Generic top-level domain

A Generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) is an internet extension with three or more characters. It is one of the categories of the top level domain(TLD) in the Domain Name System (DNS) maintained by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. There are 21 gTLDs in the root zone of the internet and they are categorized as:

• generic (.com,.info, .net, .org) which can be used for general purposes;
• sponsored, (.aero, .asia, .cat, .coop, .edu, .gov, .int, .jobs, .mil, .mobi, .tel and .travel) which can only be used by entities engaged within the specific industry;
• generic restricted (.biz, .name, .pro) which can be use only for their specified purposes and
• infrastructure(.arpa) is exclusively used to support operationally-critical infrastructural identifier spaces and it is operated by IANA.

The gTLDs are managed and operated by their sponsor organizations and or registry operators that were approved by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.

Background

In 1984, Jon Postel and Joyce Reynolds published RFC 920 which proposed the introduction of top level domain names (TLDs) in the root zone of the internet. RFC 920 also described the categories and general purposes of the initial TLDs which include: .arpa, (temporary and intended for the transition from ARPA to Internet) .gov (government) .edu, (education) .com, (commercial) .mil (military) .org (organization) and the two-letter code (alpha-2) of the ISO-3166-1 list which represents the names of countries. On January 1985, the initial TLDs including .net were implemented in the root zone of the internet. The .gov and .mil gTLDs were restricted for the United States government and military use only while .edu, .com, .org and .net are open for registration. In 1988, the .int was introduced by IANA for international organizations established by treaties.

The original TLDs were managed and administered by the Network Information Center, the first assigned registrar responsible in hosting and registering the domain names. NIC was operated by SRI International.

In 1994, Postel released RFC 1591 which explained the entire structure of the DNS and specified that the original TLDs (.com, .edu, .gov .mil, .net, .org and .int) are categorized as generic top level domains (gTLDs) and the two-letter country codes from ISO-3166 list. It was mentioned in the RFC that introduction of new TLDs will be unlikely.

On July 1, 1997, President Bill Clinton instructed the Department of Commerce to improve the operations of the internet by transferring the technical management of the DNS to a private organization that will be responsible in increasing competition and encouraging international participation. The directive was part of the Clinton Administration's Framework for Global Electronic Commerce. The following day, a Request For Comment (RFC) was released by the National Telecommunication Information Administration (NTIA) to the public to submit their comments and recommendations on the government plan. The NTIA received 430 comments from the internet community. On January 30, 1998, the Green Paper was released under which, majority of the internet community expressed their dissatisfaction of the management of the DNS and preferred a new private organization to handle the technical management of the DNS. The internet community also recommended the creation of new gTLDs. Based on the Green Paper, the new corporation should maintain stability, competition, private bottom-up coordination, and representation as the guiding principles for the new corporation.

By April of 1998, the White Paper was released by the Department of Commerce which calls for the creation of a new independent private non profit corporation to takeover the technical management of the DNS from the U.S. government. Subsequently, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Named and Numbers was created by the internet community on October 1998. Since ICANN's establishment, one of the its' main activities is focused on the introduction of new generic top level domains. In 1999, the ICANN Board delegated the Domain Name Supporting Organization (DNSO) to gather a public consensus regarding the issue. In response, the DNSO created the Working Group C to prepare proposals for the introduction of new gTLD. By October of 1999, Working Group C presented 7 position papers.

First Round: New gTLD Expansion

Recommendation for the Introduction of New GTLDs

On April 2000, the DNSO recommended to the ICANN Board to establish a policy for the introduction of new gTLDs. In addition, the DNSO also suggested to invite interested entities to submit their expressions of interest to become registry operators of new gTLDs.

Thousands of comments regarding the introduction of new gTLDs were received by the ICANN Board through the ICANN Public Comment Forum. Following the result of the public comment, the ICANN Board decided to establish a policy for the introduction of new gTLDs. The ICANN Board set up a schedule for the submission, acceptance and evaluation of proposals to operate or sponsor a new gTLD and a non-refundable application fee of $50,000.

ICANN Criteria for Assessing gTLD Proposals

On August 15, 2000, the ICANN Board issued the Criteria for Assessing the TLD Proposals which include:

• The need to maintain the Internet's stability.
• The extent to which selection of the proposal would lead to an effective "proof of concept" concerning the introduction of top-level domains in the future.
• The enhancement of competition for registration services.
• The enhancement of the utility of the DNS.
• The extent to which the proposal would meet previously unmet types of needs.
• The extent to which the proposal would enhance the diversity of the DNS and of registration services generally.
• The evaluation of delegation of policy-formulation functions for special-purpose TLDs to appropriate organizations.
• Appropriate protections of rights of others in connection with the operation of the TLD.
• The completeness of the proposals submitted and the extent to which they demonstrate realistic business, financial, technical, and operational plans and sound analysis of market needs.

The TLD Application Process: Information for Applicants was also released during the same date.

