Policy Process Steering Committee: Difference between revisions
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* GAC liaison: [[Bertrand de la Chapelle]] | * GAC liaison: [[Bertrand de la Chapelle]] | ||
* ALAC liaison: [[Alan Greenberg]], alternate: [[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]]<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/3.+SC+Charter SC Charter]</ref> | * ALAC liaison: [[Alan Greenberg]], alternate: [[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]].<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoppsc/3.+SC+Charter SC Charter]</ref> | ||
== Decision making of PPSC == | == Decision making of PPSC == |
Revision as of 02:12, 30 August 2011
The Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC) was established to review and recommend changes for GNSO policy-making processes. The main goal of PPSC was to develop recommendations for the process changes required by the GNSO Improvements Report and acknowledged by the Board.[1] The PPSC consisted of two teams, the Policy Development Process Work Team and the Working Group Work Team. The PPSC was terminated when the GNSO adopted the resolution 20110428-2 at its meeting held on 28 April 2011, although the Policy Development Process Work Team is still active.[2]
The PPSC was also assigned with the task of combining the results into a proposal, consisting of suggested bylaws changes for PDP process and guidelines for the working groups. The PPSC also used to consider whether any of its activities that needed recommendations need to be addressed with the formation of a new special team.
Other duties assigned to the PPSC by the GNSO Council were to provide guidelines to shape proper interaction between GNSO volunteers and the [ICANN]] staff, as well as duties related to establishing GNSO-related drafting team guidelines.[3]
PPSC Work Teams[edit | edit source]
The PPSC had two working teams, the first team known as the WG team was assigned with the job of developing a proposal for the sake of a new Working Group Model whereas the other team was known as the policy development process team or the PDP Team. The PPSC served as a coordinating body for these two teams.
Policy Development Process Work Team: Also known as the PDP-WT, this team was responsible for recommending changes to the Council and the community on the basis of an open community WG approach. It was responsible of reviewing the PDP in the Bylaws.
Working Group Work Team: Also known as the WG-WT, it was responsible mostly to provide the necessary recommendations related to the methods and processes that were involved in the new WG model. The WG-WT also had to provide suggestion for transition to the new model.[4][5]
Membership[edit | edit source]
The PPSC was comprised of the following members:
- 1 representative from each constituency (did not need to be a GNSO Council member)
- GNSO council chair or vice chair
- 1 Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO
Also included as appointed representatives/observers were liaisons from the GAC and ALAC.
Prior to being disbanded, the members of the PPSC were:
- Business Constituency: Mike Rodenbaugh, alternate: Zahid Jamil
- Intellectual Property Interests Constituency: J. Scott Evans (alternate Chair), alternate: Ute Decker
- ISP Constituency: Greg Ruth, alternate: Tony Harris
- Non-Commercial Users Constituency: Konstantinos Komaitis, alternate: Gabriel Piniero
- Registry Constituency: Jeff Neuman (Chair), alternate: Catherine Sigmar
- Registrar Constituency: Tim Ruiz, alternate: Tom Keller
- NCA: Avri Doria, alternate: Olga Cavalli
- GNSO Council (vice-)chair: Avri Doria, alternate: Chuck Gomes
- GAC liaison: Bertrand de la Chapelle
- ALAC liaison: Alan Greenberg, alternate: Cheryl Langdon-Orr.[6]
Decision making of PPSC[edit | edit source]
The decision making process of PPSC if not determined by the PPSC members, were taken by using "full consensus of the members" process.[7]
Important Decision making process points:
- PPSC recognizes that determining a “Rough Consensus”; where all point of views are discussed till the chair decides all possible perspectives have been covered, is an important issue that must be handled by the working Group WT.
- PPSC WT must strive to reach at a unanimous decision but it also realizes that this may not always be possible.
- All the Work Team rules are subject to change by the PPSC that can be according to the PPSC’s evaluation of Working Group Work Team’s recommendations.[8]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ SC Charter
- ↑ PPSC Home
- ↑ SC Charter
- ↑ SC Charter
- ↑ PPSC Work Teams
- ↑ SC Charter
- ↑ SC Charter
- ↑ Interim Work Team Rules revised 18 Feb 2009, Retrieved 20 May 2011