Jump to content

.jewelry: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Marie Cabural (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
# [[Donuts]] (Wild Bloom, LLC)
# [[Donuts]] (Wild Bloom, LLC)
# [[Richemont DNS Inc.]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Jewelry Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
# [[Richemont DNS Inc.]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Jewelry Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
===Richemont DNS Inc.===
The application was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>
The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exlcusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/Jewelry-AU-11362.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353429211000 jewelry AU, GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 15:56, 25 November 2012

Status: Proposed
country: International
Type: Generic
Category: Industry

More information:

.jewelry is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. Donuts (Wild Bloom, LLC)
  2. Richemont DNS Inc.[1]

Richemont DNS Inc.[edit | edit source]

The application was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[2]

The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exlcusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[3]

References[edit | edit source]