ICANN 58 Quick Guide

ICANN 58 Quick Guide
Welcome to København

Get Involved!

Gender Equity

Global Issues

Acronyms

As usual, we’ve primed this edition of the ICANNWiki Quick Guide to be a helpful aid to newcomers--which means an introduction on how to get involved in ICANN, a whole new slew of expanded and explained acronyms, a feature on gender equity in tech organizations as well as an exhibition of the numerous capacity building projects making the Internet a better place. We also built this Quick Guide to honor members of our community who weren’t able to make it to this meeting--which means crafting another creative mural. From cover to cover, we’ve lovingly crafted a comprehensive primer for newcomers. We hope you enjoy, and most importantly, learn something new and useful.

• 
  ICANN 58 - Quickie -- DOWNLOAD .PDF
• 
  The Gender Digital Divide (March 2017)
  VIEW ALL INFOGRAPHICS

Get Involved

Three times a year, ICANN’s Multistakeholder Community gathers for meetings in different regions of the world. These meetings are free and open to all, including remote participants. With around thousands of participants, hundreds of sessions and various stakeholder groups, navigating ICANN as a newcomer can be difficult, but the ICANNWiki Primers are a helpful place to start your ICANN journey.

LEARN: Learn how ICANN is structured and operates by taking a course on ICANN Learn, researching with ICANNWiki’s multilingual encyclopedic resource, and exploring the vast amount of documents and information on icann.org.

FOLLOW: Follow the latest policy discussions by subscribing to some mailing lists or reading the archives. Many of the lists are publicly available, but some may be restricted to members of the Working Group.

BE HEARD: Comment on policy proposals through ICANN’s public comment platform. Each proposal is open for a minimum of 40 days for community comments. At ICANN Meetings, you can also make comments at the Public Forums.

Get Involved With One of ICANN's Structures

ICANN’s Multistakeholder Community consists of seven structures, classified as Supporting Organizations (SO) and Advisory Committees (AC). Each of the seven structures have different compositions and criteria to join. Newcomers looking for a way to contribute to ICANN’s multi-stakeholder, bottom-up, consensus driven model for policy development should start with the GNSO or ALAC.

Supporting Organizations

GNSO: The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) is the main policy-making body in ICANN. It brings together various stakeholder groups to develop and recommend policies to the ICANN Board concerning generic top-level domains (gTLDs). To learn more, visit gnso.icann.org

ccNSO: The Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) is open to and comprised of the managers responsible for operating country-code top-level domains (ccTLDs). It develop and recommends policies relating to ccTLDs. To learn more visit ccnso.icann.org.

ASO: The Address Supporting Organization (ASO) represents the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs). It is tasked with reviewing and developing Internet Protocol address policy and advise the Board accordingly. ASO Membership is only available to RIRs. Learn more at aso.icann.org.

Advisory Committees

ALAC: The At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) functions as the voice for the individual Internet user as it relates to ICANN processes, policy and more and advises the Board accordingly. It is formed of smaller groups At-Large Structures that are part of Regional At-Large Organizations To learn more, visit atlarge.icann.org.

SSAC: The Security and Stability Advisory Committee is composed of technical experts from industry and academia and advises the Board on the security and integrity of the Internet’s naming and address allocation systems. The SSAC is an invite-only organization, but you can learn more about their work at ssac.icann.org.

GAC: The Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) iscomprised of formally appointed governmental representatives and is responsible for providing advice to the Board relating to the concerns of governments, including how ICANN policies interact with laws and international agreements. To learn more, visit gac.icann.org.

RSSAC: The Root Server System Advisory Committee is made up of representatives from the organization responsible for operating the 13 root name servers and advises the Board on issues related to the operation, administration, security, and integrity of the Internet’s Root Server. To learn more, visit rssac.icann.org.

Pick an Issue & Join a Working Group!

Find something that interests you, learn more about it and join a Working Group! Policy Development at ICANN addresses many important issues related to the DNS. The following topics are just a few suggestions. If none of these seem like the right fit, don’t worry! There are many more opportunities out there.

At-Large Review

The ICANN Bylaws require periodic review of ICANN’s Structure and Operations at a minimum of every five years. The second At-Large Review began in May 2016 and was carried out by ITEMS International.

Over the course of nine months, ITEMS conducted 100 face-to-face interviews, received 242 online survey responses, reviewed the At-Large website, including relevant documents and observed the At-Large meetings at ICANN56 and ICANN57. Using this analysis, they released a draft report, which was opened for Public Comment on 1 Feb 2017 and closes 24 March 2017. Based on the feedback from the community, ITEMS will make the appropriate updates and submit a final report.

