Jump to content

Registries Stakeholder Group: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Jessica (talk | contribs)
Jintlaw (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


==Feedback==
==Feedback==
The most current and contentious debate between the Registry Stakeholder group and ICANN has been over the [[Registry Agreement]] related to New gTLD operators. Many members can be seen to represent not only their own applications but those of their clients, though forthcoming registry operators have also formed the separate [[NTAG|New TLD Applicant Group]] within ICANN.
* A list of RySG statements can be found on its website at: https://www.rysg.info/resources/statements/
 
* A list of RySG comments to ICANN public proceedings can be found at: https://www.rysg.info/resources/archive/
The RySG seems to be most strongly opposed to ICANN's attempt to integrate a "unilateral right to amend" into the Registry Agreement. The point would give the [[ICANN Board]] to amend the Agreement with a 2/3 majority vote, under the current registry agreement special amendments need the approval of registries representing two-thirds of all registry fees paid to ICANN before they became law. The RySG claims that ICANN is essentially doing away with the bottom-up multistakeholder model in favor of a restructuring that does not rely on [[GNSO]] policy development.<ref>[http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-base-agreement-05feb13/pdf9aMq5amCU0.pdf Comments Base Agreement 05Feb2013, Forum.ICANN.org] Retrieved 1 April 2013</ref> ICANN and its defenders claim that the change is necessary given the large amount of new registries to be created and prepare for any future Registry Agreements, where getting hundreds of operators to agree will be near impossible as evidenced by the 18 months spent working on the most recent [[Registrar Accreditation Agreement]] (RAA). The RAA put forth by ICANN around the same time as the Registry Agreement has an identical "unilateral right to amend" clause.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/11850-icann-seeks-more-power-over-new-gtld-registries ICANN Seeks More Power Over New gTLD Registries, DomainIncite.com] 1 April 2013</ref>
The RySG is one of the most active groups within the ICANN community and generally responds to all ICANN public comment periods except for those comment periods relating to a single registry operator (e.g., the renewal of an Registry Agreement or the approval of a particular Registry Service).
 
* [http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-base-agreement-05feb13/pdf9aMq5amCU0.pdf The RySG's initial feedback to the New gTLD Registry Agreement]


== Organization and Membership of the RySG ==
== Organization and Membership of the RySG ==


The membership of the RySG is open to all [[TLD]] Registries. Registries must apply for membership via the application process. Every Registry needs to identify a Voting Delegate and, if desired, alternate Voting Delegates.  The membership application can be found on the RySG website at:  https://www.rysg.info/join-us
The membership of the RySG is open to all [[gTLD]] Registries. Registries must apply for membership via the application process. Every Registry needs to identify a Voting Delegate and, if desired, alternate Voting Delegates.  The membership application can be found on the RySG website at:  https://www.rysg.info/join-us


===Funding===
===Funding===
Line 18: Line 16:


====Executive Committee====
====Executive Committee====
The RySG consists of an Executive Committee, which is comprised of a Chair, an Alternate Chair, and a Treasurer. The main responsibilities of the Executive Committee are to facilitate policy coordination meetings, to support the [[GNSO#GNSO Council|GNSO Council]] and the [[ICANN Board]], as requested by ICANN, and to manage and administer elections.  
The RySG consists of an Executive Committee, which is comprised of a Chair, a Vice Chair of Policy, a Vice Chair of Administration, and a Treasurer. The main responsibilities of the Executive Committee are to facilitate policy coordination meetings, to support the [[GNSO#GNSO Council|GNSO Council]] and the [[ICANN Board]], as requested by ICANN, and to manage and administer elections.  


* [[Donna Austin]], [[Neustar]], Chair Emeritus
* [[Beth Bacon]], [[PIR]], Chair
* [[Samantha Demetriou]], [[Verisign]], Chair,
* Catherine Paletta, [[Identity Digital]], Vice Chair, Policy
* [[Beth Bacon]], [[PIR]], Vice Chair, Policy
* [[Jeff Neuman]], JJN Solutions, Vice Chair, Administration
* [[Craig Schwartz]], [[FTLD Registry Services LLC|fTLD Registry Services]], Vice Chair, Administration
* [[Karen Day]], [[SAS Institute]], Treasurer
* [[Jonathan Robinson]], [[Ipracon Ltd]], Treasurer


====Secretariat====
====Secretariat====
Line 31: Line 28:
====GNSO Council Representatives====
====GNSO Council Representatives====
The following individuals represent the Registry Constituency and its views within the larger [[GNSO|Generic Name Supporting Organization]]:
The following individuals represent the Registry Constituency and its views within the larger [[GNSO|Generic Name Supporting Organization]]:
* [[Kurt Pritz]], North America, til [[AGM]] 2022
* [[Samantha Demetriou]], North America, til [[AGM]] 2026
* [[Sebastien Ducos]], Australia, til [[AGM]] 2021
* [[Jennifer Chung]], APAC, til [[AGM]] 2025
* [[Maxim Alzoba]], EU, til [[AGM]] 2022
* [[Nacho Amadoz]], EU, til [[AGM]] 2026


