ICANN 54 Primer: Difference between revisions
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs) Added internal Links |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Important Issues== | ==Important Issues== | ||
===Domain Privacy=== | ===Domain Privacy=== | ||
The protocols and policy surrounding WHOIS have not changed much since its conception in the ARPANET days, but the use of WHOIS has changed dramatically. It has become a resource used by law enforcement, domain buyers and data miners alike. This has caused some to register their domains through privacy or proxy registration services. Recently the use of these services has become a center of debate and is one of the topics to look out for at this meeting. | The protocols and policy surrounding [[WHOIS]] have not changed much since its conception in the [[ARPANET]] days, but the use of WHOIS has changed dramatically. It has become a resource used by law enforcement, domain buyers and data miners alike. This has caused some to register their domains through privacy or proxy registration services. Recently the use of these services has become a center of debate and is one of the topics to look out for at this meeting. | ||
For more information, check out our article on [[Domain Privacy]]. | For more information, check out our article on [[Domain Privacy]]. | ||
===IANA Transition=== | ===IANA Transition=== | ||
On March 14, 2015 the US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) announced that it intended to transition stewardship of key internet domain name functions to the global multistakeholder community. However, the NTIA stated that the transfer would not occur until ICANN develops a proposal that meets a number of requirements and | On March 14, 2015 the US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration ([[NTIA]]) announced that it intended to transition stewardship of key internet domain name functions to the global [[Multistakeholder Model|multistakeholder]] community. However, the NTIA stated that the transfer would not occur until [[ICANN]] develops a proposal that meets a number of requirements and has broad community support. | ||
The transition was originally set to take place on 30 September 2015, when that contract term expired, but it became increasingly evident that more time would be required for ICANN to develop an acceptable proposal. The NTIA preemptively extended the contract to 30 September 2016, giving ICANN more time to prepare for the transition. This promises to be an important topic to watch at this meeting. | The transition was originally set to take place on 30 September 2015, when that contract term expired, but it became increasingly evident that more time would be required for ICANN to develop an acceptable proposal. The NTIA preemptively extended the contract to 30 September 2016, giving ICANN more time to prepare for the transition. This promises to be an important topic to watch at this meeting. | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
===Accountability=== | ===Accountability=== | ||
Since the time ICANN was created, it has been held accountable by the The US government's control of the IANA function. The process of maintaining this accountability after the IANA transition occurs is an extremely important step to be taken before the transition can move forward. ICANN Identified a number of requirements to be met by the proposal before the transition occurs. However, some believe the entire plan is ultimately dependent on improvements to ICANN’s processes and accountability. | Since the time [[ICANN]] was created, it has been held accountable by the The US government's control of the [[IANA]] function. The process of maintaining this accountability after the IANA transition occurs is an extremely important step to be taken before the transition can move forward. ICANN Identified a number of requirements to be met by the proposal before the transition occurs. However, some believe the entire plan is ultimately dependent on improvements to ICANN’s processes and accountability. | ||
===New gTLD Program=== | ===New gTLD Program=== | ||
[[ICANN]]’s [[New gTLD Program]] was introduced in 2012 as a way to open up competition in the [[domain name]] markets. Rather than rely solely on the standard [[.com]], [[.edu]], etc., the new [[gTLD]]s have delivered broader options in meaning for consumers. Now that the first round of gTLDs have concluded, domainers and industry professionals have their eye on the future of these extensions--will these new top level domains edge into the mainstream, what are their best uses, and how will they succeed after so many years of .com? | |||
For more information, check out our article on the [[New gTLD Program]]. | For more information, check out our article on the [[New gTLD Program]]. | ||
===Finding the Next CEO=== | ===Finding the Next CEO=== | ||
In May 2015, ICANN announced that Fadi Chehade will be stepping down in March 2016, prior to the end of his contract which was set to expire in June 2017. ICANN established a search committee at ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires, to begin identifying candidates to fill the vacancy. The application period closed on 20 September 2015, beginning the selection process. | In May 2015, [[ICANN]] announced that [[Fadi Chehade]] will be stepping down in March 2016, prior to the end of his contract which was set to expire in June 2017. ICANN established a search committee at ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires, to begin identifying candidates to fill the vacancy. The application period closed on 20 September 2015, beginning the selection process. | ||
