Brights Consulting: Difference between revisions
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
==Partnership== | ==Partnership== | ||
In 2010, Brights Consulting partnered with [[AusRegistry]] back-end domain registry solutions for companies interested in owning and operating their [[Brand gTLD]]. The partnership was developed in response with [[ICANN]]'s latest gTLD expansion program.<ref>[http://www.ariservices.com/pdf/ARI_Brights_press_release.pdf AusRegistry International partners with Japanese corporate Registrar, Brights Consulting]</ref> | In 2010, Brights Consulting partnered with [[AusRegistry]] back-end domain registry solutions for companies interested in owning and operating their [[Brand gTLD]]. The partnership was developed in response with [[ICANN]]'s latest gTLD expansion program.<ref>[http://www.ariservices.com/pdf/ARI_Brights_press_release.pdf AusRegistry International partners with Japanese corporate Registrar, Brights Consulting]</ref> | ||
==ICANN Involvement== | |||
Brights Consulting participates in the different activities and meetings of ICANN. The company is represented by Cecilia Fernandez during the [[ICANN 34]] International Public Meeting in Mexico <ref>[http://forms.icann.org/cgi/attendees.cgi Pre-Registered Attendees]</ref> while Yoshitaka Murakami and Ryuji Kozu attended [[ICANN 38]] in Paris.<ref>[http://par.icann.org/attendees/ ICANN Participation Paris 2008]</ref> | |||
On May 14, 2011, the company provided comments on the Applicant Guidebook particularly on Question 22 on the current DAG which requires applicants to show how they will be able to incorporate the GAC principles for the protection of geographical [[TLD]]s in the second and other levels of TLD. Brights Consulting acknowledge the importance of protecting geo TLDs but they also asked ICANN to understand the situation of possible .brand applicants affected by the requirement. The company suggested to develop a universal solution that will allow .brand applicants to release the reserved geographic names including the two-label country codes for their exclusive internal use all at once.<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/6gtld-guide/msg00022.html Comments on Applicant Guidebook Discussion Draft, April 2011]</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 22:08, 1 February 2012
 | |
| Type: | Privately held |
| Industry: | Internet |
| Founded: | 2004 |
| Headquarters: | Tokyo |
| Country: | Japan |
| Website: | brightsconsulting.com |
| Key People | |
| Ryuji Kozu, CEO | |
Brights Consulting is an ICANN accredited registrar since 2008. The comapany specializes in global trademark and domain name registration. Brights Consulting is an accredited registrar for .eu and .jp country code top level domain names (ccTLDs). Ryuji Kozu serves as Chief Executive Officer of the company and its headquarters is based in Tokyo, Japan.[1]
Services[edit | edit source]
The company provides services under the Brantect which include:[2]
- Trademark Management
- Domain Management
- Search Engine Management
- Auction Site Management Service
- Anti-Phishing Service
- Website Monitoring Service
Partnership[edit | edit source]
In 2010, Brights Consulting partnered with AusRegistry back-end domain registry solutions for companies interested in owning and operating their Brand gTLD. The partnership was developed in response with ICANN's latest gTLD expansion program.[3]
ICANN Involvement[edit | edit source]
Brights Consulting participates in the different activities and meetings of ICANN. The company is represented by Cecilia Fernandez during the ICANN 34 International Public Meeting in Mexico [4] while Yoshitaka Murakami and Ryuji Kozu attended ICANN 38 in Paris.[5]
On May 14, 2011, the company provided comments on the Applicant Guidebook particularly on Question 22 on the current DAG which requires applicants to show how they will be able to incorporate the GAC principles for the protection of geographical TLDs in the second and other levels of TLD. Brights Consulting acknowledge the importance of protecting geo TLDs but they also asked ICANN to understand the situation of possible .brand applicants affected by the requirement. The company suggested to develop a universal solution that will allow .brand applicants to release the reserved geographic names including the two-label country codes for their exclusive internal use all at once.[6]
References[edit | edit source]