Batch 1[edit | edit source]

  1. ACP- Not enough information, instead posted VoIP - CP
  2. ADR-CP - see comments on talk page.
  3. AFA-CP - structure section unclear. what does the office mean?
  4. AFNIC-CP - Attempted to edit, but many sections of article are unclear.
  5. AFTLD-CP
  6. AIRA- Not enough information, instead posted APTLD - CP - The section about the JPA is confusing.
  7. APRAM-CP - history section a little unclear. For example, what does this mean: "APRAM was born mostly from a conjunction of the wishes of designs (patent attorneys, lawyers and industry) and professional trademarks"?
  8. APNG-CP
  9. BGC-CP
  10. BE
  11. CAIP-CP - the end of objectives and the first two bullets in code of conduct are unclear
  12. CDT-CP
  13. CIGREF-CP
  14. CNRI
  15. CORE-MoU-CP
  16. CCT-CP
  17. DARPA-CP - DARPA and ICANN section is unclear, especially towards the end.
  18. DOC-CP. How does the DOC relate to ICANN?
  19. DeNIC -Not enough information, instead posted ITU - CP
  20. DAG
  21. DT-CP - The drafting team process section is unclear
  22. DRP
  23. EC-CP - EC and ICANN section is unclear
  24. ECTA-CP
  25. eCOMLAC-CP
  26. ENRED -Not enough information, instead posted DNSO - CP
  27. ETNO-CP
  28. ETSI-CP - strategic goals section unclear
  29. EuroInternet-Not enough information, instead posting IGF - CP
  30. EuroISPA-CP
  31. EOI-CP
  32. FCC-CP. Strategic goals section is unclear.
  33. FOA-CP
  34. FF
  35. FFWG
  36. FAG-CP - the changes section seems irrelevant if we don't know what the changes are being applied to. Can you make a section explaining the different modules?
  37. GA-CP
  38. GCOT-CP
  39. GPML-CP this article could use more clarification. It's not clear how the GMPL and New TLDs are related.
  40. GII-CP
  41. HSTLD-CP
  42. IAB-CP
  43. IAHC-CP. Some parts of article are unclear, especially in the introduction. Article needs more sources.
  44. ICC-CP
  45. IESG-CP. The role section requires more clarification. We need to know what the internet standards process is before we can understand how it related to IESG.
  46. INTA-CP. The last paragraph needs more clarification. What is the "overreaching issue" being discussed?
  47. IOPS.ORG-Not enough information, instead posted LACTLD - CP
  48. iPOC-CP
  49. JPA-CP
  50. URL-CP - Article is unclear.

Batch 2[edit | edit source]

  1. JIG
  2. KENIC
  3. LSE
  4. MARQUES
  5. MoU
  6. MPAA
  7. MOPO
  8. NANC
  9. NANP
  10. NSF
  11. NSI
  12. NTIA
  13. NCSG
  14. NCPH
  15. NOIF
  16. OECD
  17. OSC
  18. OARC
  19. PAB
  20. POC
  21. PEDNR
  22. PPSC
  23. PDEPDP
  24. PDP-WT
  25. PDDM
  26. PDDRP
  27. RFC
  28. RAA
  29. RyC
  30. RAP WG
  31. RySG
  32. RrSG
  33. SRS- Article stub, needs to be built
  34. SIC
  35. SG
  36. SOI
  37. STI
  38. STI-DT
  39. TCP
  40. TDRP
  41. TzNIC
  42. TIX
  43. TOR
  44. TMC
  45. TDG
  46. USPTO
  47. URSS
  48. UPU
  49. USCIB
  50. VI

Batch 3 (coming)[edit | edit source]

These terms (both glossary terms and company terms) are frequently linked on our site, though they remain without their own page. Creating articles for them will create the wonderful web of information we're looking for.

Check out the pages that link to these terms by going to Most Linked to Pages and then clicking on the number of links (in blue parentheses) next to the term in question. Reading these first may provide a greater context and direction to go for the new page. Good luck!

  1. MoU
  2. WSIS
  3. ICANN Board
  4. STLD
  5. AuDA
  6. .com
  7. IPv4
  8. IPv6 -needs to be reworked
  9. Registrars Constituency
  10. IEEE
  11. DDOS
  12. NIC
  13. AGEIA DENSI
  14. WGIG
  15. JPRS
  16. ENUM
  17. NCUC
  18. CA - Certificate Authorities
  19. .uk
  20. ALS
  21. ISPCP
  22. CABASE
  23. NIC Chile
  24. Business Constituency - needs more
  25. IPC
  26. SEO
  27. NANOG
  28. ACM
  29. WSIS
  30. VS
  31. VIWG
  32. WTO
  33. WWTLD
  34. WG
  35. WGIG
  36. WLS
  37. WT
  38. FCCN