Difference between revisions of "Kurt Pritz"
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
He also attended a similar hearing conducted by the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee- Subcommittee on Communications and Technology on December 14.<ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20111214_icann_asked_to_delay_new_gtld_expansion_house_of_representatives/ ICANN Asked to Delay New gTLD Expansion Program at the House of Representatives Committee Hearing]</ref> | He also attended a similar hearing conducted by the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee- Subcommittee on Communications and Technology on December 14.<ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20111214_icann_asked_to_delay_new_gtld_expansion_house_of_representatives/ ICANN Asked to Delay New gTLD Expansion Program at the House of Representatives Committee Hearing]</ref> | ||
− | During the Senate hearing, Kurt provided the members of the Senate committee on Commerce Science and Transportation a detailed testimony regarding the program. He highlighted the fact that | + | During the Senate hearing, Kurt provided the members of the Senate committee on Commerce Science and Transportation a detailed testimony regarding the program. He highlighted the fact that '''it took seven years for the internet community to develop the program through a careful, transparent and inclusive discussions and debates.''' He emphasized that ICANN received "2400 public comments from 47 extended comment periods that resulted in over 1400 pages of comment summary and analysis, formation of ten independent expert working groups, and 59 explanatory memoranda and independent reports." He also pointed out that world-class experts on intellectual property, economics and Internet security were involved in the development process to ensure a more enhanced protection and solutions for trademark holders, which were reviewed and examined by the internet community and governments. He also pointed out the members of the Senate that ICANN is committed to work closely with law enforcement agencies to protect consumers. He repeated Sec. [[Lawrence Strickling|Larry Stricking]]'s statement regarding the [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder process]] in developing the new gTLD program that,'''"The multistakeholder process does not guarantee that everyone will be satisfied with the outcome. But it is critical to preserving the model of Internet governance that has been so successful to date that all parties respect and work through the process and accept the outcome once a decision is reached."'''<ref>[http://blog.icann.org/2011/12/carefully-constructed-new-gtld-program-moves-forward/ Carefully Constructed New gTLD Program Moves Forward]</ref> |
During the hearing in the hearing in the House of Representatives, Kurt repeated to the members of the Sub-committee on Communications and Technology the seven-years hard work of the internet community in developing the program. He emphasized that the expansion of new TLDs is a measured rolled out with much better trademark protection mechanisms, it will create more jobs and promotes competition and innovation. In his testimony, he sent a message to the Congress and to the critics of the program that the internet governing body has no intention of delaying its implementation which was scheduled on January 12, 2012.<ref>[http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Telecom/121411/Pritz.pdf TESTIMONY OF KURT PRITZ, SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, HEARING ON ICANN’s TOP LEVEL DOMAIN NAME PROGRAM]</ref> | During the hearing in the hearing in the House of Representatives, Kurt repeated to the members of the Sub-committee on Communications and Technology the seven-years hard work of the internet community in developing the program. He emphasized that the expansion of new TLDs is a measured rolled out with much better trademark protection mechanisms, it will create more jobs and promotes competition and innovation. In his testimony, he sent a message to the Congress and to the critics of the program that the internet governing body has no intention of delaying its implementation which was scheduled on January 12, 2012.<ref>[http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Telecom/121411/Pritz.pdf TESTIMONY OF KURT PRITZ, SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, HEARING ON ICANN’s TOP LEVEL DOMAIN NAME PROGRAM]</ref> |
Revision as of 03:01, 29 April 2012
Country: | USA |
Email: | kurt.pritz [at] icann.org |
Website: | |
LinkedIn: | [kurt-pritz Kurt Pritz] |
Template:SENUBX |
Kurt Pritz is a practicing attorney and the Senior Vice President of Stakeholder Relations at ICANN, where he oversees the growth of ICANN's Multistakeholder Model, as well as ICANN's key stakeholder relationships. He is also overseeing the implementation of the New gTLD Program.[1] His high-profile work includes representing ICANN at judicial and legal hearings in Washington, D.C..[2]
Prior to joining ICANN, Pritz was the Vice President of Production at Walt Disney Imagineering, where he directed the manufacturing and engineering of theme park shows worldwide. He has also worked as a plant manager for the Eaton Corporation.[3]
He holds a B.S. and M.S. in Physics, an M.B.A. and a J.D.[4]
Role within ICANN[edit | edit source]
Kurt was appointed as a Vice President of ICANN in September 2003. He was promoted as Senior Vice President for Stakeholder Relations on December 2006.[5] As VP for Stakeholder Relations, Kurt serves as spokesperson of the internet body on different issues particularly the ICANN new gTLD program. He led the coordination of multiple public consultations regarding the program until it was approved and implemented by the ICANN Board. Kurt continues to provide information, presentations, answers questions and discusses issues related to the new gTLD program as they arise.
