Changes

Line 18: Line 18:     
By April of 2009, WCL published its final report on the Independent Review on RSSAC with the following findings:
 
By April of 2009, WCL published its final report on the Independent Review on RSSAC with the following findings:
*
+
* RSSAC only provide reactions to issues instead of regularly giving updates to the ICANN Board regarding the activities and functions of the committee.
 +
* Communication and agreement about the expectations of the Board towards the committee is insufficient.
 +
* RSAAC provides minimal strategic advice to the ICANN Board because the committee is dominated by independent root server operators that are focused on operations.
 +
* The records of the RSSAC meetings are poor and incomplete.
 +
* The election process of the members of the committee and its chairman is not clear.
 +
* The Root Server Operators believed that some of the functions of RSSAC identified in the Bylaws of ICANN is their responsibility and because of that the committee's reported little of its responsibilities.
 +
* Interaction between RSSAC and the different organization within ICANN is limited because most of the committee's members do not or seldom participate in [[ICANN Meetings]]. RSSAC committee members frequently attend or conduct their meeting in conjunction with the meetings of the [[IETF]].
    
==RSSAC Working Group==
 
==RSSAC Working Group==
9,082

edits