Jump to content

Lawrence Strickling

From ICANNWiki


Country: USA
Website:

   [www.larrystrickling.com www.larrystrickling.com]

LinkedIn:    [Lawrence Strickling Lawrence Strickling]

Lawrence Strickling is a technology policy expert. He is the current Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information and Administrator of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) under the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC). He was sworn into office on June 25, 2009. As NTIA administrator, he is responsible in making sure that the agency's initiatives will result to the expansion of broadband internet access and the internet will continue as an effective vehicle for economic growth and innovation.[1]

Education[edit | edit source]

  • B.A. Economics- University of Maryland College Park (1969-1973)
  • J.D. Law- Harvard Law School (1973–1976)

Career History[edit | edit source]

Strickling started his career as a Litigation Partner in 1976 at Kirkland & Ellis LLP. , a law firm based in Chicago until 1987. He became Vice President for Public Policy of Ameritech, one of the Regional Bell Operating Companies for more tan four years from February 1993 to September 1997. After serving Ameritech, he went on to work for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as Chief of the Common Carrier Bureau from 1998 to 2000. He was responsible in promoting competition and consumer protection within the communications industry by implementing the rules set forth by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. He also served as Associate General Counsel and Chief of the Commissions Competition Division before serving as Chief of the Common Carrier Bureau. In 2000, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for CoreExpress for more than one year. He joined the Allegiance Telecom as Senior Vice president in 2002 and left the company after 2 years and 1 month. On Septemeber 2004, Strickling was hired by Broadwing Communications as Chief Regulatory Officer. He left the company in 2007 and joined the Obama for America in May 2007 as Policy Coordinator. On March 26, 2009, President Barack Obama announced Strickling’s nomination as Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information under the Department of Commerce. He assumed his position on June 25, 2009.[2] As Assistant Secretary of Communications and Information, Strickling supervised the Recovery Act Broadband Grants Program worth more than $4.7 billion.[3] He is currently managing the implementation and oversight of the program and ensures that the nationwide broadband project will be effective and installed on schedule and the Americans will benefit from it. He was also instructed by President Obama to supervise the NTIA's initiatives for domestic and global internt policy and administrative issues particularly the Internet Policy Task Force of the Department of Commerce. He also plays an important role as an advocate for the United States government's position abroad in connection with internet policies and to participate in the different activities of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) to promote the stability and security of the Domain Name System (DNS)[4]

Membership[edit | edit source]

  • Chairman of the Board of Visitors- Maryland School of Public Policy
  • Chairman of the Board of Trustees- University of Chicago Court Theatre
  • Chairman Board of Directors of Music of the Baroque in Chicago

ICANN Involvement[edit | edit source]

ATRT Member[edit | edit source]

As Assistant Secretary for Communication and Information of the Department of Commerce and NTIA Administrator, Strickling actively participates in the different activities and policy development issues of ICANN. He is an ex-officio member of ICANN's Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT).[5]

Remarks During the ICANN 40 Meeting[edit | edit source]

During his keynote speech at the ICANN 40 meeting in San Francisco on March 14, 2011, Strickling informed the ICANN Community that the United States government is "absolutely committed to the multi-stakeholder process as an essential strategy for dealing with Internet policy issues and to the ICANN model as the best way to preserve and protect the security and stability of the Internet." However the Assistant Secretary also stressed that, "we should never shy away from critically evaluating its performance and making improvements where appropriate." He also said that in his personal capacity, he spends a lot of time and effort in making sure that ICANN's reality measures up to its vision. In his speech, he also informed the ICANN community that the Internet Policy Task Force created by the DOC Secretary will work to:[6] [7]

  • Enhancing internet privacy
  • Ensuring cybersecurity
  • Protecting on-line copyright
  • Ensuring the global free flow of information