In March 2012, during the GNSO Council meeting at ICANN 43 in Costa Rica, Kurt informed the community that the ICANN Board plans to implement the "Target Time Variance" (secondary time stamp) system in determining how each new gTLD application will be grouped into batches. According to him an applicant will pick his or her "target time" to process the application at the TLD Application System (TAS) then click the submit button. The application batches will be divided based on the fastest applicant down to the slowest from each of five ICANN geographic regions in a round robin method. He also said the applicants will have the opportunity to try out the system to determine and adjust their response time. He also explained that random selection is not feasible because of legal issues.[6] The target time variance, which was described by Kurt which will be used in the batching process was officially approved and named by the ICANN Board as "digital archery" on March 28, 2012.[7]
Prior to the opening of the applications for the new gTLD program on January 12, 2012, Kurt announced that ICANN might release a new separate guidebook for the newly developed Applicant Support program to supplement Applicant Guidebook. He explained that a number of questions and requests for clarifications on some points in the guidebook were received and responded by ICANN's customer service center. He said, "We will summarize those clarifications in one document – that might be an Advisory or in the form of an updated Guidebook. In either case, the positions of applicants will not be affected as the information will repeat that in previously answered questions."[8]
Videos Related to New gTLD[edit | edit source]
<videoflash>5WicJI0jzK4</videoflash>
<videoflash>H56DV_2xhaE</videoflash>
<videoflash>ZNF7gyDYnjM</videoflash>
<videoflash>Zlmz8IoesQE</videoflash>
Congressional Hearings on New gTLD[edit | edit source]
On December 8, 2011, Kurt Pritz served as one of the witnesses during Senate Hearing on ICANN's new gTLD Program. He strongly defended the program against its critics including the Association of National Advertisers, and its anti-TLD off-shoot, CRIDO. [9] He also attended a similar hearing conducted by the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee- Subcommittee on Communications and Technology on December 14.[10]
During the Senate hearing, Kurt provided the members of the Senate committee on Commerce Science and Transportation a detailed testimony regarding the program. He highlighted the fact that it took seven years for the internet community to develop the program through a careful, transparent and inclusive discussions and debates. He emphasized that ICANN received "2400 public comments from 47 extended comment periods that resulted in over 1400 pages of comment summary and analysis, formation of ten independent expert working groups, and 59 explanatory memoranda and independent reports." He also pointed out that world-class experts on intellectual property, economics and Internet security were involved in the development process to ensure a more enhanced protection and solutions for trademark holders, which were reviewed and examined by the internet community and governments. He also pointed out the members of the Senate that ICANN is committed to work closely with law enforcement agencies to protect consumers. He repeated Sec. Larry Stricking's statement regarding the multistakeholder process in developing the new gTLD program that,"The multistakeholder process does not guarantee that everyone will be satisfied with the outcome. But it is critical to preserving the model of Internet governance that has been so successful to date that all parties respect and work through the process and accept the outcome once a decision is reached."[11]
During the hearing in the hearing in the House of Representatives, Kurt repeated to the members of the Sub-committee on Communications and Technology the seven-years hard work of the internet community in developing the program. He emphasized that the expansion of new TLDs is a measured rolled out with much better trademark protection mechanisms, it will create more jobs and promotes competition and innovation. In his testimony, he sent a message to the Congress and to the critics of the program that the internet governing body has no intention of delaying its implementation which was scheduled on January 12, 2012.[12]
Statement Regarding HostExploit's Accusation Against eNom[edit | edit source]
In 2010, HostExploit, an anti-malware research group accused eNom, an ICANN accredited registrar for hosting an unusually large number of malicious websites and the preferred registrar for pharmaceutical spammers. The group also accused the company's domain name resellers of violating ICANN rules by allowing registrants to provide inaccurate information in the Whois data base. In response to the issue, Kurt informed the research group that ICANN will investigate the issue. eNom will be asked to provide its response to the accusations and appropriate actions will be done.[13] [14]
RegisterFly Issue[edit | edit source]
RegisterFly was a very problematic registrar and its accreditation was terminated by ICANN in 2009. The company started its business as a reseller for eNom. In 2004, RegisterFly purchased Top Class Names, Inc., an ICANN accredited registrar. After the acquisition, the new owners of the company's assumed the accreditation and role as a registrar and its name was change to RegisterFly. In 2005, ICANN started receiving complaints from consumers due to poor service. The number of complaints escalated from being unresponsive and 30 minutes call hold time to overcharging of credit cards, domain names being deleted and stolen from registrants. In 2007, Kurt issued a Notice of Breach and to the company for violating several provisions of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). He instructed the RegisterFly to correct all its violations and resolve all customer complaints. He also warned the company that ICANN will terminate its accreditation agreement if it will not comply with the RAA. [15] He also sent a Notice of Audit to the company that ICANN will inspect and get a complete copy of the data of all the domain names under its sponsorship. Due to the company's non-compliance, Kurt requested its counsel to send a second Notice of Breach and eventually ICANN filed a lawsuit against the company. On March 28, 2007, Kurt submiited a detailed declaration to the court about RegisterFly's violations of the RAA, which affected thousand of customers.[16] ICANN terminated the company accreditation immediately after a court order. [17]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ ICANN.org
- ↑ the 10 Dumbest Moments for that New TLDs Congressional HEaring, DomainIncite.com
- ↑ domainfest.com
- ↑ icann.org
- ↑ domainsget.info
- ↑ Here’s how new gTLD batching will work
- ↑ Batching of New gTLD Applications: Secondary Timestamp
- ↑ ICANN confirms possible new Applicant Guidebook
- ↑ Icann attacks opponents of new gTLDs at Senate hearing
- ↑ ICANN Asked to Delay New gTLD Expansion Program at the House of Representatives Committee Hearing
- ↑ Carefully Constructed New gTLD Program Moves Forward
- ↑ TESTIMONY OF KURT PRITZ, SUBCOMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY, HEARING ON ICANN’s TOP LEVEL DOMAIN NAME PROGRAM
- ↑ eNom accused of being number one for malware sites
- ↑ ICANN asks Demand Media for answers after report
- ↑ Notice of Breach of ICANN Registrar Accreditation Agreement
- ↑ Declaration of Kurt Pritz in Support of ICANN’s Application for TRO, 29 March 2007
- ↑ Court Decision Allows Imminent Termination of RegisterFly | ICANN granted the right to act on transfers as soon as possible; plan in action