Jump to content

ICANN 06: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
JP (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197 edits
No edit summary
Christiane (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, steward, Administrators, translator
3,247 edits
m Text replacement - "Key Sessions" to "Key sessions"
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ICANNMeetings|
{{ICANNMeetings|
| logo            = ICANNLogo.png
| logo            = ICANNLogo.png
| dates          = 13th - 17th July 2000
| dates          = 13-17 July, 2000
| location        = Yokohama, japan
| location        = Yokohama, Japan
| host            = Japan
| host            = Japan
| venue        = Pacifico Yokohama Conference Center Yokohama, Japan
| venue        = Pacifico Yokohama Conference Center  
| website      = [http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/ ICANN 6]
| website      = [http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/ ICANN 6]
| historicalimport  =  
| historicalimport  =  
}}
}}


'''ICANN 6''' took place in Yokohama, Japan, and it was the first [[ICANN]] event to take place in Japan. The event was of a high interest and many persons had arrived for the meetings in which were to take place. The meetings took place in several hotels across Yokohama, including the Kaiyotei Hotel, Intercontinental Hotel and the main host the Pacifico Yokohama Conferance centre. [[ICANN]] 6 was seen to have been a very succsessful event as many issues were discussed and several were resolved. This meeting proved just how far the ICANN events had developed since its begining.  
'''ICANN 6''' took place in Yokohama, Japan, and was the first [[ICANN]] event to take place in Japan.  


The Meetings were free to attend by any interested person and as in previous [[ICANN]] events, there was also a remote participation facility, for persons who were unable to make the Event. The Local organizing committee for the event was Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC).
==Key developments==


==Meeting==
The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.<ref name="resos" /> A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.<ref "newTLDpaper">[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], June 13, 2000</ref> In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/newtlds/ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], July 12, 2000</ref> although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/nesson-tld-071500/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary], July 15, 2000</ref>.


The meetings for [[ICANN]] 6 were to be held over a six day period, which was to be the longest an ICANN event had ever been schedulaed for. However in previous events, you will have seen that each day was seen as a busy day, and the mettings were all one after the other, which could have been seen as too much to take in for one day. Many of the meetings that had taken place throughout the event were not behind closed doors and were all availble as an open forum, even the ICANN board of directors meeting was avilable as a webcast.  
The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from [[ICANN 05 - Cairo|ICANN 5]] in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/cctld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies], July 5, 2000</ref> The period for written public comments was very short,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000</ref> but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/scribe-icann-071500.html#cctld ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies], July 15, 2000</ref> The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/draft-cctld-status-quo-agreement-05jul00.htm ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement], July 5, 2000</ref> as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/cctld/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation], July 15, 2000</ref>


The meetings covered a variety of topics and sessions included:
==Outcomes==


*ICANN Board of Directors Meeting
===Bylaws Amendments===
The board approved bylaws amendments enabling the appointment of five "At-large" directors to the board in 2000, with an eventual total of nine At-large directors. A temporary, four-person nominating committee was formed to assist with the initial selection of At-large, and a temporary election committee was formed to ensure the election of such directors was supported, well-structured, and fair.<ref name="resos">[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/prelim-report-2000-07-16-en ICANN.org Archive - Meeting of the ICANN Board in Yokohama: Preliminary Report], July 16, 2000</ref> In addition, the board commissioned a ''tabula rasa'' study of At-large membership issues, including:
* Whether the ICANN Board should include "At Large" Directors;
* If so, how many such Directors there should be;
* How any such "At Large" Directors should be selected, including consideration of at least the following options: selection by an "At Large" membership; appointment by the existing Board; selection or appointment by some other entity or entities; and any combination of those options;
* If selection by an "At Large" membership is to be used, the processes and procedures by which that selection will take place; and
* What the appropriate structure, role and functions of an "At Large" membership should be.<ref name="resos" />


*ICANN Public Forum
The board set deadlines for the study to conclude and present findings by mid-2001, with the goal that the board would act on the findings and recommendations of the study by the time of the 2001 Annual Meeting.<ref name="resos" />


*Governmental Advisory Committee
===Policy Developments and Highlights===


*Domain Name Supporting Organization
The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.<ref name="resos" /> A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.<ref "newTLDpaper">[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], June 13, 2000</ref> In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/newtlds/ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], July 12, 2000</ref> although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/nesson-tld-071500/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary], July 15, 2000</ref>.


*Intellectual Property Constituency
The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from [[ICANN 05 - Cairo|ICANN 5]] in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/cctld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies], July 5, 2000</ref> The period for written public comments was very short,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000</ref> but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/scribe-icann-071500.html#cctld ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies], July 15, 2000</ref> The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/draft-cctld-status-quo-agreement-05jul00.htm ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement], July 5, 2000</ref> as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/cctld/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation], July 15, 2000</ref>


*ISPs and Connectivity Providers
===Social & Community Highlights===
The board acknowledged the work of [[Becky Burr]] in her role at the U.S. Department of Commerce in making ICANN a reality:
<blockquote>It would not be an overstatement to conclude that, without the enormous contributions of Becky Burr, ICANN would not be here today, or at a minimum would not have made the very significant progress that is reflected at this meeting. She could not have done it alone, but we could not have done what we have done without her tireless devotion to the objective of a viable and effective ICANN.<ref name="resos" /></blockquote>


*Non-commercial Domain Name Holders Constituency
==Key sessions==


A complete Agenda and Timetable for the event can be found [http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/ here]
==ICANN Board==


