Jump to content

Registries Stakeholder Group: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
RegLevy (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 119: Line 119:


==Affiliated Stakeholder Groups==
==Affiliated Stakeholder Groups==
Due to the structure of RySG and ICANN following the start of the [[New gTLD Program]], applicants who would potentially become registries if their applications were approved were allowed to join RySG as Observer members. To better represent their own unique perspectives within ICANN, they formed their own [[Stakeholder Group]], the New Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (or [[NTAG)]], organized as a Stakeholder Group under RySG. There are smaller groups inside of NTAG as well, created to better represent their members: the Community Top-Level Domain Applicant Group ([[CTAG]]) and the Geographic Top-Level Domain Applicant Group ([[GeoTAG]]). At the moment, these are much more informal groups.<ref>RySG Biweekly Conference Call, 14 November 2012</ref>
Due to the structure of RySG and ICANN following the start of the [[New gTLD Program]], applicants who would potentially become registries if their applications were approved were allowed to join RySG as Observer members. To better represent their own unique perspectives within ICANN, they formed their own [[SG|Stakeholder Group]], the [[NTAG|New Top-Level Domain Applicant Group]] (or NTAG], organized as a Stakeholder Group under RySG. There are smaller groups inside of NTAG as well, created to better represent their members: the [[CTAG|Community Top-Level Domain Applicant Group]] (CTAG) and the [[GTAG|Geographic Top-Level Domain Applicant Group]] (GeoTAG). At the moment, these are much more informal groups.<ref>RySG Biweekly Conference Call, 14 November 2012</ref>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 19:26, 14 November 2012

This article is neutral, but is sponsored by Verisign,
the registry for .com, .net, & other TLDs.
You can learn more about their services here.
ICANNWiki Platinum Sponsor

The Registries Stakeholder Group (also Registry Stakeholder Group, RySG, or gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group) is a Stakeholder Group within the Contracted Parties House under ICANN's GNSO. It represents the interests of the gTLD Registries currently under contract with ICANN and provides them with gTLD Registry Services. It also facilitates communication among the gTLD Registries and voices the views of the Registry Constituency to the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board of Directors, with a special emphasis on ICANN consensus policies, which relate to the technical reliability, interoperability and the stable operation of the Internet or DNS.[1]

Organization and Membership of the RySG[edit | edit source]

The membership of the RySG is open to all TLD Registries. Registries must apply for membership via the application process. Every Registry needs to identify a Voting Delegate and, if desired, alternate Voting Delegates.

Funding[edit | edit source]

Funding for the RySG is provided by its members. Every member joining the Group needs to pay an initial membership fee as well as a fixed annual membership fee and a variable annual membership fee as per the schedule of the RySG. A member loses its voting rights if it fails to pay the fees as previously invoiced within thirty days after a written notice of non-payment.[2]

Structure of the RySG[edit | edit source]

Executive Committee[edit | edit source]

The RySG consists of an Executive Committee, which is comprised of a Chair, an Alternate Chair, and a Treasurer. The main responsibilities of the Executive Committee are to facilitate policy coordination meetings, to support the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board, as requested by ICANN, and to manage and administer elections.

GNSO Representatives[edit | edit source]

The following individials represent the Registry Constituency and its views within the larger Generic Name Supporting Organization:

Registrars Stakeholder Group (RrSG) Constituency Liaison[edit | edit source]

ICANN Nominating Committee Representative[edit | edit source]

Interest Groups[edit | edit source]

For the sake of collaborating on vital issues of common interest within the RySG, members self-organize themselves into different Interest Groups. The main responsibilities of these specific Interest Groups is to nominate candidates for GNSO Council Representatives, participate in the GNSO policy development processes, and develop position statements with special emphasis on the ICANN consensus policies.

The current/active Interest Groups and their members are:

Affirmation of Commitments (AoC)

Anti-Phishing Work Group

Fake Renewal Notices Drafting Team

Fast Flux Working Group

ICANN Academy Working Group

IDN

Internationalized Registration Data Work Group

Inter-Registrar Transfers Policy Working Group

Lock of Domain Name Subject to UDRP PDP Working Group

Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) Implementation Review Team

RAA Amendments Drafting Team

Registrar Accreditation Agreement Onboarding Inprovements Working Group

Registries Communication Practices Working Group

Registry Constituency[edit | edit source]

Prior to the GNSO restructuring, the Registry Stakeholder Group was known as the Registry Constituency. It was comprised of the registry operators for the .net, .org, .name, .com, .pro, .museum, .aero, .coop and .info gTLDs, which were the only TLDs at the time.[5]

Affiliated Stakeholder Groups[edit | edit source]

Due to the structure of RySG and ICANN following the start of the New gTLD Program, applicants who would potentially become registries if their applications were approved were allowed to join RySG as Observer members. To better represent their own unique perspectives within ICANN, they formed their own Stakeholder Group, the New Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (or NTAG], organized as a Stakeholder Group under RySG. There are smaller groups inside of NTAG as well, created to better represent their members: the Community Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (CTAG) and the Geographic Top-Level Domain Applicant Group (GeoTAG). At the moment, these are much more informal groups.[6]

References[edit | edit source]