ICANN 03: Difference between revisions
Christiane (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "Key Sessions" to "Key sessions" |
|||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ICANNMeetings| | {{ICANNMeetings| | ||
| logo = ICANNLogo.png | | logo = ICANNLogo.png | ||
| dates = | | dates = 23-26 August, 2009 | ||
| location = Santiago, Chile | | location = Santiago, Chile | ||
| website = [http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/santiago/ ICANN 3] | | website = [http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/santiago/ ICANN 3] | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| registration = | | registration = | ||
| keyappointments = | | keyappointments = | ||
| historicalimport = Board approves the implementation of the [[UDRP]] | | historicalimport = Board approves the implementation of the [[UDRP]], creation of the [[ASO]] and [[PSO]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''ICANN 3''' was held in Santiago, Chile, in August 1999. The meeting followed the same structure as previous meetings, and many of the sessions were broadcast over the Internet. All meetings were held at the College of Economic Sciences of the University of Chile <ref>[http:// | '''ICANN 3''' was held in Santiago, Chile, in August 1999. The meeting followed the same structure as previous meetings, and many of the sessions were broadcast over the Internet. All meetings were held at the College of Economic Sciences of the University of Chile <ref name="archive">[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/santiago/ ICANN 3 Archive]</ref>. Webcasting and scribing services were provided by the [[Berkman Center for Internet and Society]].<ref>[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/santiago/archive/ Berkman Center - ICANN 3 Meeting Proceedings Archive]</ref> | ||
==UDRP== | ==Key developments== | ||
==Outcomes== | |||
===UDRP=== | |||
The board took further steps in the creation of the [[Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy]], approving the implementation of such a policy and offering the following guidance: | The board took further steps in the creation of the [[Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy]], approving the implementation of such a policy and offering the following guidance: | ||
<blockquote>1. The registrars' Model Dispute Resolution Policy should be used as a starting point; | <blockquote>1. The registrars' Model Dispute Resolution Policy should be used as a starting point; <br /> | ||
2. The President or his delegate should convene a small drafting committee including persons selected by him to express views and consider the interests of the registrar, non-commercial, individual, intellectual property, and business interests; | 2. The President or his delegate should convene a small drafting committee including persons selected by him to express views and consider the interests of the registrar, non-commercial, individual, intellectual property, and business interests; <br /> | ||
3. In addition to the factors mentioned in paragraph 171(2) of the WIPO report, the following should be considered in determining whether a domain name was registered in bad faith:<br /> | 3. In addition to the factors mentioned in paragraph 171(2) of the WIPO report, the following should be considered in determining whether a domain name was registered in bad faith:<br /> | ||
(a) Whether the domain name holder is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the mark, without intent to misleadingly divert consumers for commercial gain or to tarnish the mark;<br /> | (a) Whether the domain name holder is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the mark, without intent to misleadingly divert consumers for commercial gain or to tarnish the mark;<br /> | ||
(b) Whether the domain name holder (including individuals, businesses, and other organizations) is commonly known by the domain name, even if the holder has acquired no trademark or service mark rights; and <br /> | (b) Whether the domain name holder (including individuals, businesses, and other organizations) is commonly known by the domain name, even if the holder has acquired no trademark or service mark rights; and <br /> | ||
(c) Whether, in seeking payment for transfer of the domain name, the domain name holder has limited its request for payment to its out-of-pocket costs. | (c) Whether, in seeking payment for transfer of the domain name, the domain name holder has limited its request for payment to its out-of-pocket costs. <br /> | ||
4. There should be a general parity between the appeal rights of complainants and domain name holders; and | 4. There should be a general parity between the appeal rights of complainants and domain name holders; and<br /> | ||
