Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
The ICANN Board made recommendations on how to improve the operations and structure of the GNSO. One of its recommendations | The [[ICANN Board]] made recommendations on how to improve the operations and structure of the GNSO. One of its recommendations was the development of new GNSO constituencies in accordance with Article X, Section 5(4) of the [[ICANN Bylaws]]. As there were no specific guidelines stipulated in the ICANN Bylaws on how the community could file a petition for a new constituency, the ICANN Staff helped the ICANN community in formulating procedures in accordance with principles within the Bylaws, as directed by the ICANN Board. On October 2008, two procedures were formulated and adopted by the Internet community: the submission of a Notice of Intent (NOIF) to Form a New GNSO Constituency and a formal Petition/Charter. NPOC submitted its NOIF on June 15, 2010, followed by its Petition/Charter on November 2, 2010, which was subsequently revised on December 7, 2010.<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/npoc-petition-charter/msg00017.html Staff Summary and Analysis of Comments - NPOC]</ref> | ||
A public comment regarding NPOC's intention to become part of the new GNSO Constituency was conducted by | |||
A public comment regarding NPOC's intention to become part of the new GNSO Constituency was conducted by ICANN staff from December 1, 2010 until January 30, 2011.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-01dec10-en.htm Public Comment: Community Comment Invited on Petition To Form A New GNSO Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency]</ref> The Charter of NPOC was approved by ICANN on June 24, 2011, and this NPOC became an official GNSO constituency.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Not-for-Profit+Operational+Concerns+%28NPOC%29 Approval Motion - 24 June 2011]</ref> | |||
==Structure== | ==Structure== | ||
NPOC is composed of Executive, Membership, Policy and Communications Committees. The constituency will also elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman, Secretariat and Committee Chairs. The officers and members of each committee shall be elected by the constituency | NPOC is composed of Executive, Membership, Policy and Communications Committees. The constituency will also elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman, Secretariat and Committee Chairs. The officers and members of each committee shall be elected by the constituency members. Each term will last a year and any elected officer cannot serve more than more than five years within a ten years period. The rules and responsibilities of the elected officers are defined in the NPOC Charter.<ref>[http://www.npoc.org/images/NPOC_Charter_Approved_06-24-2011.pdf NPOC Petition and Charter]</ref> | ||
==Members== | ==Members== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
==Comments on ICANN Issues== | ==Comments on ICANN Issues== | ||
Since its establishment, NPOC had been active in sharing comments and recommendations on different ICANN issues particularly regarding the new gTLD program set to start on January 12, 2012. The organization submitted its comments during the drafting of the Applicant Guidebook | Since its establishment, NPOC had been active in sharing comments and recommendations on different ICANN issues, particularly regarding the new gTLD program, which is set to start on January 12, 2012. The organization submitted its comments during the drafting of the Applicant Guidebook; most recently, comments were submitted on May 15, 2011 by Amber Sterling, Chairman of the constituency. NPOC's comments include the following: | ||
* ICANN Board should provide price options for non-profit organizations for new gTLD applications based on criteria. | * The ICANN Board should provide price options for non-profit organizations for new gTLD applications based on criteria. | ||
* | * It was suggested that the ICANN Board implement an initial evaluation period to weigh the costs and benefits of proposed new gTLDs to the public. | ||
* NPOC praised the ICANN Board's initiative in adding questions related to | * NPOC praised the ICANN Board's initiative in adding questions to the new gTLD application related to an applicant's intent. In connection to this, NPOC suggested to grade the answers to those questions as part of the review of applications. | ||
* NPOC suggested to further define the role of Independent Objector (IO) in connection with IO selection, IO support, IO application review | * NPOC suggested to further define the role of Independent Objector (IO) in connection with IO selection, IO support, IO application review and IP decision, if it is necessary to object or not. | ||
and IP decision if it is necessary to object or not. | * It was recommended that marks not protected by court or statute should be submitted to the Trademark Clearinghouse periodically (every 3 years) and must be a requirement during the [[Sunrise Period]]. In addition, the expansion of trademark claims and Sunrise Period services was also recommended by the constituency as well as the reduction of Clearinghouse filing fees for non-profit organizations. | ||
* | * It was also recommended that the Uniform Rapid Suspension ([[URS]]) for non-profit organization and to reduce the requirements for the limited loser pays to complaints for 8 or more domain names in dispute from the current 26 domain names in dispute.<ref>[http://www.npoc.org/images/NPOC_ApplicantGuidebook_Comments_05-15-11.pdf Applicant Guidebook Comments, May 15, 2011]</ref> | ||
* | |||
NPOC's compilation of comments on the different [[DNS]] Policy Issues of ICANN can be found [http://www.npoc.org/icannsubmittedcomments.html here] | NPOC's compilation of comments on the different [[DNS]] Policy Issues of ICANN can be found [http://www.npoc.org/icannsubmittedcomments.html here]. | ||
==Senate Hearing Testimony Regarding New gTLD Expansion== | ==Senate Hearing Testimony Regarding New gTLD Expansion== | ||
On December 8, 2011, [[Angela Williams]], General Counsel of YMCA of the USA testified during hearing conducted by the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation regarding the ICANN's new gTLD | On December 8, 2011, [[Angela Williams]], General Counsel of YMCA of the USA, testified during a hearing conducted by the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation regarding the ICANN's new gTLD program. Williams represented NPOC and testified that new gTLD program compromises use of the Internet by increasing the risk of fraud, cybersquatting, and trademark infringement and by significantly escalating the cost to protect against such unlawful activities. She requested the Senate committee and all parties involved to further evaluate the program with the non-profit organizations in mind.<ref>[http://commerce.senate.gov/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=56a49ede-865f-4bbe-9635-58d0b59add7b Testimony of Angela F. Williams]</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:ICANN Bodies]] | [[Category:ICANN Bodies]] | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
Revision as of 17:18, 20 December 2011
The Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC) is a new constituency within the Generic Names Supporting Organization's Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG). NPOC represents the interests of domain name registrants who belong to non-profit and non-government organizations. NPOC participates in ICANN community discussions on policy issues related to the Internet and Domain Name System (DNS), as such issues have a significant impact on the operations of these organizations and their delivery of services that are beneficial to various communities. NPOC was approved by the ICANN Board on June 24, 2011,[1] and Amber Sterling serves as Interim Chairman.