The draft report proposed 16 recommendations to help improve the structure of the At-Large community and the efficiency in fulfilling its mission. The recommendations included finding ways to empower the end users through a few changes to the leadership structure, introducing an Empowered Membership Model, and more.

If you are interested in learning more or providing input at ICANN58, the review will be discussed at several workshops, including the following:

ALAC AND REGIONAL LEADERS - WORKING SESSION PART 6 Sunday, 12 March - 11:00-12:45 - Hall C1.3

AT-LARGE REVIEW WORKING PARTY Tuesday, 14 March - 11:00-12:45 - Hall C1.3

AT-LARGE REVIEW: WORKSHOP WITH INDEPENDENT EXAMINER (ITEMS) Wednesday, 15 March - 15:15-16:45 - Hall A3

(Dates and times of workshops are subject to change. Please check the ICANN conference schedule prior to attending any workshop.)

Next-Generation Registration Directory to Replace WHOIS

WHOIS was developed in the early 1980s as a directory of contact information for anyone using the ARPANET. It collects registration data on all gTLDs, including the registrant’s name, address, phone number, email address, etc.

As the Internet became a global, commercial resource,the uses and purpose of WHOIS changed, but the protocol and data required by registrants remained mostly unchanged. Consequently, it has been a long-standing source of discussion and debate in the ICANN Community and despite nearly 15 years of work in the GNSO, comprehensive reform has yet to happen, despite the continuous discussions on things like purpose, accuracy, access, privacy and data protection, law enforcement, malicious use and abuse, and more.

In 2012, the WHOIS Policy Review Team’s released its final report that outlined a set of recommendations to ensure that WHOIS policy is effective, meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust. Shortly after the final report, the SSAC issued a response that stressed the importance of “understanding the purpose of domain name registration data” before any meaningful, comprehensive solution can be reached. In response the ICANN Board resolved to take a two-pronged approach of:

(1) enhancing existing policies; (2) reexamining the purpose of domain name registration data and considering safeguards for that data.

On Track 1, much of the work has been completed, although several issues of implementation are outstanding. On Track 2, the process is in its early stages. In April 2015, the ICANN Board requested a Board-initiated GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) to define the purpose of the collection, maintenance and access to gTLD registration data, as well as consider safeguards for protecting this data. The PDP Working Group (PDP WG) identified a preliminary list of possible requirements for gTLD registration directory services (RDS) in order to inform the discussion on the following two questions:

(1) What are the fundamental requirements for gTLD registration data and directory services? (2) Is a new policy framework and next-generation RDS needed to address these requirements?

After deliberating over several of the possible requirements, the WG decided it would be more effective to begin discussion with sub-questions relating to the topics of User/Purposes, Data Elements, and Privacy. Deliberations on these sub questions will seek to identify and reach a rough consensus on the possible requirements for RDS and key concepts.

In these deliberations, important issues are currently being discussed, such as “Should gTLD registration thin data be accessible for any purpose or only for specific purposes?” and other questions that will affect every gTLD registrant.

If you are interested in contributing, check out the two-part workshop:

GNSO REGISTRATION DIRECTORY SERVICES (RDS) POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS WORKING GROUP MEETING
Saturday, 11 March 2017 - 13:45-16:45 in Hall C1.4 (GNSO)
Wednesday, 15 March 2017 - 13:45-15:00 in Hall C1.4 (GNSO)

Or contact the GNSO Secretariat at gnso-secs@icann.org.

Subsequent Procedures for New gTLDs

ICANN launched its New generic Top-Level Domain (New gTLD) Program in 2012, accepting 1,930 applications for new gTLDs and delegating the first new gTLDs on 22 March 2013. Since this time, the DNS root zone has grown from 22 gTLDs to over 1,000, including community, geographical and internationalized domain names.

While there have been over 1,000 new gTLDs successfully delegated to the Root Zone under this program, there are undoubtedly ways in which it could be improved for future application rounds for New gTLDs. Out of this reality, the GNSO spawned the PDP on New Generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) Subsequent Procedures in December 2015 and

the working group (WG) was officially chartered in January 2016. Its purpose is to review and analyze existing policy recommendations outlined in the 2007 Final Report on the Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains to determine if any changes need to be made. The WG established the following three drafting teams to focus on delivering proposals relating to the overarching issues:

• Predictability/Community Engagement
• Applications Assessed in Rounds
• Different TLD Types

They also established four working tracks to cover the remaining issues in the charter:

• Work Track 1: Overall Process/Support/Outreach Issues
• Work Track 2: Legal / Regulatory Issues
• Work Track 3: String Contention/Objections & Disputes
• Work Track 4: Internationalized Domain Names/Technical & Operations

These relatively broad subjects are packed with issues of importance for future New gTLD rounds and the future evolution of and innovation in the DNS.