==Developments==
*[[Mike Roberts|Michael Roberts]]: President/CEO
 
*[[Esther Dyson]]: Chair
There were many talking point on all issues raised during this event. The open forum provided some key points all of which were up for a public commenting and disucssion, one main discussion was on new top level domains. During the course of this event it was recommended by the names ocuncil, that [[ICANN]]create a new system to over see new top level domains. New top level domains where to now undergo a careful evealuation.
*[[Pindar Wong]]: Vice-chair
 
*[[Geraldine Capdeboscq]]
The Names Council had taken note of the fact, that the working group C reports, had indicated that several types of internet domains should be considered in their initial introduction, these were: fully open top-level domains, restricted and chartered top-level domains with limited scope, non-commercial domains and personal domains.
*[[George Conrades]]
 
*[[Greg Crew]]
To assist the [[ICANN]] Board in this task of introducing new gTLDs, the Names Council had recommended that the [[ICANN]] staff should invite expressions of interest from certain parties seeking to operate any new gTLD registry, and they also should provde an indication as to how they propose to ensure to promote all values in this new system.
*[[Frank Fitzsimmons]]
 
*[[Hans Kraaijenbrink]]
==Historical Notes==
*[[Jun Murai]]
 
*[[Eugenio Triana]]
As a result of this event, there weere certain changes made to the way in which new Top level domains were accepted and chosen. Here are the new guidelines which were proposed in this meeting.
*[[Linda Wilson]]
 
*[[Jonathan Cohen]]
 
*[[Amadeu Abril i Abril]]
*The feasibilty and utility of different types of new TLDs.
*[[Robert Blokzijl]]
 
*[[Phil Davidson|Philip Davidson]]
*The efficacy of different procedures for launching new TLDs.
*[[Ken Fockler]]
 
*[[Jean-François Abramatic]]
*Different policies under which the TLDs can be administered in the longer term.
*[[Richard Thwaites]]
 
*[[Vint Cerf]]
*Different operational models for the registry and registrar functions.
*[[Alejandro Pisanty]]
 
*Different institutional structures for the formulation of registration and operation policies within the TLD.
 
 
The current SEO of [[ICANN]] at this time was [[Mike Roberts]]


==References==
==References==
[[http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm#IC ICANN Yokohama Website]]
{{reflist}}
 
[[http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm#IC The Introduction of new top level domains]]
 
[[http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/ The Agenda for the Event]]
 
==External Links==
 
[[http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm#IC ICANN Yokohama Website]]
 
[[http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm#IC The Introduction of new top level domains]]
 
[[http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/ The Agenda for the Event]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
[[Category: ICANN Meetings|ICANN 06]]
[[Category: ICANN Meetings]]
[[Category:Japan]]
[[Category:Japan]]

Latest revision as of 21:30, 2 May 2024

Dates: 13-17 July, 2000
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Host: Japan
Venue: Pacifico Yokohama Conference Center
Website: ICANN 6


ICANN 6 took place in Yokohama, Japan, and was the first ICANN event to take place in Japan.

Key developments[edit | edit source]

The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.[1] A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.[2] In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,[3] although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.[4].

The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from ICANN 5 in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.[5] The period for written public comments was very short,[6] but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.[7] The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,[8] as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.[9]

Outcomes[edit | edit source]

Bylaws Amendments[edit | edit source]

The board approved bylaws amendments enabling the appointment of five "At-large" directors to the board in 2000, with an eventual total of nine At-large directors. A temporary, four-person nominating committee was formed to assist with the initial selection of At-large, and a temporary election committee was formed to ensure the election of such directors was supported, well-structured, and fair.[1] In addition, the board commissioned a tabula rasa study of At-large membership issues, including:

  • Whether the ICANN Board should include "At Large" Directors;
  • If so, how many such Directors there should be;
  • How any such "At Large" Directors should be selected, including consideration of at least the following options: selection by an "At Large" membership; appointment by the existing Board; selection or appointment by some other entity or entities; and any combination of those options;
  • If selection by an "At Large" membership is to be used, the processes and procedures by which that selection will take place; and
  • What the appropriate structure, role and functions of an "At Large" membership should be.[1]

The board set deadlines for the study to conclude and present findings by mid-2001, with the goal that the board would act on the findings and recommendations of the study by the time of the 2001 Annual Meeting.[1]

Policy Developments and Highlights[edit | edit source]

The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.[1] A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.[10] In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,[11] although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.[12].

The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from ICANN 5 in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.[13] The period for written public comments was very short,[14] but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.[15] The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,[16] as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.[17]

Social & Community Highlights[edit | edit source]

The board acknowledged the work of Becky Burr in her role at the U.S. Department of Commerce in making ICANN a reality:

It would not be an overstatement to conclude that, without the enormous contributions of Becky Burr, ICANN would not be here today, or at a minimum would not have made the very significant progress that is reflected at this meeting. She could not have done it alone, but we could not have done what we have done without her tireless devotion to the objective of a viable and effective ICANN.[1]

Key sessions[edit | edit source]

ICANN Board[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 ICANN.org Archive - Meeting of the ICANN Board in Yokohama: Preliminary Report, July 16, 2000
  2. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, June 13, 2000
  3. ↑ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, July 12, 2000
  4. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary, July 15, 2000
  5. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies, July 5, 2000
  6. ↑ [https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000
  7. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies, July 15, 2000
  8. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement, July 5, 2000
  9. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation, July 15, 2000
  10. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, June 13, 2000
  11. ↑ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, July 12, 2000
  12. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary, July 15, 2000
  13. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies, July 5, 2000
  14. ↑ [https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000
  15. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies, July 15, 2000
  16. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement, July 5, 2000
  17. ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation, July 15, 2000
Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=ICANN_06&oldid=1350033"