Background[edit | edit source]
The ICANN Board made recommendations on how to improve the operations and structure of the GNSO. One of its recommendations was the development of new GNSO constituencies in accordance with Article X, Section 5(4) of the ICANN Bylaws. As there were no specific guidelines stipulated in the ICANN Bylaws on how the community could file a petition for a new constituency, the ICANN Staff helped the ICANN community in formulating procedures in accordance with principles within the Bylaws, as directed by the ICANN Board. On October 2008, two procedures were formulated and adopted by the Internet community: the submission of a Notice of Intent (NOIF) to Form a New GNSO Constituency and a formal Petition/Charter. NPOC submitted its NOIF on June 15, 2010, followed by its Petition/Charter on November 2, 2010, which was subsequently revised on December 7, 2010.[2]
A public comment regarding NPOC's intention to become part of the new GNSO Constituency was conducted by ICANN staff from December 1, 2010 until January 30, 2011.[3] The Charter of NPOC was approved by ICANN on June 24, 2011, and this NPOC became an official GNSO constituency.[4]
Structure[edit | edit source]
NPOC is composed of Executive, Membership, Policy and Communications Committees. The constituency will also elect a Chairman, Vice Chairman, Secretariat and Committee Chairs. The officers and members of each committee shall be elected by the constituency members. Each term will last a year and any elected officer cannot serve more than more than five years within a ten years period. The rules and responsibilities of the elected officers are defined in the NPOC Charter.[5]
Members[edit | edit source]
The current members of NPOC include:[6]
- ALSAC / St. Jude Children's Research Hospital - United States
- American Council on Education (ACE) - United States
- American Red Cross (ARC) - United States
- Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) - United States
- Australian Red Cross Society - Australia
- Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio Communication (BNNRC) - Bangladesh
- Centre for Science and Media Studies - India
- Church of God in Christ, Inc. - United States
- Corporacion Makia Asesoria Internacional - Colombia
- Fundacion Chasquinet - Ecuador
- Fundacion Omar Dengo - Costa Rica
- Goodwill Industries International - United States
- Human Rights Campaign - United States
- IICD - The Netherlands
- International Baccalaureate Organization - Switzerland
- International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Socieites (IRC) - Switzerland
- March of Dimes - United States
- St. John Ambulance - United Kingdom
- The Association of NGOs (TANGO) - The Gambia
- Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) - United States
- World Wildlife Fund (WWF) - United States
- YMCA of The Gambia - The Gambia
- YMCA of the USA - United States
Comments on ICANN Issues[edit | edit source]
Since its establishment, NPOC had been active in sharing comments and recommendations on different ICANN issues, particularly regarding the new gTLD program, which is set to start on January 12, 2012. The organization submitted its comments during the drafting of the Applicant Guidebook; most recently, comments were submitted on May 15, 2011 by Amber Sterling, Chairman of the constituency. NPOC's comments include the following:
- The ICANN Board should provide price options for non-profit organizations for new gTLD applications based on criteria.
- It was suggested that the ICANN Board implement an initial evaluation period to weigh the costs and benefits of proposed new gTLDs to the public.
- NPOC praised the ICANN Board's initiative in adding questions to the new gTLD application related to an applicant's intent. In connection to this, NPOC suggested to grade the answers to those questions as part of the review of applications.
- NPOC suggested to further define the role of Independent Objector (IO) in connection with IO selection, IO support, IO application review and IP decision, if it is necessary to object or not.
- It was recommended that marks not protected by court or statute should be submitted to the Trademark Clearinghouse periodically (every 3 years) and must be a requirement during the Sunrise Period. In addition, the expansion of trademark claims and Sunrise Period services was also recommended by the constituency as well as the reduction of Clearinghouse filing fees for non-profit organizations.
- It was also recommended that the Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) for non-profit organization and to reduce the requirements for the limited loser pays to complaints for 8 or more domain names in dispute from the current 26 domain names in dispute.[7]
NPOC's compilation of comments on the different DNS Policy Issues of ICANN can be found here.
Senate Hearing Testimony Regarding New gTLD Expansion[edit | edit source]
On December 8, 2011, Angela Williams, General Counsel of YMCA of the USA, testified during a hearing conducted by the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation regarding the ICANN's new gTLD program. Williams represented NPOC and testified that new gTLD program compromises use of the Internet by increasing the risk of fraud, cybersquatting, and trademark infringement and by significantly escalating the cost to protect against such unlawful activities. She requested the Senate committee and all parties involved to further evaluate the program with the non-profit organizations in mind.[8]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ NPOC Wesite
- ↑ Staff Summary and Analysis of Comments - NPOC
- ↑ Public Comment: Community Comment Invited on Petition To Form A New GNSO Not-for-Profit Organizations Constituency
- ↑ Approval Motion - 24 June 2011
- ↑ NPOC Petition and Charter
- ↑ Members
- ↑ Applicant Guidebook Comments, May 15, 2011
- ↑ Testimony of Angela F. Williams