If you are interested in getting involved with this process, check out the following workshops:

GNSO NEW GTLD SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURES POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS WORKING GROUP MEETING
Saturday, 11 March 2017
8:30am-11:45am in Hall B4.2 (GNSO)

GNSO NEW GTLD SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURES PDP WORKING GROUP COMMUNITY DIALOGUE
Wednesday, 15 March 2017
17:00-18:30 in Hall C1.4 (GNSO)

Contact the GNSO Secretariat at gnso-secs@icann.org.

Gender Equity

With this ICANNWiki Quick Guide marked the beginning of our research on Gender Issues in Tech & Internet Governance. Visit that page for ICANNWiki Infographics on the subject, as well as a collection of organizations and actions undertaken around the world to help solve the persistent problem of gender inequality in tech and governance.

This issue highlights the gender capacity-building organizations, WomensNet, Reprograma, Feminist Approach to Technology, and TechChix Tanzania.

Global Issues

Global

Diplo Foundation's IGCBP
Diplo’s Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme (IGCBP) engages stakeholders from small and developing countries to participate in Internet policy processes through a multidisciplinary program, that goes beyond training and research, by partnering with international organizations, academics and governments. Participants begin with an online Introduction to Internet governance course, followed by more in-depth courses on important subjects, such as cybersecurity, E-participation and more. Then the course transitions to a research phase, followed by policy immersion and finally community practice.

Diplo is also the home of the Geneva Internet Platform, which provides monthly briefings on Internet governance and seeks to be a “neutral and inclusive space for digital policy debates.” They utilize their physical presence in Geneva and their online presence, such as the Digital Watch to empower global stakeholders, but especially those from small and developing countries.

Asia

Asia Pacific Internet Governance Academy
In August 2016, ICANN and KISA (Korean & Internet Security Agency) co-hosted a five-day conference in Seoul, South Korea at Yonsei University. The conference focused on Internet governance for undergraduate and graduate students and strove to convey the history and development of Internet governance, as well as how to shape and get involved in these spaces now. Topics included the technical fundamentals of the Internet, the role of the Asia Pacific region in the Internet governance ecosystem, and an introduction to multistakeholderism.

NetMission.Asia
This NetMission Ambassadors Program, supported by DotAsia Organisation, recruits a group of students from tertiary institutes and universities in Hong Kong every year. The program aims to empower young minds through training, exchange opportunities, international conferences and community projects, to contribute to the local, regional and global Internet governance discourse. Ambassadors actively par-ticipate in various international Internet conferences such as ICANN meetings, Internet Governance Forum (IGF), Asia Pacific regional Internet Governance Forum (APrIGF) and Asia Pacific Next Generation Camp (APNG Camp).

Apricot Fellowships
APRICOT Fellowships are awarded to anyone who is actively involved in Internet development, whether that be through network design or engineering, or operations. Applicants must also reside in the Asia-Pacific area, especially LDC or Small Island Developing State, and women are strongly encouraged to apply. Reimbursement for airfare (to a point), lodging and registration fees are covered. The program “give(s) opportunities to Internet network engineers and operators from the less privileged parts of the Asia Pacific region to come to the region’s premier Internet Operations and Technology event.”

North America

ICANNWiki
ICANNWiki is a nonprofit dedicated to bringing internet governance content to everyone. The website functions much like Wikipedia in that it strives to be neutral and fact-based, but with a focus on ICANN and governance. Since 2015, the organization has partnered with a number of stakeholder groups in Kenya, Tanzania, Argentina, China, Hong Kong, Colombia, and Brazil to hold hands-on workshops to inform, collaborate and develop localized content in languages such as Portuguese, Spanish, Chinese, and Swahili.

Middle East

iGMena
Determined to untangle the common perception that governance simply equates more government control, iGMena was developed to demystify IG, encourage learning and participation and hone better legislation. Since its inception in 2012, iGmena has been on the forefront of developing and reinforcing knowledge as well as building capacity on Internet governance in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

The iGMena Summit was held in Tunis, Tunisia, September 30 - October 2, 2016, and took stock of the work the community has done so far, reflect on iGmena’s achievements, and learn from their experience with the program to create a more effective and sustainable program. The summit focused on surveillance, safety in journalism, net neutrality, ISP policy, and data protection. 75 activists, technologists and policymakers came together for the event.

Learn more about the MEAC region.

MEAC-SIG
MEAC-SIG seeks to offer a framework and a space for action for burgeoning professionals, academics and activists within the Internet governance spaces.