ICANN Selected Seven New gTLDs

ICANN received more than 40 applications. On November 16, 2000, the ICANN Board conducted a whole day discussion and open forum regarding the applications for new gTLD. After an extensive evaluation, the ICANN Board selected seven new gTLDs which include: (.biz) JVTeam, (.info) Afilias, (.name) Global Name Registry, (.pro) RegistryPro, (.museum) Museum Domain Management Association, (.aero) Société Internationale de Télécommunications Aéronautiques, and (.coop) Cooperative League of the USA dba National Cooperative Business Association. The authority to enter negotiation with the new gTLD's sponsors were given to the ICANN President and General Counsel.

On May 11, 2001, ICANN signed the .biz and .info Registry Agreements. The .name Registry agreement was approved on August 1, 2001, while .museum was signed on October 17, 2001, .coop was signed November 21, 2001, and .aero was registry agreement was signed on December 17, 2001 Meanwhile, the .pro registry agreement was approved on March 14, 2002.

Second Round: New gTLD Expansion

The New TLD Evaluation Process Planning Task Force (NTEPPTF) Report

During the ICANN Stockholm Meeting in 2001, the Board directed ICANN President Stuart Lynn to form and chair a New TLD Evaluation Process Planning Task Force (NTEPPTF)to monitor and evaluate the performance and impact on new gTLDs on the DNS, wherein the evaluation should concentrate on the technical and legal perspectives. By June of 2002, the NTEPPTF submitted its report and made the following recommendations to the ICANN Board:

• Establish a continuous monitoring program on the new gTLDs and focus the evaluation its effect to the performance of the root zone of the internet, identify the operational performance problems affecting the stability of the DNS, accuracy and completion of the Whois data, and the start-up issues during the sunrise or landrush period.
• The ICANN Board should adopt the evaluation schedule arranged by the Task Force.
• ICANN Board should determine the time frame and how it should launch new gTLDs.
• A TLD Evaluation Advisory Committee (TEAC) should be appointed by ICANN to provide an overall coordination and guidance to the evaluation team which shall be supervised by the ICANN Staff.
• Provide adequate funds to the evaluation process.
• Identify to what extent ICANN can initiate the planning and solicitations of proposals of new gTLDs in conjunction with the evaluation and monitoring process.

Subsequently on August 23, 2002, The ICANN Board directed ICANN President Lynn to create an action plan regarding the report of (NTEPPTF).

A Plan of Action regarding New gTLDs

On October 18, 2002, Lynn submitted a Plan of Action regarding New gTLDs and recommended the following:

• Instruct the ICANN Staff to solicit three or more proposals for sponsored TLDs (sTLDs]] as extension of the Proof of Concept, following a similar or streamlined criteria and ground rules, subject to funding a rapid study based on sampling techniques as appropriate. The study will assess if the new sponsored TLDs admitted registrants outside their charter and determine its extent.
• The issue of name space taxonomy should be addressed as a prerequisite to substantive expansion of the top level domain space regardless of an interim action on additional sponsored TLDs.
• Those applicants who submitted their proposals for new sponsored TLDs in 2000 should be invited to update and resubmit their proposals and new sponsored TLD proposals will also be accepted.
• Cost Allocation for the application fee should be assessed to exercise fairness and there should be a differential fee for those who have already paid the $50 000 application fee in year 2000 who have already been subjected to evaluation.
• The independent and financial evaluation process should be simplified particularly the review of financial capacity to accelerate the process and reduce cost.
• Use the existing contractual framework for the new sponsored TLDs.

Sponsored TLDs Application Process

On June 23, 2003, ICANN released the Request For Proposal (RFP) for the establishment of new sponsored top level domain names. The RFP emphasized that the requirements to operate a new sTLD is rigorous ad only applicants with high qualifications that will meet or exceed the selection criteria will be accepted. An additional $25 000 is required on top of the $ 50 000 application fee for those whose applications were already evaluated in 2000.

Evaluation Methodology and Selection Criteria

Based on the Evaluation Methodology and Selection Criteria released by ICANN on June 23, 2003, external consultants will evaluate the applications for new sTLDs. The ICANN Staff will not participate in the evaluation process but it will assist the consultants in compiling, synthesizing or tabulating information which will be reviewed by the ICANN Board. Meanwhile, the criteria for selecting new sTLDs include:

A. Applicants should provide evidence of ability to ensure stable registry operation.

• provide a detailed business plan to ensure satisfactory continuing registry operation
• ensure that the chosen registry operator will conform to high standards in technical operation of the new sTLD registry
• provide a full range of registry services
• ensure continuity of registry operation in the event of business failure of the proposed registry

B. Conform to requirements of sponsored TLD

• provide precise definition of Sponsored TLD Community(determine the persons and entities within the community)
• appropriateness of the Sponsoring Organization and the policy formulation environment
• responsiveness to Sponsored TLD Community
• demonstrate a large base of support from community

C. Add new value to the DNS

• value of name
• enhanced diversity of the DNS

D. Reach and enrich broad global communities

• demographic reach
• global reach and accessibility

E. Protect the rights of others

• assurance of charter-compliant registrations and avoidance of abusive registration practices
• assurance of adequate dispute-resolution mechanisms
• provision of ICANN-policy compliant Whois service

F. Provide complete and well-structured applications

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

Request For Comments

International Standards Organization

Deprecated. Domain Name Supporting Organization. Predecessor of the Generic Names Supporting Organization, which advised the Board with respect to policy issues relating to the Domain Name System (ICANN Bylaws).

Top-Level Domain