 edits Created page with "What to do in these instances when it seems all we have is information copied rather driectly over from LinkdIn? Do we benefit by regurgitating all the info over from LinkdIn, ev..."		Latest revision as of 01:50, 10 January 2011 view source Ray (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, staff, Administrators 3,010 edits No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What to do in these instances when it seems all we have is information copied rather driectly over from LinkdIn? Do we benefit by regurgitating all the info over from LinkdIn, even though their format seems better suited to it?		What to do in these instances when it seems all we have is information copied rather driectly over from LinkdIn? Do we benefit by regurgitating all the info over from LinkdIn, even though their format seems better suited to it?

			: yeah good question, I think the key for us is consistency in format, interlinking with other articles and how the person is involved with ICANN. So as we have articles for more companies and constituencies, career summaries from LinkedIn should be considerably more valuable here.