The MEAC-SIG will help individuals from the Middle East and Adjoining Countries to better understand the global, regional, and national Internet Governance issues, settings and processes while gaining access to comprehensive and structured knowledge on the various aspects of Internet Governance, and the actors, issues and settings surrounding it.

The five-day event covers Internet governance’s many pluralities, including the socio-cultural, political and technological implications. These topics and more are given real-world context through roleplay and interactive sessions. The last MEAC-SIG took place August 2016 in Beirut, Lebanon.

Africa

Tech Needs Girls Tech Needs Girls is a mentorship program based in Ghana, Africa. The organization currently has 2,065 girls enrolled and partnered with 15 mentors in order to learn code and take part in contributing to developing technologies.The program routinely holds hands-on coding, social media and software development courses for young women, in order to improve college graduation rates and to disrupt the young bride tradition often found in the lives of Ghanan girls.

African Internet Governance Forum The AfIGF, held once a year, is a space for dialogue between over 200 stakeholders from 30 countries regarding the wellbeing and growth of the Internet in Africa. AfIGF met in October, 2016 in Durban, South Africa with a few key objectives in mind: to increase inclusiveness with regard to African digital transformation, and building a gender balanced multistakeholder model. Pre-conference sessions focused on the role of African civil society on Internet governance, as well as the influence of youth.

Europe

Southeastern European Dialogue on Internet Governance (SEEDIG)
Outside of planning for an annual meeting, stakeholders participate in intersessional activities that promote a cohesive inclusion. After meeting, session takeaways and deliberations are disseminated throughout regional governmental agencies, parliaments, companies and organizations.

SEEDIG 2016 meets “not [to] make decisions, but...influence those who do.”

The third annual meeting will take place May 24-25 in Ohrid, in the former Republic of Yugoslavia, Macedonia.

EUROSSIG
From the organization’s website: “The European Summer School on Internet Governance (EuroSSIG) helps interested students and academics as well as individuals working in the private sector or in government, to understand better the global Internet Governance controversy and to get a comprehensive and structured knowledge on the various aspects of Internet Governance. A one week academic course, taking place annually end of July, covers the political, legal, economic, socio-cultural, technological and other dimensions of the governance of the Internet. The course includes also practical oriented lectures covering the management of critical Internet resources as well as the development of the domain name market.”

EuroSSIG is an annual summer school on Internet Governance, now in its 11th year. This year’s event will take place in Meissen, Germany, July 16 - 22.

Latin America

The Youth Observatory
In an effort to improve youth engagement in Internet Governance, participants of the Youth@IGF 2015 formed the Youth Observatory. 80 members, including a full board created a charter letter in order to work together to create an environment of growth and learning. The organization’s website hosts a series of newsletters full of opportunities for developing professionals. While the organization is largely comprised of Latin American youth, anyone who is considered a youth and has interest in governance is welcome to join.

South School on Internet Governance (SSIG)
The South School on Internet Governance (SSIG) holds an annual program to train stakeholders in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region on issues relating to Internet governance (IG). The school is held in different locations each year, to provide diverse perspectives and participation. It features experts from different stakeholder groups on panels that educate the fellows about the most pressing issues facing IG. The conference organizers host a number of Fellows and strive to cover most expenses through sponsorship, so that attendance is possible for anyone interested in IG.

This year’s conference will be held in Rio de Janeiro from 3-7 April 2017, in the Auditorium of the Getulio Vargas Foundation, and will feature simultaneously translations in English, Spanish and Portuguese, all of which will also be available for remote participation.

Generic Names Supporting Organization. Develops and recommends to the Board substantive policies relating to generic top-level domains and other responsibilities set forth in the Bylaws (ICANN Bylaws).

At-Large Advisory Committee. Considers and provides advice on the activities of ICANN related to the interests of individual Internet users (ICANN Bylaws). Not to be confused with the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group.

Country Code Names Supporting Organization. Develops and recommends to the Board global policies relating to country-code top-level domains (ICANN Bylaws).

Address Supporting Organization. Advises the Board with respect to policy issues relating to the operation, assignment, and management of Internet addresses (ICANN Bylaws).

Security and Stability Advisory Committee. Advises the ICANN community and Board on matters relating to the security and integrity of the Internet's naming and address allocation systems (ICANN Bylaws).

Governmental Advisory Committee. Considers and provides advice on the activities of ICANN as they relate to concerns of governments, particularly matters where there may be an interaction between ICANN's policies and various laws and international agreements or where they may affect public policy issues (ICANN Bylaws).

Policy Development Process

Top-Level Domain

Internet Governance Forum

Internet Service Provider