IANA Functions Stewardship Transition: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
On December 2nd 2014, [[ICANN]] opened the public comment period on the draft transition document produced by the coordination group.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2014/12/02/icann-opens-comment-period-for-its-move-out-of-us-control-deadline-is-december-22nd/ ICANN opens comment period for its move out of US control]</ref> | On December 2nd 2014, [[ICANN]] opened the public comment period on the draft transition document produced by the coordination group.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2014/12/02/icann-opens-comment-period-for-its-move-out-of-us-control-deadline-is-december-22nd/ ICANN opens comment period for its move out of US control]</ref> | ||
==Legal roadblock== | |||
On the 4th December 2014, a large federal funding bill for over $1 trillion passed the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives United States House of Representatives] to which Republicans had attached a rider defunding any attempt by the [[NTIA]] to transfer its functions before October 2015. The global internet community reacted with "a combination of weariness and growing cynicism about the United States and its role in Internet governance."<ref>[http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/12/12/u-s-congress-man-in-the-middle-attack-on-iana-transition/ Congress defunds IANA transition]Retrieved 15th December 2014.</ref> | On the 4th December 2014, a large federal funding bill for over $1 trillion passed the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives United States House of Representatives] to which Republicans had attached a rider defunding any attempt by the [[NTIA]] to transfer its functions before October 2015. The global internet community reacted with "a combination of weariness and growing cynicism about the United States and its role in Internet governance."<ref>[http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/12/12/u-s-congress-man-in-the-middle-attack-on-iana-transition/ Congress defunds IANA transition]Retrieved 15th December 2014.</ref> | ||
Revision as of 00:58, 16 December 2014
The IANA Functions Stewardship Transition is a process and community discussion regarding the transition of IANA functions stewardship from its historical contract with the United States government's NTIA to the global Internet community. The process and discussion is spearheaded by ICANN and its various stakeholder groups, and was catalyzed by an announcement in March 2014 by NTIA that they would be relinquishing the stewardship to the Internet community.
NTIA Announcement[edit | edit source]
In March 2014 NTIA released a statement that they are intent on transitioning their part of the IANA functions away from NTIA and to the global stakeholder community. The first step in this process is for ICANN to convene stakeholders and create a proposal for how the IANA functions will remain secure and unwavering. The press release outlined a number of principles which the ICANN-community drafted proposal must meet:
- Must Support and enhance the multistakeholder model;
- Must Maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet DNS;
- Must Meet the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA services; and,
- Must Maintain the openness of the Internet.
The current NTIA contract with ICANN expires on 30 September, 2014, and members of the ICANN community took that date as a deadline for drafting and agreeing on a proposal.[1]
ICANN subsequently published their own press release that applauded NTIA's announcement and called it a recognition of the U.S. government to ICANN's "maturation in becoming an effective multistakeholder organization".[2]
Global media outlets picked up on the NTIA press release, with many United States media reporting that the United States Government was "giving up control of the Internet".
ICANN Community Discussion[edit | edit source]
After the NTIA announcement, discussion began among ICANN's various stakeholders regarding how the stewardship of the IANA functions should be transitioned and to what entity or entities. Various sessions and panels focused on this topic at ICANN 49 - Singapore and continued at ICANN 50 - London. It was also a topic of much discussion in organizations and conferences such as NETmundial, ISOC, IETF, Internet Governance Forum, and the United Nations.
Process Development[edit | edit source]
The NTIA announcement led to an ICANN-spearheaded discussion that began with a "Call for Public Input on the Draft Proposal of the Principles, Mechanisms and Process to Develop a Proposal to Transition NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions" that was posted by ICANN on 8 April 2014. The organization received hundreds of comments, highlighting the need to create a multistakeholder, transparent, and bottom-up process. A process document was published that included next steps and the implementation of a Coordination Group that would lead discussion and process of the IANA transition going forward.[3]
Coordination Group[edit | edit source]
The Coordination Group was formed by the ICANN community via nominations from 13 community groups, totaling 27 individuals. The current coordination group includes:
- ALAC: Mohamed El Bashir, Jean-Jacques Subrenat
- ASO: Hartmut Glaser
- ccNSO: Xiaodong Lee, Mary Uduma, Keith Davidson, Martin Boyle
- GAC: Heather Dryden (Interim Member), Tracy Hackshaw (Interim Member)
- GNSO: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben, Milton Mueller, James Bladel
- gTLD Registries: Keith Drazek, Jon Nevett
- ICC/BASIS: Joseph Alhadeff
- IAB: Russ Housley, Lynn St Amour
- IETF: Jari Arkko, Alissa Cooper
- ISOC: Narelle Clark, Demi Getschko
- NRO: Adiel Akplogan, Paul Wilson
- RSSAC: Daniel Karrenberg, Lars-Johan Liman
- ICANN Board Liaison: Kuo-Wei Wu
- IANA Staff Expert: Elise Gerich
The first face-to-face meeting of the Coordination Group took place in London from 17-18 July 2014.[4]
Public comment period[edit | edit source]
On December 2nd 2014, ICANN opened the public comment period on the draft transition document produced by the coordination group.[5]
Legal roadblock[edit | edit source]
On the 4th December 2014, a large federal funding bill for over $1 trillion passed the United States House of Representatives to which Republicans had attached a rider defunding any attempt by the NTIA to transfer its functions before October 2015. The global internet community reacted with "a combination of weariness and growing cynicism about the United States and its role in Internet governance."[6]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Press Release: NTIA Announces Intent to Transition Key Internet Domain Name Functions NTIA.doc.gov; Retrieved 09 July 2014
- ↑ Press Release March 14, 2014
- ↑ Process to Develop the Proposal and Next Steps Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions - ICANN.org; Retrieved 16 July 2014
- ↑ Coordination Group ICANN.org: Retrieved 16 July 2014
- ↑ ICANN opens comment period for its move out of US control
- ↑ Congress defunds IANA transitionRetrieved 15th December 2014.