Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| * The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/> | | * The pros and cons of encouraging or permitting adversarial interactions <br/> |
| ::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard: Full Consensus, to the next level: General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates." | | ::[[Ron Andruff]] proffered, "The [[Consensus Policy|consensus]] model needs to be revised from meeting the highest standard: Full Consensus, to the next level: General Consensus with dissenting opinions. That change would better inform the debates." |
− | * whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/> | + | * Whether ICANN's role in [[Internet Governance]] should be streamlined <br/> |
| ::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.” | | ::[[Jorge Cancio]] said, "We stay in the weeds now" (as compared with work as recent as 2008) and argued that “ICANN should stay at the principle level, lean, and future proof.” |
| * The backlog of unimplemented policies, some of which are now out-of-date or conflict with current work <br/> | | * The backlog of unimplemented policies, some of which are now out-of-date or conflict with current work <br/> |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| * How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/> | | * How ICANN can better involve the Global South <br/> |
| :: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners. | | :: [[Claire Craig]] explained that ICANN must work with governments in developing nations, as they are the key access points. There are few if any capacity-building programs there, and the ICANN communities are too small; it's about striving toward equity, not equality. [[Jovan Kurbalija]] agreed, suggesting that the model should 1) embrace the public good aspect of ICANN (it's not just commercial); 2) that the pandemic made governments much stronger as it did tech; 3) ICANN should work with [[IGF]] to get more involved with politics because it’s trying to exist too far from the political center; and 4) ICANN needs to educate the general public to gain prominence via boundary spanners. |
| + | ====Impact of Regulatory Developments==== |
| | | |
− | ====Impact of Regulatory Developments====
| |
| ====Reputation Block Lists==== | | ====Reputation Block Lists==== |
| | | |