Main Page: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<table cellspacing="0"><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;background-color:# | <table cellspacing="0"><tr><td style="vertical-align:top;background-color:#f5faff;border:1px solid #DDD;padding:7px 7px 7px 7px;" vertical-align="top"> | ||
<div style="margin:0;background:#cedff2;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #DDD;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;">New gTLDs to Watch: | <div style="margin:0;background:#cedff2;font-family:sans-serif;font-size:120%;font-weight:bold;border:1px solid #DDD;text-align:left;color:#000;padding-left:0.4em;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em;">New gTLDs to Watch: Contention & GAC Warnings</div> | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;margin-top:0.5em"></div> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;margin-top:0.5em"></div> | ||
# '''[[.swiss]]''' - Brand v. Government-backed Community Application. GAC Early Warning issued | |||
# '''[[.zulu]]''' - Applicant claims support of 'Zulu Government', South African GAC rep counters that there is no such thing | |||
# '''[[.hotel]]''' - Hotly contested with numerous GAC warnings | |||
# '''[[.website]]''' - Samoa claims it will endanger its economy | |||
# '''[[.rugby]]''' - The U.K. argues one applicant is a Community even though it did not apply as such | |||
# '''[[.navy]], [[.army]], [[.airforce]]''' - received 3 warnings each | |||
# '''[[.green]]''' - Czech Republic argues 3 of 4 applicants are in fact not "green" enough to run .green | |||
# '''[[.bible]]''' - one of several religious TLDs opposed by India, which claims its large and potentially volatile religious communities are not addressed or helped by the applications | |||
# '''[[.sucks]]''' - one of several TLDs opposed as being "too negative", and therefore requiring unnecessary defensive registrations | |||
# '''[[.patagonia]]''' - South American nations continue to rally against the potential Brand TLD | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td rowspan="3" style="width:8px;"></td> | <td rowspan="3" style="width:8px;"></td> |
Revision as of 23:02, 30 December 2012
New gTLDs to Watch: Contention & GAC Warnings
|
||
|
Resources
|