Strickling enumerated some of the achievements of ICANN such as the introduction of 27 Internationalized country code top level domain names (IDN ccTLDs), the implementation of review team process as stipulated in the Affirmation and the effort made the ICANN Board and the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) to work together and agree on the issue to increase the number of generic top level domain names (gTLDs). of but he also expressed some of his disappointments. Despite ICANN's accomplishments, he strongly emphasized that ICANN still needs to work to realize its vision. He expressed his disappointment with some of ICANN's decisions to remove the cross-ownership restriction. He stated that,"the Board still has not explained the basis of its decision to shift from no cross ownership to de minimus cross ownership to full cross ownership over the course of a single calendar year." He was also disappointed by the Boards decision to reverse its commitment to conduct further economic studies regarding the impact of new gTLDS. He emphasized that these decisions demonstrated that, "ICANN still has work to do to ensure that decisions made related to the global technical coordination of the DNS are in the public interest and are accountable and transparent." To help ICANN realize its vision, the Assistant Secretary made three recommendations:

  • Implement the Recommendations of the Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT)
  • Work harder to engage governments in the multi-stakeholder process by providing them a meaningful opportunity to participate and be heard inside of ICANN
  • Stop making decisions by yourself

ICANN Cartagena Board Meeting[edit | edit source]

During the ICANN meeting in Cartagena on December 7, 2010, Strickling pointed out the United States government’s commitment to the internet governing body’s multi-stakeholder model. He informed the ICANN Board that he spent 12 months analyzing the global expansion of the multi-stakeholder model to other aspects of internet policy and the Department of Commerce established the Internet Policy Task Force, which will concentrate on issues related to online privacy, copyright protection, cyber security and the free flow of information worldwide. He also pointed out that the Affirmation of Commitment between ICANN and the United States government is serious document. ICANN needs to keep its responsibilities in the Affirmation of Commitment and promote a higher quality in decision-making. Regarding the issue on the expansion of new gTLD’s, he pointed out tha U.S. government is expecting ICANN to issue a serious economic study since other government and organization expressed their concerns and cited that the cost of the large expansion of top level domain names outweighs the benefits. Furthermore, he stressed that one of the top challenges of ICANN is its relationship with foreign governments and the Governmental Advisory Committee is the perfect avenue for ICANN to reach out, deal with foreign governments and show the benefits of participating in the ICANN process.[8]

Issue on Co-Ownership Between Registries and Registrars for Existing and New gTLDs[edit | edit source]

On June 16, 2011, Strickling wrote to the ICANN Board through is Chairman Peter Dengate Thrush in conjunction with the implementation of the new gTLD programs. The DOC Assistant Secretary pointed out that some of the resolutions approved by the ICANN Board will affect the competition within the DNS market place such as the non-restriction for cross-ownership between registries and registrars and allowing the existing registry operators to adopt the new form of registry agreement once the new gTLD program is implemented. Strickling pointed out that it is critical to preserve competition as well as consumer protection. He advised the ICANN Board to evaluate and consider the concerns raised by the European Commission and other competition authorities before implementing the changes adopted by the Board regarding the restriction changes on cross-ownership between registries and registrars for existing and new gTLDs. Furthermore, he shared the evaluation and advise provided by the U.S. Department of Justice Anti-Trust Division regarding the issues.[9]

Speech During the IGF USA Meeting[edit | edit source]

In a speech delivered during the Internet Governance Forum USA Meeting on July 18, 2011, Strickling reiterated the United States government's commitment to the multi-stakeholder governance model of the internet. He stressed that he is pleased with ICANN's move in adopting the 27 accountability and transparency recommendations he submitted to the Board including the suggestions of GAC in connection with gTLDs. He encouraged the ICANN Staff to implement the recommendations "rapidly and thoroughly." The NTIA Assistant Secreatary also acknowledge the reality that not all proposals were not included in the Final Applicant Guidebook but it doesn't mean that the process is a failure or a setback in progress but a reflection of the reality of the multi-stakeholder model. He also emphasized the United States governments strong opposition regarding the proposal of some nations for a treaty approach model for internet governance. He further encouraged the IGF attendees to "advocate for a multi-stakeholder approach, not a treaty-based approach to developing policy." [10] [11]

Issue on ICANN Ethics and Conflict of Interest[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]