==Schedule by Topics== | ==Schedule by Topics== | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
!Definition | !Definition | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ICANN | |[[ICANN]] | ||
|Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers | |Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers | ||
|- | |- | ||
|AfriNIC | |[[AfriNIC]] | ||
|The African Network Information Center | |The African Network Information Center | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ALAC | |[[ALAC]] | ||
|At-Large Advisory Committee | |At-Large Advisory Committee | ||
|- | |- | ||
|APNIC | |[[APNIC]] | ||
|The Asia Pacific Network Information Centre | |The Asia Pacific Network Information Centre | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ARIN | |[[ARIN]] | ||
|American Registry for Internet Numbers | |American Registry for Internet Numbers | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ASO | |[[ASO]] | ||
|Address Supporting Organization | |Address Supporting Organization | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ccNSO | |[[ccNSO]] | ||
|Country-Code Names Supporting Organization | |Country-Code Names Supporting Organization | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ccTLD | |[[ccTLD]] | ||
|Country-Code Top Level Domain | |Country-Code Top Level Domain | ||
|- | |- | ||
|CCWG or CWG | |[[CCWG]] or [[CWG]] | ||
|Cross Community Working Group | |Cross Community Working Group | ||
|- | |- | ||
|DNS | |[[DNS]] | ||
|Domain Name System | |Domain Name System | ||
|- | |- | ||
|GAC | |[[GAC]] | ||
|Governmental Advisory Committee | |Governmental Advisory Committee | ||
|- | |- | ||
|GNSO | |[[GNSO]] | ||
|Generic Names Supporting Organization | |Generic Names Supporting Organization | ||
|- | |- | ||
|gTLD | |[[gTLD]] | ||
|Generic Top-Level Domain | |Generic Top-Level Domain | ||
|- | |- | ||
|IANA | |[[IANA]] | ||
|Internet Assigned Numbers Authority | |Internet Assigned Numbers Authority | ||
|- | |- | ||
|IDN | |[[IDN]] | ||
|Internationalized Domain Names | |Internationalized Domain Names | ||
|- | |- | ||
|IETF | |[[IETF]] | ||
|Internet Engineering Task Force | |Internet Engineering Task Force | ||
|- | |- | ||
|IP | |[[IP]] | ||
|Internet Protocol | |Internet Protocol | ||
|- | |- | ||
|IPv4 | |[[IPv4]] | ||
|Internet Protocol version 4 | |Internet Protocol version 4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|IPv6 | |[[IPv6]] | ||
|Internet Protocol Version 6 | |Internet Protocol Version 6 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ISOC | |[[ISOC]] | ||
|Internet Society | |Internet Society | ||
|- | |- | ||
|ISP | |[[ISP]] | ||
|Internet Service Provider | |Internet Service Provider | ||
|- | |- | ||
|LACNIC | |[[LACNIC]] | ||
|Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses Registry | |Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses Registry | ||
|- | |- | ||
|NTIA | |[[NTIA]] | ||
|US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration | |US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration | ||
|- | |- | ||
|OSC | |[[OSC]] | ||
|Operations Steering Committee | |Operations Steering Committee | ||
|- | |- | ||
|PDP | |[[PDP]] | ||
|Policy Development Process | |Policy Development Process | ||
|- | |- | ||
|RIR | |[[RIR]] | ||
|Regional Internet Registry | |Regional Internet Registry | ||
|- | |- | ||
|RSEP | |[[RSEP]] | ||
|Registry Services Evaluation Proccess | |Registry Services Evaluation Proccess | ||
|- | |- | ||
|RSSAC | |[[RSSAC]] | ||
|Root Server System Advisory Committee | |Root Server System Advisory Committee | ||
|- | |- | ||
|SSR | |[[SSR]] | ||
|Security, Stability, and Resiliency | |Security, Stability, and Resiliency | ||
|- | |- | ||
|SSAC | |[[SSAC]] | ||
|Security and Stability Advisory Committee | |Security and Stability Advisory Committee | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TLD | |[[TLD]] | ||
|Top Level Domain | |Top Level Domain | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TLG | |[[TLG]] | ||
|Technical Liaison Group | |Technical Liaison Group | ||
|- | |- | ||
|UDRP | |[[UDRP]] | ||
|Uniform Dispute Resolution Process | |Uniform Dispute Resolution Process | ||
|- | |- | ||
|URS | |[[URS]] | ||
|Uniform Rapid Suspension System | |Uniform Rapid Suspension System | ||
|- | |- | ||
|W3C | |[[W3C]] | ||
|World Wide Web Consortium | |World Wide Web Consortium | ||
|- | |- | ||
|WIPO | |[[WIPO]] | ||
|World Intellectual Property Organization | |World Intellectual Property Organization |
Revision as of 19:29, 21 September 2015
Welcome to Dublin |
Important Issues[edit | edit source]
Domain Privacy[edit | edit source]
The protocols and policy surrounding WHOIS have not changed much since its conception in the ARPANET days, but the use of WHOIS has changed dramatically. It has become a resource used by law enforcement, domain buyers and data miners alike. This has caused some to register their domains through privacy or proxy registration services. Recently the use of these services has become a center of debate and is one of the topics to look out for at this meeting.
For more information, check out our article on Domain Privacy.
IANA Transition[edit | edit source]
On March 14, 2015 the US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) announced that it intended to transition stewardship of key internet domain name functions to the global multistakeholder community. However, the NTIA stated that the transfer would not occur until ICANN develops a proposal that meets a number of requirements and has broad community support.
