ICANNWiki Giveaways

Examples

Ideas

* We might see who can get the most cards signed? -- in which case we might need to take this page down and do it offline...

What does this mean? Caterina

In Singapore, we might make a little contest to see who can get the most cards signed? Ray

Save for later conferences

* Also, let's go with with great caricatures and likelihood of attending Singapore, vs. well known. i.e. you don't have to be famous to make it into the deck

I think it's good to get well-known people on the cards. We can fill up the rest with great caricatures and likelihood of attending. I think it's important to keep at least the ICANN and sponsor people. Caterina

• Maybe sponsors on Joker cards? Or maybe not, since the Joker Cards are such good places for people too :-)

I think sponsors sounds good, since jokers are the most dispensable card. Caterina

* Okay, so I like the examples without the border (1-3), is the difference between those three just the background color of the photo? I like the back example as well, I like the logo for Singapore- I think it's a good specificity and while it would date any leftover cards it seems like a good plan just to not have any leftovers.

Border on face cards because that's how they are traditionally

** As far as choosing people, I have yet to add any specific input but I have a few points nonetheless! First, I think the more recognizable the better. I would say that all caricatures prior to Ryan's work have a tendency to not really look like the actual individual. That doesn't mean we should exclude Rhoda's work but I think we should have an eye for using good, recognizable caricatures. (Putting a person's name at the bottom of the card would be ideal, in my opinion, but that could be an extra printing hurdle).

• • I think it's good you don't have to be famous to get in the deck, but we may want to also have an eye for good sports. I.e., your average attendee may not want 1,000 cards floating around with a caricature of them on it. It's easier to expect a positive response when dealing with the big ICANN attendees because everyone knows them anyway! Also, picking out good caricatures will help control this problem.
  • I was expecting sponsors to be put on an extra card in the deck; not because this was ever discussed or even listed as a possible option yet, but because most decks of cards have those extra ad-type cards...This is another one of my solutions that would require more printing, thus money and coordination with the printers..but with the amount we're ordering maybe we could swing that. ANYWAYS, I think the joker could work for the reasons ya'll have stated, but they also are prime real-estate. With that said, I don't think I know anyone well enough to nominate them as an ICANN joker. Andrew

One sponsor joker, one person joker.

* Also, I've noticed the beginnings of thematic grouping of the individuals by suit. That's a good idea in my opinion, it provides a cohesiveness to the suit and I think it even helps carry forward the way ICANN is very much set around networks and groups rather than individuals. If we made those categories firm it would help us fill in the blanks more quickly. (it could be hard to fill out and entire suit, but I still think it's worth it). Right now it seems we have: Spades - ICANN Supporting Orgs, Clubs- ICANN Board members and ICANN staff, Hearts - People from the RALOS, Diamonds - Sponsors. I like that too (I've been saying I like a lot of things, it's true). We could combine the RALOS/Supporting Orgs if we wanted to do a whole suit of non-affiliated attendees, the non-famous attendees if you will. Room to play here but I like the thematic grouping idea.Andrew

Themes stabilized, see below.

Suits

Spades - ICANN

1. Rod Beckstrom - ICANN
2. Peter Dengate Thrush - ICANN board
3. Steve Crocker - ICANN board
4. Sébastien Bachollet - ICANN board
6. Rajasekhar Ramaraj - ICANN Board
7. Adam Peake - NomCom
8. Suzanne Woolf - Liaison RSSAC
9. Katim Touray, ICANN Board (decent caricature from one of the bad artists)
10. Heather Dryden -Liaison SSAC (caricature quality?)
11. Kuo-Wei Wu - IANA chair
12. Ruth Puente - GAC Secretariat (The U.S. rep thing was funny, Cat, geez)
13. Tanzanica King - ICANN

Clubs - Grab Bag

1. Andrew Pink
2. Alexa Raad
3. Frank March
4. Choon Sai Lim
5. Abdulaziz Al-Zoman
6. Peters Omoragbon ====>Boring Caricature Andrew, the lady from the neighboring SF booth - the one on the Ace example up top could go here. good caricature/ recognizable/ woman (currently underrepresented)
9. Edmon Chung ===>not a flattering caricature Andrew
11. Fouad Riaz Bajwa
12. Annalisa Roger
13. Bill Drake

Hearts - Volunteers/Non-Profits

2. Wolf Ludwig - EURALO
3. Beau Brendler - NARALO
4. Andres Piazza - LACRALO
5. Fatimata Seye Sylla - AFRALO ==> don't like caricature, could use out of necessity (lack of women in this suit thus far) Andrew
6. Patrik Faltstrom - SSAC
7. Stephane Van Gelder - GNSO
8. Chris Disspain - ccNSO
9. Hartmut Richard Glaser
12. Janice Douma Lange - ICANN

Diamonds - Sponsors

1. I don't think it'd be bad to have Ray here, subtle tongue in cheek reference to our financing, depending on how he feels. If not, Ram Mohan.
2. Pat Kane- Verisign
3. Daniel Ruzzini Meija - Domainsbot
4. unspecified EuroDNS person needs caricature
5. Ivor Sequeira - NeuStar ===>unflattering caricature, good sport?
6. Nathalie Dreyfus
7. Matt Buckland - RegistryPro Director needs caricature
8. Hal Lubsen - Afilias CEO needs caricature
9. Tim Chen - DomainTools CEO needs caricature
10. Xavier Buck - EuroDNS CEO
11. Emiliano Pasqualetti - DomainsBot CEO
12. Judy Song-Marshall - Neustar
13. Mark McLaughlin - Verisign CEO

Jokers

1. John Berryhill or Elliot Noss
2. Sponsors

Nominating Committee

Root Server System Advisory Committee. Advises the ICANN community and Board on matters relating to the operation, administration, security, and integrity of the Internet's Root Server System (ICANN Bylaws).

Security and Stability Advisory Committee. Advises the ICANN community and Board on matters relating to the security and integrity of the Internet's naming and address allocation systems (ICANN Bylaws).

Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

Governmental Advisory Committee. Considers and provides advice on the activities of ICANN as they relate to concerns of governments, particularly matters where there may be an interaction between ICANN's policies and various laws and international agreements or where they may affect public policy issues (ICANN Bylaws).

Generic Names Supporting Organization. Develops and recommends to the Board substantive policies relating to generic top-level domains and other responsibilities set forth in the Bylaws (ICANN Bylaws).

Country Code Names Supporting Organization. Develops and recommends to the Board global policies relating to country-code top-level domains (ICANN Bylaws).