ICANN 06: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Christiane (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "Key Sessions" to "Key sessions" |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ICANNMeetings| | {{ICANNMeetings| | ||
| logo = ICANNLogo.png | | logo = ICANNLogo.png | ||
| dates = | | dates = 13-17 July, 2000 | ||
| location = Yokohama, | | location = Yokohama, Japan | ||
| host = | | host = Japan | ||
| venue = Pacifico Yokohama Conference Center | | venue = Pacifico Yokohama Conference Center | ||
| website = [http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/] | | website = [http://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/ ICANN 6] | ||
| historicalimport = | |||
| historicalimport = | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''ICANN 6''' took place in Yokohama, Japan, and was the first [[ICANN]] event to take place in Japan. | |||
==Key developments== | |||
= | The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.<ref name="resos" /> A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.<ref "newTLDpaper">[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], June 13, 2000</ref> In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/newtlds/ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], July 12, 2000</ref> although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/nesson-tld-071500/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary], July 15, 2000</ref>. | ||
The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from [[ICANN 05 - Cairo|ICANN 5]] in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/cctld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies], July 5, 2000</ref> The period for written public comments was very short,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000</ref> but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/scribe-icann-071500.html#cctld ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies], July 15, 2000</ref> The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/draft-cctld-status-quo-agreement-05jul00.htm ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement], July 5, 2000</ref> as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/cctld/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation], July 15, 2000</ref> | |||
== | ==Outcomes== | ||
===Bylaws Amendments=== | |||
The board approved bylaws amendments enabling the appointment of five "At-large" directors to the board in 2000, with an eventual total of nine At-large directors. A temporary, four-person nominating committee was formed to assist with the initial selection of At-large, and a temporary election committee was formed to ensure the election of such directors was supported, well-structured, and fair.<ref name="resos">[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/prelim-report-2000-07-16-en ICANN.org Archive - Meeting of the ICANN Board in Yokohama: Preliminary Report], July 16, 2000</ref> In addition, the board commissioned a ''tabula rasa'' study of At-large membership issues, including: | |||
* Whether the ICANN Board should include "At Large" Directors; | |||
* If so, how many such Directors there should be; | |||
* How any such "At Large" Directors should be selected, including consideration of at least the following options: selection by an "At Large" membership; appointment by the existing Board; selection or appointment by some other entity or entities; and any combination of those options; | |||
* If selection by an "At Large" membership is to be used, the processes and procedures by which that selection will take place; and | |||
* What the appropriate structure, role and functions of an "At Large" membership should be.<ref name="resos" /> | |||
= | The board set deadlines for the study to conclude and present findings by mid-2001, with the goal that the board would act on the findings and recommendations of the study by the time of the 2001 Annual Meeting.<ref name="resos" /> | ||
===Policy Developments and Highlights=== | |||
== | The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.<ref name="resos" /> A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.<ref "newTLDpaper">[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/new-tld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], June 13, 2000</ref> In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/newtlds/ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper], July 12, 2000</ref> although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/nesson-tld-071500/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary], July 15, 2000</ref>. | ||
The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from [[ICANN 05 - Cairo|ICANN 5]] in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/cctld-topic.htm ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies], July 5, 2000</ref> The period for written public comments was very short,<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000</ref> but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/scribe-icann-071500.html#cctld ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies], July 15, 2000</ref> The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/yokohama/draft-cctld-status-quo-agreement-05jul00.htm ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement], July 5, 2000</ref> as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.<ref>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/yokohama/archive/presentations/cctld/ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation], July 15, 2000</ref> | |||
===Social & Community Highlights=== | |||
The board acknowledged the work of [[Becky Burr]] in her role at the U.S. Department of Commerce in making ICANN a reality: | |||
<blockquote>It would not be an overstatement to conclude that, without the enormous contributions of Becky Burr, ICANN would not be here today, or at a minimum would not have made the very significant progress that is reflected at this meeting. She could not have done it alone, but we could not have done what we have done without her tireless devotion to the objective of a viable and effective ICANN.<ref name="resos" /></blockquote> | |||
==Key sessions== | |||
== | ==ICANN Board== | ||
*[[Mike Roberts|Michael Roberts]]: President/CEO | |||
*[[Esther Dyson]]: Chair | |||
*[[Pindar Wong]]: Vice-chair | |||
*[[Geraldine Capdeboscq]] | |||
*[[George Conrades]] | |||
*[[Greg Crew]] | |||
*[[Frank Fitzsimmons]] | |||
*[[Hans Kraaijenbrink]] | |||
*[[Jun Murai]] | |||
*[[Eugenio Triana]] | |||
*[[Linda Wilson]] | |||
*[[Jonathan Cohen]] | |||
*[[Amadeu Abril i Abril]] | |||
*[[Robert Blokzijl]] | |||
*[[Phil Davidson|Philip Davidson]] | |||
*[[Ken Fockler]] | |||
*[[Jean-François Abramatic]] | |||
*[[Richard Thwaites]] | |||
*[[Vint Cerf]] | |||
*[[Alejandro Pisanty]] | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[Category: ICANN Meetings]] | [[Category: ICANN Meetings]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Japan]] |
Latest revision as of 21:30, 2 May 2024
Dates: | 13-17 July, 2000 |
Location: | Yokohama, Japan |
Host: | Japan |
Venue: | Pacifico Yokohama Conference Center |
Website: | ICANN 6 |
ICANN 6 took place in Yokohama, Japan, and was the first ICANN event to take place in Japan.