The transition was originally set to take place on 30 September 2015, when that contract term expired, but it became increasingly evident that more time would be required for ICANN to develop an acceptable proposal. The NTIA preemptively extended the contract to 30 September 2016, giving ICANN more time to prepare for the transition. This promises to be an important topic to watch at this meeting.
For More Information, check out our article on the IANA Transition.
Accountability[edit | edit source]
Since the time ICANN was created, it has been held accountable by the The US government's control of the IANA function. The process of maintaining this accountability after the IANA transition occurs is an extremely important step to be taken before the transition can move forward. ICANN Identified a number of requirements to be met by the proposal before the transition occurs. However, some believe the entire plan is ultimately dependent on improvements to ICANN’s processes and accountability.
New gTLD Program[edit | edit source]
ICANN’s New gTLD Program was introduced in 2012 as a way to open up competition in the domain name markets. Rather than rely solely on the standard .com, .edu, etc., the new gTLDs have delivered broader options in meaning for consumers. Now that the first round of gTLDs have concluded, domainers and industry professionals have their eye on the future of these extensions--will these new top level domains edge into the mainstream, what are their best uses, and how will they succeed after so many years of .com?
For more information, check out our article on the New gTLD Program.
Finding the Next CEO[edit | edit source]
In May 2015, ICANN announced that Fadi Chehade will be stepping down in March 2016, prior to the end of his contract which was set to expire in June 2017. ICANN established a search committee at ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires, to begin identifying candidates to fill the vacancy. The application period closed on 20 September 2015, beginning the selection process.
Schedule by Topics[edit | edit source]
(Insert Schedule Here)
Venue Map[edit | edit source]
(Insert Map here)
ICANN Board[edit | edit source]
Committees[edit | edit source]
A = Audit, C = Compensation, E = Executive, BG = Board Governance, NGP = New gTLD Program, R = Risk, OEC = Organizational Effectiveness Committee, F = Finance
Board Members[edit | edit source]
Fadi Chehadé, CEO & President (September 2012 - March 2016) E, NGP
Steve Crocker, Chair (November 2008 - AGM 2014) A, C, E, NGP
Bruce Tonkin, Vice-Chair (June 2007 - AGM 2016) BG, C, E
Rinalia Abdul Rahim (October 2014 - AGM 2017) NGP, R, OEC
Cherine Chalaby (December 2010 - AGM 2016) F, NGP, BG, E
Chris Disspain (June 2011 - AGM 2017) BG, F, NGP
Asha Hemrajani (October 2014 - AGM 2017) F, NGP
Wolfgang Kleinwächter (November 2013 - AGM 2015)OEC
Markus Kummer (October 2014 - AGM 2017) OEC
Bruno Lanvin (November 2014 - AGM 2017) F, NGP, OEC
Erika Mann (December 2010 - November 2016) A, C, BG, NGP
Gonzalo Navarro (October 2009 - AGM 2015) F, BG, NGP
Raymond A. Plzak (May 2009 - AGM 2015) OEC, A, NGP
George Sadowsky (October 2009 - AGM 2015) C, A, NGP
Michael Silber (May 2009 - AGM 2015) R, BG, NGP
Kuo-Wei Wu (April 2010 - AGM 2016) NGP, R, OEC
AGM = Annual General Meeting
Acronym Glossary[edit | edit source]
Acronym | Definition |
---|---|
ICANN | Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers |
AfriNIC | The African Network Information Center |
ALAC | At-Large Advisory Committee |
APNIC | The Asia Pacific Network Information Centre |
ARIN | American Registry for Internet Numbers |
ASO | Address Supporting Organization |
ccNSO | Country-Code Names Supporting Organization |
ccTLD | Country-Code Top Level Domain |
CCWG or CWG | Cross Community Working Group |
DNS | Domain Name System |
GAC | Governmental Advisory Committee |
GNSO | Generic Names Supporting Organization |
gTLD | Generic Top-Level Domain |
IANA | Internet Assigned Numbers Authority |
IDN | Internationalized Domain Names |
IETF | Internet Engineering Task Force |
IP | Internet Protocol |
IPv4 | Internet Protocol version 4 |
IPv6 | Internet Protocol Version 6 |
ISOC | Internet Society |
ISP | Internet Service Provider |
LACNIC | Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses Registry |
NTIA | US Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration |
OSC | Operations Steering Committee |
PDP | Policy Development Process |
RIR | Regional Internet Registry |
RSEP | Registry Services Evaluation Proccess |
RSSAC | Root Server System Advisory Committee |
SSR | Security, Stability, and Resiliency |
SSAC | Security and Stability Advisory Committee |
TLD | Top Level Domain |
TLG | Technical Liaison Group |
UDRP | Uniform Dispute Resolution Process |
URS | Uniform Rapid Suspension System |
W3C | World Wide Web Consortium |
WIPO | World Intellectual Property Organization |