Jump to content

.mba: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Marie Cabural (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
# [[Your Dot Phd, Inc.]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus MBA Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
# [[Your Dot Phd, Inc.]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus MBA Status, ICANN.org]</ref>


===Donuts===
The application was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>
The warning states that the TLD refers to a regulated market but that the applicant has not provided for adequate measures to protect from consumer harm.<ref>[https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/22938690/MBA-AU-47497.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1353388727000 MBA AU, GACweb.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 16:23, 25 November 2012

Status: Proposed
country: International
Type: Generic
Category: Education

More information:

.mba is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. Donuts (Lone Hollow, LLC)
  2. Google (Charleston Road Registry Inc.)
  3. Your Dot Phd, Inc.[1]

Donuts[edit | edit source]

The application was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[2]

The warning states that the TLD refers to a regulated market but that the applicant has not provided for adequate measures to protect from consumer harm.[3]

References[edit | edit source]