====ICANN [[Nominating Committee]] Representative====
====ICANN [[Nominating Committee|Nominatiog Committee]] Representative====
* [[Paul Diaz]], til [[AGM]] 2022
* Josu Wulina, til [[AGM]] 2025


==Interest Groups==
==Interest Groups==
Line 42: Line 39:


==Registry Constituency==
==Registry Constituency==
Prior to the GNSO restructuring, the Registries Stakeholder Group was known as the '''Registry Constituency'''. It was comprised of the [[Registry|registry]] operators for the [[.net]], [[.org]], [[.name]], [[.com]], [[.pro]], [[.museum]], [[.aero]], [[.coop]] and [[.info]] [[gTLD]]s, which were the only TLDs at the time.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/shanghai/gtld-statement-30oct02.htm gTLD statement; October 30, 2002]</ref>
Prior to the GNSO restructuring, the Registries Stakeholder Group was known as the '''Registry Constituency'''. It was comprised of the [[Registry|registry]] operators for the [[.com]]/[[.net]], [[.org]], [[.biz|.biz,]] [[.name]], [[.pro]], [[.museum]], [[.aero]], [[.coop]] and [[.info]] [[gTLD]]s, which were the only TLDs at the time.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/meetings/shanghai/gtld-statement-30oct02.htm gTLD statement; October 30, 2002]</ref> The first chair of the Registries Constituency (after it consisted of more than 1 member) and the Registries Stakeholder Group was [[Jeff Neuman]], who at the time represented [[Neustar|NeuLevel]] (later Neustar) and the [[.biz]] registry from 2001 - 2004.


==Associations==
==Associations==
Line 50: Line 47:


{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[category: Glossary]]
[[category: ICANN Bodies]]
[[category: ICANN Bodies]]

Latest revision as of 18:50, 6 February 2025

The gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group Corp. (RySG) is a Stakeholder Group within the Contracted Parties House under ICANN's GNSO. It represents the interests of the gTLD Registries currently under contract with ICANN and provides them with gTLD Registry Services. It also facilitates communication among the gTLD Registries and voices the views of the Registry Constituency to the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board of Directors, with a special emphasis on ICANN consensus policies, which relate to the technical reliability, interoperability and the stable operation of the Internet or DNS.[1]

Feedback[edit | edit source]

The RySG is one of the most active groups within the ICANN community and generally responds to all ICANN public comment periods except for those comment periods relating to a single registry operator (e.g., the renewal of an Registry Agreement or the approval of a particular Registry Service).

Organization and Membership of the RySG[edit | edit source]

The membership of the RySG is open to all gTLD Registries. Registries must apply for membership via the application process. Every Registry needs to identify a Voting Delegate and, if desired, alternate Voting Delegates. The membership application can be found on the RySG website at: https://www.rysg.info/join-us

Funding[edit | edit source]

Funding for the RySG is provided by its members. Every member joining the Group needs to pay an initial membership fee as well as a fixed annual membership fee and a variable annual membership fee as per the schedule of the RySG. A member loses its voting rights if it fails to pay the fees as previously invoiced within thirty days after a written notice of non-payment.[2]

Structure of the RySG[edit | edit source]

Executive Committee[edit | edit source]

The RySG consists of an Executive Committee, which is comprised of a Chair, a Vice Chair of Policy, a Vice Chair of Administration, and a Treasurer. The main responsibilities of the Executive Committee are to facilitate policy coordination meetings, to support the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board, as requested by ICANN, and to manage and administer elections.

Secretariat[edit | edit source]

GNSO Council Representatives[edit | edit source]

The following individuals represent the Registry Constituency and its views within the larger Generic Name Supporting Organization:

ICANN Nominatiog Committee Representative[edit | edit source]

  • Josu Wulina, til AGM 2025

Interest Groups[edit | edit source]

For the sake of collaborating on vital issues of common interest within the RySG, members self-organize themselves into different Interest Groups. The main responsibilities of these specific Interest Groups is to nominate candidates for GNSO Council Representatives, participate in the GNSO policy development processes, and develop position statements with special emphasis on the ICANN consensus policies.

Registry Constituency[edit | edit source]

Prior to the GNSO restructuring, the Registries Stakeholder Group was known as the Registry Constituency. It was comprised of the registry operators for the .com/.net, .org, .biz, .name, .pro, .museum, .aero, .coop and .info gTLDs, which were the only TLDs at the time.[3] The first chair of the Registries Constituency (after it consisted of more than 1 member) and the Registries Stakeholder Group was Jeff Neuman, who at the time represented NeuLevel (later Neustar) and the .biz registry from 2001 - 2004.

Associations[edit | edit source]

The RySG has two Associations within their membership: Brand Registry Group (BRG) and the GeoTLD Group.

References[edit | edit source]