.style: Difference between revisions
Appearance
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
# [[Donuts]] (Binky Moon, LLC), submitted a total of 307 applications. | # [[Donuts]] (Binky Moon, LLC), submitted a total of 307 applications. | ||
# [[Uniregistry]] Corp., Domainer [[Frank Schilling]]'s company submitted 54 applications.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/06/13/here-are-the-54-new-gtlds-that-frank-schillings-uniregistry-applied-for/ Here are the 54 New gTLDs That Frank Schillings Uniregistry applied for, TheDomains.com]</ref> | # [[Uniregistry]] Corp., Domainer [[Frank Schilling]]'s company submitted 54 applications.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/06/13/here-are-the-54-new-gtlds-that-frank-schillings-uniregistry-applied-for/ Here are the 54 New gTLDs That Frank Schillings Uniregistry applied for, TheDomains.com]</ref> | ||
==Objection== | |||
Saudi Arabia's Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) filed an objection against the TLD.<ref>[http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2012/08/16/icann_top_level_domain_applications_saudi_arabia_apparently_objects_to_catholic_gay_bible_.html?from=rss/&wpisrc=newsletter_slatest Saudi Arabia Apparently Objects to .Catholic, .Gay, .Bible, and 28 More Proposed New Top-Level Domains, slate.com]</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 20:23, 16 October 2012
Status: | Proposed |
country: | International |
Type: | Generic |
Category: | Lifestyle |
More information: |
.style is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.
Current Applicants[edit | edit source]
- Momentous submitted 4 total applications, this one under Evolving Style Registry Inc.. [1]
- Top Level Domain Holdings Ltd., it is one of 68 applications that the company has filed for on its own behalf.[2]
- Top Level Design, submitted 10 total applications.
- Donuts (Binky Moon, LLC), submitted a total of 307 applications.
- Uniregistry Corp., Domainer Frank Schilling's company submitted 54 applications.[3]
Objection[edit | edit source]
Saudi Arabia's Communications and Information Technology Commission (CITC) filed an objection against the TLD.[4]