New Top-Level Domain Applicant Group: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==NTAG & ICANN== | ==NTAG & ICANN== | ||
In September 2012, NTAG addressed a letter to ICANN staff, summarizing the consensus support of NTAG members on the increase of support for and communication with [[new gTLD]] applicants.<ref name="newsletter">[http://www.gtldregistries.org/sites/gtldregistries.org/files/NTAG-October_Newsletter_0.pdf NTAG October Newsletter], gTLDRegistries.org. Published October 2012.</ref> | In September 2012, NTAG addressed a letter to ICANN staff, summarizing the consensus support of NTAG members on the increase of support for and communication with [[new gTLD]] applicants.<ref name="newsletter">[http://www.gtldregistries.org/sites/gtldregistries.org/files/NTAG-October_Newsletter_0.pdf NTAG October Newsletter], gTLDRegistries.org. Published October 2012.</ref> | ||
They summarized the following points and critiques in processing the new gTLDs:<ref name="scribd">[http://www.scribd.com/doc/105540989/Communications-and-Support-NTAG-to-ICANN Communications and Support NTAG to ICANN], Scribd.com. Retrieved 23 November 2012.</ref> | |||
# ICANN should continue to conduct regularly scheduled webinars, but after critiquing ICANN's first webinar on August 9, 2012, NTAG believes that the webinars should have lengthened durations, to allow more time for Q&A sessions. The webinars should be more interactive and scheduled on a biweekly basis, with at least three weeks notice prior to each event. | # ICANN should continue to conduct regularly scheduled webinars, but after critiquing ICANN's first webinar on August 9, 2012, NTAG believes that the webinars should have lengthened durations, to allow more time for Q&A sessions. The webinars should be more interactive and scheduled on a biweekly basis, with at least three weeks notice prior to each event. | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
# ICANN's New gTLD Program Director sho regularly attend NTAG's bi-weekly teleconferences to provide updates on the program. | # ICANN's New gTLD Program Director sho regularly attend NTAG's bi-weekly teleconferences to provide updates on the program. | ||
NTAG also expressed full support of a September 1 letter submitted by the [[RySG]], entitled Timelines and Milestones in New gTLD program.<ref name="scribd"> | NTAG also expressed full support of a September 1 letter submitted by the [[RySG]], entitled Timelines and Milestones in New gTLD program.<ref name="scribd"></ref> | ||
NTAG also wrote a letter to the IN CEO, Board, and gTLD Program Commitee Chair expressing that they found an extended objection period beyond ICANN's established January 13th, 2013 date would be unnecessary.<ref name="newsletter"></ref> | NTAG also wrote a letter to the IN CEO, Board, and gTLD Program Commitee Chair expressing that they found an extended objection period beyond ICANN's established January 13th, 2013 date would be unnecessary.<ref name="newsletter"></ref> |
Revision as of 19:40, 23 November 2012
The New Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (or NTAG) is an interest group formed under Article III.D. of the Charter of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG). The primary role of the NTAG is to represent the interests of entities that applied for a new gTLD(s) in ICANN’s 2012 gTLD round. The NTAG represents the views of its members to the RySG, the GNSO Council, the ICANN Board of Directors, and other influential bodies.
All applicants who have applied in the 2012 gTLD round are eligible for membership. Upon delegation of their string(s) to the ICANN root, they will be eligible for full membership in the RySG.[1]
NTAG & ICANN
In September 2012, NTAG addressed a letter to ICANN staff, summarizing the consensus support of NTAG members on the increase of support for and communication with new gTLD applicants.[2]
They summarized the following points and critiques in processing the new gTLDs:[3]
- ICANN should continue to conduct regularly scheduled webinars, but after critiquing ICANN's first webinar on August 9, 2012, NTAG believes that the webinars should have lengthened durations, to allow more time for Q&A sessions. The webinars should be more interactive and scheduled on a biweekly basis, with at least three weeks notice prior to each event.
- ICANN should take applicant comments into account prior to any decisionmaking process.
- ICANN should publish and regularly update a process dashboard or scorecard that includes metrics related to the status of background checks, initial evaluation reviews, string similarity reviews, withdrawn applicants, and budget information.
- ICANN should conduct an applicant survey to gather additional information for refining processes, with details and questions that NTAG hopes to aid with.
- ICANN should designate one or more new gTLD Applicant Liaison(s) to interact with and offer support to the community's 1,930 applicants.
- ICANN should publish the guidelines the ICANN Staff and Board have developed on appropriate interactions with applicants, so that applicants can understand and adhere to requirements.
- ICANN's New gTLD Program Director sho regularly attend NTAG's bi-weekly teleconferences to provide updates on the program.
NTAG also expressed full support of a September 1 letter submitted by the RySG, entitled Timelines and Milestones in New gTLD program.[3]
NTAG also wrote a letter to the IN CEO, Board, and gTLD Program Commitee Chair expressing that they found an extended objection period beyond ICANN's established January 13th, 2013 date would be unnecessary.[2]
Current Officers
- Jon Nevett, Donuts Inc., Chair
- Bill Doshier, dotStrategy Co., Vice Chair
- Tim Switzer, DotGreen Community Inc., Treasurer
- Krista Papac, Aremi Group, Secretary
NTAG Teams
In September 2012, NTAG formed three new teams, responsible for monitoring developments within their area, updating memberships, and offering comment to the ICANN community as they deemed necessary. This resulted in eight total teams, broken down as follows:[2]
- Team 1: Overall New gTLD Timeline Including GAC Issues & ANA - Moving forward and completing timeline processes.
- Team 2: Batching/Sequencing/Metering - Idea formation and suggestions for sequencing and/or metering methods
- Team 3: 1000/year Rated Delegation Limit - Expand the perceived 1000/year addition to root
- Team 4: Operational Improvements - Increasing operational effectiveness.
- Team 5: Monthly Newsletter - Membership development and updates.
- Team 6: ICANN Survey - Constructing questions for applicant survey
- Team 7: Objection Period Response
- Team 8: 1 and 2 Character Names
References
- ↑ About NTAG, gTLDRegistries.org.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Communications and Support NTAG to ICANN, Scribd.com. Retrieved 23 November 2012.