5. The dispute policy should seek to define and minimize reverse domain name hijacking.<ref name="resos">[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/santiago/santiago-resolutions.htm ICANN 3 Archive - Board Resolutions from the Santiago Meeting], August 26, 1999</ref></blockquote> | 5. The dispute policy should seek to define and minimize reverse domain name hijacking.<ref name="resos">[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/santiago/santiago-resolutions.htm ICANN 3 Archive - Board Resolutions from the Santiago Meeting], August 26, 1999</ref></blockquote> | ||
== | ===Formation of Supporting Organizations=== | ||
The [[Address Supporting Organization]] was approved as an affiliation of three [[regional internet registry|regional Internet registries]: [[RIPE NCC]], [[ARIN]], and [[APNIC]], operating under a Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN.<ref name="resos" /> In addition, having finalized a Memorandum of Understanding with the [[IETF]], [[W3C]], [[ITU]], and [[ETSI]], the board ratified that MOU and took steps to form the [[Protocol Supporting Organization]].<ref name="resos" /> | |||
==Key sessions== | |||
==ICANN Board== | |||
The Board of Directors at the time were: | |||
*[[Mike Roberts|Michael Roberts]] | |||
*[[Esther Dyson]] | |||
*[[Pindar Wong]] | |||
*[[Geraldine Capdeboscq]] | |||
*[[George Conrades]] | |||
*[[Greg Crew]] | |||
*[[Frank Fitzsimmons]] | |||
*[[Hans Kraaijenbrink]] | |||
*[[Jun Murai]] | |||
*[[Eugenio Triana]] | |||
*[[Linda Wilson]]. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
[ | [[Category:ICANN Meetings]] | ||
[ | |||
[[Category:Chile]] | [[Category:Chile]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:30, 2 May 2024
 | |
| Dates: | 23-26 August, 2009 |
| Location: | Santiago, Chile |
| Website: | ICANN 3 |
| Historical Significance | |
| Board approves the implementation of the UDRP, creation of the ASO and PSO | |
ICANN 3 was held in Santiago, Chile, in August 1999. The meeting followed the same structure as previous meetings, and many of the sessions were broadcast over the Internet. All meetings were held at the College of Economic Sciences of the University of Chile [1]. Webcasting and scribing services were provided by the Berkman Center for Internet and Society.[2]
Key developments[edit | edit source]
Outcomes[edit | edit source]
UDRP[edit | edit source]
The board took further steps in the creation of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy, approving the implementation of such a policy and offering the following guidance:
1. The registrars' Model Dispute Resolution Policy should be used as a starting point;
2. The President or his delegate should convene a small drafting committee including persons selected by him to express views and consider the interests of the registrar, non-commercial, individual, intellectual property, and business interests;
3. In addition to the factors mentioned in paragraph 171(2) of the WIPO report, the following should be considered in determining whether a domain name was registered in bad faith:
(a) Whether the domain name holder is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the mark, without intent to misleadingly divert consumers for commercial gain or to tarnish the mark;
(b) Whether the domain name holder (including individuals, businesses, and other organizations) is commonly known by the domain name, even if the holder has acquired no trademark or service mark rights; and
(c) Whether, in seeking payment for transfer of the domain name, the domain name holder has limited its request for payment to its out-of-pocket costs.
4. There should be a general parity between the appeal rights of complainants and domain name holders; and
5. The dispute policy should seek to define and minimize reverse domain name hijacking.[3]
Formation of Supporting Organizations[edit | edit source]
The Address Supporting Organization was approved as an affiliation of three [[regional internet registry|regional Internet registries]: RIPE NCC, ARIN, and APNIC, operating under a Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN.[3] In addition, having finalized a Memorandum of Understanding with the IETF, W3C, ITU, and ETSI, the board ratified that MOU and took steps to form the Protocol Supporting Organization.[3]
Key sessions[edit | edit source]
ICANN Board[edit | edit source]
The Board of Directors at the time were:
- Michael Roberts
- Esther Dyson
- Pindar Wong
- Geraldine Capdeboscq
- George Conrades
- Greg Crew
- Frank Fitzsimmons
- Hans Kraaijenbrink
- Jun Murai
- Eugenio Triana
- Linda Wilson.