Jump to content

Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
JP (talk | contribs)
JP (talk | contribs)
Line 14: Line 14:


#Gaining & Losing Registrar [[Form of Authorization]] (“FOA”);
#Gaining & Losing Registrar [[Form of Authorization]] (“FOA”);
#[[Authcode]] Management;
#[[AuthInfo Code]] Management;
#Change of [[Registrant]];
#Change of [[Registrant]];
#[[Transfer Emergency Action Contact]] (“TEAC”);
#[[Transfer Emergency Action Contact]] (“TEAC”);
Line 20: Line 20:
#Reversing/[[NACK]]ing Transfers;
#Reversing/[[NACK]]ing Transfers;
#ICANN-Approved Transfers; and
#ICANN-Approved Transfers; and
#Recommendation 27 of the [[Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (EPDP)]]<ref name="fir">[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/final-issue-report-pdp-transfer-policy-review-12jan21-en.pdf GNSO - Final Issue Report on a PDP to Review the Transfer Policy], February 20, 2021</ref>
#Recommendation 27 of the [[Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (EPDP)]], as it relates to FOA, change of registrant, and TDRP proceedings.<ref name="fir">[https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/final-issue-report-pdp-transfer-policy-review-12jan21-en.pdf GNSO - Final Issue Report on a PDP to Review the Transfer Policy], February 20, 2021</ref>
 
The working group divided the work into phases:
'''Phase 1(a)''' - FOA and AuthInfo Codes, and EPDP Temp Spec Recommendation 27 re: FOA;
'''Phase 1(b)''' - Change of Registrant and EPDP Temp Spec Recommendation 27 re: change of registrant issues;
'''Phase 2''' - Transfer Emergency Action, Reversing Transfers, Denying (NACKing) Transfers, ICANN-Approved Transfers, TDRP, and EPDP Temp Spec Recommendation 27 re: TDRP<ref>[https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/167543675/TPR%20Initial%20Report%20Draft%20-%2029%20April%202022.pdf PDP Transfer Policy Draft Initial Report, Phase 1(a)], April 29, 2022</ref>


==History and Work Progress==
==History and Work Progress==

Revision as of 17:22, 6 May 2022

Policy Development Process to Review the Transfer Policy
Status: Active
Issue Areas: Tranfer Policy
Date Established: February 20, 2021
Charter: [ WG Charter]
Workspace: [ Community Wiki]

The Policy Development Process to review Transfer Policy (PDPRTP) is a GNSO PDP initiated by the GNSO Council on February 18, 2021.[1]

Focus and Charter Questions[edit | edit source]

The PDP Charter specifies that the Working Group "is to conduct a review of the Transfer Policy and determine if changes to the policy are needed to improve the ease, security, and efficacy of inter-registrar and inter-registrant transfers." [2] The Final Issue Report identified questions and issues related to eight topics:

  1. Gaining & Losing Registrar Form of Authorization (“FOA”);
  2. AuthInfo Code Management;
  3. Change of Registrant;
  4. Transfer Emergency Action Contact (“TEAC”);
  5. Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy (“TDRP”);
  6. Reversing/NACKing Transfers;
  7. ICANN-Approved Transfers; and
  8. Recommendation 27 of the Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (EPDP), as it relates to FOA, change of registrant, and TDRP proceedings.[3]

The working group divided the work into phases: Phase 1(a) - FOA and AuthInfo Codes, and EPDP Temp Spec Recommendation 27 re: FOA; Phase 1(b) - Change of Registrant and EPDP Temp Spec Recommendation 27 re: change of registrant issues; Phase 2 - Transfer Emergency Action, Reversing Transfers, Denying (NACKing) Transfers, ICANN-Approved Transfers, TDRP, and EPDP Temp Spec Recommendation 27 re: TDRP[4]

History and Work Progress[edit | edit source]

The Final Issue Report was presented to the GNSO Council in advance of their February council meeting.[5] After initiation of the project at the February council meeting, the GNSO publicly launched the project at ICANN 70 with an introductory session.[6] The session provided an overview of the issue areas, identified ways for community members to participate, and described the composition and sources of the Working Group membership.[7]

Initial Report & Public Comment[edit | edit source]

The working group intends to publish its Initial Report in June 2022.[8]

References[edit | edit source]