Key developments 编辑
The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.[1] A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.[2] In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,[3] although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.[4].
The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from ICANN 5 in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.[5] The period for written public comments was very short,[6] but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.[7] The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,[8] as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.[9]
Outcomes 编辑
Bylaws Amendments 编辑
The board approved bylaws amendments enabling the appointment of five "At-large" directors to the board in 2000, with an eventual total of nine At-large directors. A temporary, four-person nominating committee was formed to assist with the initial selection of At-large, and a temporary election committee was formed to ensure the election of such directors was supported, well-structured, and fair.[1] In addition, the board commissioned a tabula rasa study of At-large membership issues, including:
- Whether the ICANN Board should include "At Large" Directors;
- If so, how many such Directors there should be;
- How any such "At Large" Directors should be selected, including consideration of at least the following options: selection by an "At Large" membership; appointment by the existing Board; selection or appointment by some other entity or entities; and any combination of those options;
- If selection by an "At Large" membership is to be used, the processes and procedures by which that selection will take place; and
- What the appropriate structure, role and functions of an "At Large" membership should be.[1]
The board set deadlines for the study to conclude and present findings by mid-2001, with the goal that the board would act on the findings and recommendations of the study by the time of the 2001 Annual Meeting.[1]
Policy Developments and Highlights 编辑
The board took action to initiate the first round of new gTLD applications.[1] A topic paper, circulated for public comment in June, served as a guide to discussions among board members.[10] In addition, recommendations and reports from supporting organizations and advisory committees provided additional context and implementation guidance. Public comment on the topic paper was robust,[11] although the summary presented at the meeting noted that roughly one quarter of the responses were "non-substantive or off-topic," while roughly half of the comments pertained to proposals for specific TLDs.[12].
The conversation regarding ccTLD delegation and administration policies was continued from ICANN 5 in Cairo. The prepared materials included a number of new position papers and statements from various constituencies.[13] The period for written public comments was very short,[14] but comments were also received at the Public Forum on July 15.[15] The presentation during the forum focused on the progress toward drafting a standard agreement between ccTLD administrators and ICANN,[16] as well as other best practices and principles for ccTLD administration.[17]
Social & Community Highlights 编辑
The board acknowledged the work of Becky Burr in her role at the U.S. Department of Commerce in making ICANN a reality:
It would not be an overstatement to conclude that, without the enormous contributions of Becky Burr, ICANN would not be here today, or at a minimum would not have made the very significant progress that is reflected at this meeting. She could not have done it alone, but we could not have done what we have done without her tireless devotion to the objective of a viable and effective ICANN.[1]
Key sessions 编辑
ICANN Board 编辑
- Michael Roberts: President/CEO
- Esther Dyson: Chair
- Pindar Wong: Vice-chair
- Geraldine Capdeboscq
- George Conrades
- Greg Crew
- Frank Fitzsimmons
- Hans Kraaijenbrink
- Jun Murai
- Eugenio Triana
- Linda Wilson
- Jonathan Cohen
- Amadeu Abril i Abril
- Robert Blokzijl
- Philip Davidson
- Ken Fockler
- Jean-François Abramatic
- Richard Thwaites
- Vint Cerf
- Alejandro Pisanty
References 编辑
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 ICANN.org Archive - Meeting of the ICANN Board in Yokohama: Preliminary Report, July 16, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, June 13, 2000
- ↑ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, July 12, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary, July 15, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies, July 5, 2000
- ↑ [https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies, July 15, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement, July 5, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation, July 15, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, June 13, 2000
- ↑ ICANN Forum Archive - New TLD Topic Paper, July 12, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides, New TLD Public Comment Summary, July 15, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Adminstration Policies, July 5, 2000
- ↑ [https://forum.icann.org/cctld2/ ICANN Forum Archive - ccTLD Delegation & Administration Policies (Yokohama), July 13, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Scribe's Notes, ccTLD Policies, July 15, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Draft ccTLD-ICANN "Status Quo" Agreement, July 5, 2000
- ↑ ICANN 6 Archive - Presentation Slides - ccTLD Best Practice and Re/Delegation, July 15, 2000