ICANN 67: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
recommendations, 17 specific community questions, and 24 proposals. The working group deliberated RPM-related recommendations of the Temporary | recommendations, 17 specific community questions, and 24 proposals. The working group deliberated RPM-related recommendations of the Temporary | ||
Specification team and the Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team. | Specification team and the Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team. | ||
===ALAC=== | |||
The At-Large Community held two policy workshops on [[DNS Abuse]] and a cross-community roundtable on [[Cybersecurity]] and geopolitics in a [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder environment]]. The At-Large community held a policy workshop on DNS-over-TLS (DoT) and DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH). | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
[[Category:ICANN Meetings]] | [[Category:ICANN Meetings]] |
Revision as of 15:49, 4 October 2021
Dates: | March 7-12, 2020 |
Location: | Virtual |
Website: | ICANN 67 (registration required) |
ICANN 67 was held as a virtual community forum in March 2020. It was the first meeting to be fully virtual as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The original host was Cancun, and the time zone for meeting scheduling was Eastern Standard Time.
Sessions[edit | edit source]
GNSO[edit | edit source]
The GNSO held 19 sessions including GNSO policy development process (PDP) working group meetings, Stakeholder Group and Constituency work meetings, and a GNSO Council meeting.
- The EPDP Team finalized its draft recommendations on Priority 2 topics:
- the display of information of affiliated vs. accredited privacy/proxy providers,
- data retention,
- city field redaction, and
- feasibility of unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address. The EPDP Team included these recommendations in its Addendum
on Priority 2 items for Public Comment.[1]
- The New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Working Group held three sessions on
- whether to allow closed generic top-level domains;
- Global Public Interest topics such as Mandatory Public Interest Commitments (PICs), Voluntary Public Interest Commitments, tentatively called Registry Voluntary Commitments (RVCs), DNS Abuse, and Verified TLDs; and
- Draft recommendations on GAC Advice and GAC Early Warning.
- The Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs PDP working group reviewed the draft Phase 1 Initial Report, with 26 preliminary
recommendations, 17 specific community questions, and 24 proposals. The working group deliberated RPM-related recommendations of the Temporary Specification team and the Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team.
ALAC[edit | edit source]
The At-Large Community held two policy workshops on DNS Abuse and a cross-community roundtable on Cybersecurity and geopolitics in a multistakeholder environment. The At-Large community held a policy workshop on DNS-over-TLS (DoT) and DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH).