3,197
edits
Changes
→Summary Table of Requests
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-02-03-en#2.b Denied by resolution of the Board]
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-02-03-en#2.b Denied by resolution of the Board]
| "The Requesters claim, without support, that ICANN staff unilaterally imposed the New gTLD Registry Agreement as a starting point for the Renewed Registry Agreements and, therefore, 'transform[ed] the PDDRP and URS into de facto Consensus Policies without following the procedures laid out in ICANN's Bylaws for their creation.' Contrary to what the Requesters claim, while the registry operators had a presumptive right of renewal under the terms of their existing legacy registry agreement, they chose to re-negotiate and renew their agreements based upon the New gTLD Registry Agreement terms."<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-02-03-en#2.b Resolution of the Board], February 3, 2016</ref>
| "The Requesters claim, without support, that ICANN staff unilaterally imposed the New gTLD Registry Agreement as a starting point for the Renewed Registry Agreements and, therefore, 'transform[ed] the PDDRP and URS into de facto Consensus Policies without following the procedures laid out in ICANN's Bylaws for their creation.' Contrary to what the Requesters claim, while the registry operators had a presumptive right of renewal under the terms of their existing legacy registry agreement, they chose to re-negotiate and renew their agreements based upon the New gTLD Registry Agreement terms."<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-02-03-en#2.b Resolution of the Board], February 3, 2016</ref>
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-15-21-dotgay-2015-10-26-en 15-21:] dotgay LLC
| dotgay did not prevail in its second [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.gay]]
| No*
| Deny
| No action taken
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-15-22-cis-request-2015-11-06-en 15-22:] [[Centre for Internet & Society]]
| Staff responses to two [[Document Information Disclosure Policy|DIDP]] requests regarding ICANN [[Contractual Compliance]] activities
| No*
| Deny
| No action taken
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-1-commercial-connect-request-2016-01-27-en 16-1] and [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-2-commercial-connect-request-2016-02-10-en 16-2:] [[Commercial Connect LLC]]
| Staff determinations regarding Commercial Connect's efforts to initiate a CEP around its [[.shop]] application, and to prevent an [[Auctions of Last Resort|auction]] for [[.shop]]
| No
| Deny
| No action taken
| "The Requester’s claims are unsupported and are the latest in a long line of frivolous abuses of ICANN’s accountability mechanisms by the Requester. The Requester’s renewed attempt to challenge the CPE Report is improper and time-barred. The Requester has not raised any new arguments or evidence since its previous challenge to the CPE report in Request 15-13, which was denied. As to the other issues raised by the Requester, the facts demonstrate that ICANN staff adhered to established policy and procedure with respect to the Auction, took unprecedented steps to keep the Requester apprised of, and involved in, the Auction, and properly responded to the Requester’s many incomplete, aborted, and/or improper attempts to invoke ICANN’s accountability mechanisms. The BGC therefore denies Requests 16-1 and 16-2."
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-3-dotgay-request-2016-02-18-en 16-3:] dotgay LLC
| Objecting to the Second CPE assessment for [[.gay]] (see RR 15-21) and taking issue with alleged process failures during the CPE
| No
| Deny
| No action taken
| dotgay LLC withdrew the request a month after the BAMC's recommendation was published
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-4-belichenko-request-2016-02-19-en 16-4:] Roman Belichenko
| Requester's domain, magic-pills.com, was suspended by GoDaddy for selling pharmeceuticals and controlled substances without a prescription and/or directing traffic to sites that did. After suspension, GoDaddy refused a transfer request from requester, and requester sought reconsideration of that decision.
| No*
| Deny
| No action taken
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
|-
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reconsideration-16-5-dotmusic-request-2016-02-25-en 16-5:] [[DotMusic Limited]]
| DotMusic did not prevail in its [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process for [[.music]]
| No
| Deny
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-03-14-en#2.d Denied by resolution]
|
|}
|}