Jump to content

Contracted Party House: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
No edit summary
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
====[[NomCom|Nominating Committee]] Appointee====
====[[NomCom|Nominating Committee]] Appointee====
* [[Thomas Rickert]], (Germany)
* [[Thomas Rickert]], (Germany)
== Criticism of the CPH ==
In April, 2011, [[Avri Doria]], in a post on [[CircleID]], criticized the CPH for its lack of transparency and accountability, as called for by the [[ICANN Bylaws]] and its [[Multistakeholder Model]]. Registries argue that their contract is between themselves and ICANN, which should not include a medley of public opinion and comment. Their concern is that this external commentary affects their direct bargain and that it limits their say in their regulation, which will affect the Commercial as well as Non-Commercial users of the DNS in particular, and the ICANN community in general.<ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/registrar_stakeholder_group_gnso_works_against_icann_multistakeholder circleid.com]</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 08:08, 13 March 2017

The Contracted Parties House (CPH) is one of the two major structures making up the GNSO, with the other being the Non-Contracted Parties House. The CPH consists of the Registry Stakeholder Group and the Registrar Stakeholder Group.[1]

GNSO Council[edit | edit source]

Six representatives from the Contracted Parties House are appointed to the GNSO Council, plus one Voting NCA. Three representatives are drawn from the Registry Stakeholder Group, and three from the Registrar Stakeholder Group.

Registry Stakeholder Group[edit | edit source]

Registrar Stakeholder Group[edit | edit source]

Nominating Committee Appointee[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]