Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| | | |
| ==Criticism== | | ==Criticism== |
| + | * [[Sarah Clayton]] argues that the 12 defined conditions of non-disclosure (DCND) "essentially provide an administrative loophole for ICANN to restrict the free flow of information."<ref>[http://sunbelt2016.insna.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016-Sunbelt-Program_040516_FINAL_wchange-for-online.pdf International Sunbelt Social Network Conference 2016]</ref> Furthermore, her statistical p* models demonstrate that |
| + | *# [[ICANN Organization]] considers lengthier submissions to be more likely to request contentious information and are more likely to apply DCND to them |
| + | *# ICANN [[Stakeholder Group]]s/[[Working Group]]s are more likely to receive DCND in every condition category, except the "Affects Individual" condition |
| + | *# "Burdensome conditions" are rarely imposed on [[:Category:Legal Practices|law firms]], which tend to request precise information about a specific case |
| + | *# [[Registrant]]s are less likely to receive ICANN "Integrity" conditions as they are more concerned about their own domain name registrations than about ICANN |
| + | *# "Confidential External Business Information" conditions are less likely to be imposed on internet [[:Category:Non-Profit|non-profits]], as they are more interested in ICANN’s interface with [[Internet Governance]] than third-party business interests.<ref>[file:///C:/Users/jesri/Downloads/sclaydidp%20(1).pdf Sarah Clayton, Which Authors of ICANN Documentary Information Disclosure Policy Requests Are Likely to Receive Defined Conditions of Non-Disclosure in ICANN’s Response?]</ref> |
| | | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |